Thornesse

Thornesse — CS2 Stats

AT76561198420817176[U:1:460551448]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,851Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,626Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,822Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7770 of 261636 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,775 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 26,822 → 26,822
0Faceit ELO · 1,775 → 1,775
+22Tracked matches · now 1,851
0.0ppWin rate · 42.9% → 42.9%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,822 +9,262 22 Apr – 2 Nov · 29 days played
17,56027,085peak 27,08522 Apr2 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,775 +0 8 Sept – 2 Nov · 7 observations
1,7751,775peak 1,7758 Sept2 Nov
27,085Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,775Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-04-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,775
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 226 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 263 below peak (27,085)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • -263 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,178 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches10486+18
Win rate49%60%−11pp
K/D0.860.72+0.14
Headshot %58%58%−1pp

Measured 15 Oct 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; previous 20 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate62.6%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy6.6%13.2%13.7%7.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.071.09meets
Match win rate42.2%46.9%48.4%6.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThornesseFACEITLevel 9 · 1,775 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,822 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,775csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning58
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–42–8Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility3.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time564ms−82ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 21 Jun →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · inferno, 4 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 11 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 3 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9cacheWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2512–1348%0.01
mirageA1810–856%0.01
ancientB157–847%0.03
dust2B115–645%-0.00
cacheC104–640%-0.04
anubisC94–544%0.01
nukeS96–367%0.03
overpass—32–167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

105,021Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
4,118Matches
42.2%Match win rate
62.6%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
6.6%Shot accuracy
8,393MVPs
1,570Hours (in match)
3,577Bombs planted
987Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4755,457
AWP3,984
MP92,170
MAC-101,610
P901,080

Lifetime map wins

7,943inferno
3,301nuke
2,296dust2
1,153vertigo
273train
158lake
69ar_shoots
45safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

521Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
77.5ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15953%1.1316.5
Inferno9059%1.1716.3
Ancient7951%1.2017.5
Anubis6265%1.2017.1
Dust25042%0.9415.1
Nuke4854%1.3117.8
Vertigo1145%1.2818.1
Overpass1040%1.2717.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
577msReaction time
57.0%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
7.42HE damage / grenade
5.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.2748% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0129%13 Nov →
anubis11–130.0227%6 Nov →
dust21–130.0430%2 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0423%29 Oct →
inferno8–130.0430%29 Oct →
cache10–13-0.027%23 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0238%23 Oct →
inferno9–5-0.0621%23 Oct →
inferno4–90.0526%23 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0120%22 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0216%20 Oct →
ancient13–100.0818%19 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0233%18 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0421%17 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0723%17 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0324%15 Oct →
anubis9–130.0422%10 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0224%6 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0118%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0324%2 Oct →
mirage13–90.0521%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0219%25 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0222%24 Sept →
ancient15–150.0927%24 Sept →
nuke13–20.0228%18 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0020%17 Sept →
inferno13–100.0323%15 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.1012%11 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0227%11 Sept →
inferno9–20.2322%10 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.2036%10 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0920%10 Sept →
inferno8–80.0630%10 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0621%10 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0020%7 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.114%5 Sept →
mirage12–120.0420%5 Sept →
inferno9–20.0256%4 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0436%3 Sept →
ancient9–130.0327%3 Sept →
mirage4–130.0325%31 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0630%31 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0518%1 Aug →
mirage13–40.0341%31 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0813%31 Jul →
inferno9–00.000%24 Jul →
anubis3–00.0125%24 Jul →
ancient5–130.0228%24 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0539%24 Jul →
cache16–14-0.0522%24 Jul →
cache16–14-0.0416%19 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0220%17 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0336%17 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0645%17 Jul →
cache13–3-0.0228%17 Jul →
mirage13–70.0221%13 Jul →
inferno13–70.0212%10 Jul →
nuke13–80.1023%10 Jul →
ancient13–100.1523%10 Jul →
cache12–120.0125%8 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0027%3 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0123%3 Jul →
inferno8–130.0130%3 Jul →
inferno11–130.0432%3 Jul →
ancient13–80.0627%1 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0511%27 Jun →
overpass13–110.0119%25 Jun →
mirage13–20.0315%25 Jun →
anubis13–100.0511%23 Jun →
inferno9–20.2534%21 Jun →
dust28–130.0322%7 Jun →
nuke16–130.0424%1 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0521%1 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.0415%1 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.0128%1 Jun →
mirage13–90.0122%1 Jun →
ancient8–00.0125%28 May →
nuke13–10.0629%28 May →
inferno13–110.0430%28 May →
nuke13–80.0826%19 May →
ancient13–50.1330%18 May →
mirage10–130.0736%18 May →
nuke8–130.0316%18 May →
overpass13–90.0523%15 May →
ancient15–150.0036%11 May →
dust213–3-0.0014%11 May →
anubis13–20.0418%11 May →
inferno8–8-0.0946%11 May →
inferno10–130.0427%11 May →
inferno2–9-0.1216%11 May →
inferno13–70.0223%29 Apr →
dust211–130.0425%29 Apr →
cache12–120.0133%29 Apr →
mirage13–100.0322%27 Apr →
anubis4–130.0111%27 Apr →
nuke13–60.0221%27 Apr →
mirage13–50.0727%22 Apr →
ancient5–130.0728%22 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0421%22 Apr →
inferno13–70.1230%17 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.