makskiller

makskiller — CS2 Stats

76561198449706666[U:1:489440938]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,111Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,560Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,666Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36091 of 260000 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (36 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,666 +4,286 21 Aug – 30 Sept · 22 days played
19,38024,443peak 24,44321 Aug30 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,977 +0 31 Aug – 22 Sept · 4 observations
1,9771,977peak 1,97731 Aug22 Sept
24,443Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,977Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 777 below peak (24,443)
  • +1,668 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,334 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.2%48.2%50.9%7.7% short
Shot accuracy13.9%13.2%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio1.121.071.09above
Match win rate42.2%46.9%48.4%6.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmakskillerFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,666 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,977csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning50
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateWLWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time508ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 29 Aug →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 28 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · inferno, 4 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 29 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 12mirageWeakest map · 41% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2912–1741%0.01
dust2A1811–761%0.01
ancientB168–850%0.00
infernoS1210–283%0.01
anubisA106–460%-0.00
nukeS96–367%0.03
cacheA53–260%0.03
vertigo—10–10%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 29). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,029Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
3,762Matches
42.2%Match win rate
43.2%Headshot %
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
8,479MVPs
1,560Hours (in match)
4,360Bombs planted
918Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,390
AWP6,535
P2502,997
MP71,585
MP91,227

Lifetime map wins

5,290inferno
1,810nuke
1,354dust2
1,033cbble
975vertigo
664train
464lake
110office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

416Matches
55%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
82.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9151%1.2517.0
Ancient5758%1.2417.0
Inferno4553%1.4018.4
Anubis4459%1.3017.2
Dust22748%1.2415.1
Nuke2650%1.3217.5
Vertigo2450%1.2517.9
Overpass1050%1.5016.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
502msReaction time
18.4%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
10.77HE damage / grenade
7.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.3802% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–10-0.0320%1 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.049%30 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0713%26 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0311%26 Sept →
ancient13–100.0324%23 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0611%22 Sept →
mirage11–130.1033%20 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0126%20 Sept →
inferno13–60.0220%20 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0330%20 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0035%20 Sept →
ancient16–140.0513%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0310%19 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.039%17 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0114%16 Sept →
mirage13–90.0819%15 Sept →
vertigo8–80.0938%14 Sept →
mirage5–130.0619%12 Sept →
inferno13–110.0114%11 Sept →
inferno13–60.0320%9 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0421%9 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0316%9 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0719%9 Sept →
nuke13–110.0213%8 Sept →
dust26–130.0011%8 Sept →
mirage15–150.0117%8 Sept →
ancient10–130.0111%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.1121%7 Sept →
mirage13–20.0426%7 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0128%7 Sept →
cache13–80.0319%7 Sept →
inferno5–130.0324%6 Sept →
anubis13–90.0714%6 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0219%6 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0217%4 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0023%4 Sept →
nuke8–130.0418%4 Sept →
anubis13–70.0428%4 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0115%4 Sept →
ancient3–130.0920%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0614%3 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0121%3 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0316%3 Sept →
dust213–70.0422%3 Sept →
dust213–110.0525%3 Sept →
anubis13–100.0418%2 Sept →
dust213–70.0618%2 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0628%2 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0126%2 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.0917%2 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0025%2 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0511%2 Sept →
dust213–40.0217%31 Aug →
inferno10–50.019%31 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0413%31 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0617%30 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.037%30 Aug →
ancient5–130.0012%30 Aug →
mirage13–80.0714%30 Aug →
mirage13–80.0821%30 Aug →
dust29–130.0626%30 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0214%29 Aug →
anubis13–60.0913%29 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0014%29 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0416%29 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0021%29 Aug →
cache13–10.1514%29 Aug →
ancient13–80.0118%29 Aug →
mirage13–80.0513%29 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0012%29 Aug →
ancient13–10.099%28 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0020%28 Aug →
nuke13–80.0519%28 Aug →
mirage13–80.0527%28 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0515%28 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0115%28 Aug →
inferno13–50.0742%28 Aug →
nuke8–130.0525%28 Aug →
mirage7–130.0215%27 Aug →
mirage7–130.0118%27 Aug →
ancient13–60.0524%27 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0115%27 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0516%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0016%27 Aug →
cache7–130.0219%26 Aug →
mirage12–60.0133%26 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0315%26 Aug →
mirage13–80.0727%26 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0619%26 Aug →
mirage13–80.0128%25 Aug →
inferno13–110.0126%25 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0511%22 Aug →
mirage13–60.079%22 Aug →
dust29–130.0219%22 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0610%22 Aug →
nuke13–50.0323%21 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0622%21 Aug →
dust213–110.0716%21 Aug →
dust213–10.0112%21 Aug →
nuke13–80.1130%21 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.