tschanbong

tschanbong — CS2 Stats

DE76561198449768639[U:1:489502911]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,375Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,708Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,137Top 50% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#52456 of 251410 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,463 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,137 -2,862 20 May – 2 Oct · 19 days played
21,32425,004peak 25,00420 May2 Oct
25,120Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,463Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-05-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,463
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 68 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,867 below peak (25,004)
  • -1 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,863 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.6%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy12.1%13.3%13.7%1.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.071.090.14 short
Match win rate47.6%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtschanbongFACEITLevel 9 · 1,463 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,137 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,463csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning63
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–55–2Last 10043%Win rateLWWWTWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +126ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility6.6
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.3
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time574ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 21 May →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 5 Sept →
336msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · vertigo, 30 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 4 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 53% over 15dust2Weakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2210–1245%0.01
ancientC167–944%0.00
cacheC156–940%0.01
dust2D154–1127%-0.01
mirageB158–753%0.04
nukeB84–450%-0.01
anubisB63–350%0.01
overpass—21–150%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,980Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,150Matches
47.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
52.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12.1%Shot accuracy
4,862MVPs
1,141Hours (in match)
3,574Bombs planted
761Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,330inferno
2,181dust2
771nuke
703vertigo
196train
14cbble
13lake
11safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

673Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
79.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2552%1.3818.0
Inferno1947%1.0615.7
Ancient1867%1.2415.9
Dust21250%0.9713.5
Anubis967%1.1815.8
Overpass786%1.3220.9
Cache650%0.9614.0
Nuke475%1.2318.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
580msReaction time
36.3%T opening success
60.9%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
11.5%Flash assists
11.27HE damage / grenade
6.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2506% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0423%10 Oct →
dust213–30.0427%10 Oct →
cache13–110.1026%2 Oct →
cache13–90.0318%2 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0524%26 Sept →
ancient13–70.0224%26 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0224%25 Sept →
mirage13–20.1420%25 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0733%25 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0422%25 Sept →
mirage8–130.0224%25 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0131%23 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0218%23 Sept →
inferno13–110.0828%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0341%21 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0122%20 Sept →
inferno9–130.0426%11 Sept →
cache9–130.0224%11 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0521%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.0317%9 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0030%9 Sept →
ancient13–50.0519%5 Sept →
inferno13–50.0541%5 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0318%4 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0129%4 Sept →
inferno13–10.1331%4 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0116%3 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0812%2 Sept →
inferno9–130.0515%31 Aug →
dust28–130.0233%31 Aug →
vertigo2–9-0.2024%30 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0222%29 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0413%29 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0518%29 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0122%29 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0119%26 Aug →
inferno11–130.0117%23 Aug →
mirage16–120.1433%23 Aug →
inferno13–90.0424%21 Aug →
ancient13–110.0923%21 Aug →
inferno1–8-0.0526%21 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0330%19 Aug →
nuke2–130.0432%19 Aug →
inferno12–160.0225%16 Aug →
ancient7–130.0526%14 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0119%14 Aug →
dust27–130.0139%10 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0227%10 Aug →
cache13–100.0124%8 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0126%8 Aug →
anubis7–130.0121%7 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0331%7 Aug →
anubis16–12-0.0118%7 Aug →
anubis13–20.0930%7 Aug →
cache6–130.0231%7 Aug →
inferno16–12-0.0325%7 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0617%5 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0326%5 Aug →
cache10–130.0327%1 Aug →
nuke11–2-0.0414%1 Aug →
anubis16–130.0533%1 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0222%1 Aug →
cache13–80.0321%31 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0315%31 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0139%30 Jul →
cache16–130.0827%28 Jul →
ancient13–80.0623%26 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0132%26 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0516%22 Jul →
cache13–60.0215%22 Jul →
overpass4–13-0.0720%23 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0121%23 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0322%23 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0424%16 Jun →
ancient8–130.0424%13 Jun →
mirage13–50.0828%13 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0727%8 Jun →
inferno17–19-0.0432%8 Jun →
inferno13–20.1128%7 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0739%6 Jun →
inferno0–13-0.010%6 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0021%6 Jun →
mirage13–70.0331%4 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.0421%4 Jun →
mirage16–140.0424%2 Jun →
mirage13–70.0525%30 May →
overpass16–130.0316%30 May →
inferno13–70.0026%30 May →
mirage9–13-0.0225%28 May →
inferno7–13-0.0514%28 May →
inferno13–11-0.0027%28 May →
mirage2–13-0.0518%25 May →
cache8–13-0.0514%22 May →
mirage10–13-0.0018%21 May →
mirage13–10.1529%21 May →
mirage13–60.0823%20 May →
inferno13–110.0033%20 May →
anubis9–13-0.0020%20 May →
dust29–130.0530%20 May →
ancient13–70.0629%20 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.