Cellato

Cellato — CS2 Stats

HR76561198420292854[U:1:460027126]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

388Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,790Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (61 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+12Tracked matches · now 388
−3.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 43.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,378 +2,678 10 Apr – 1 Jul · 31 days played
15,70019,083peak 19,08310 Apr1 Jul
19,135Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-04-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.1%44.8%45.7%2.6% short
Shot accuracy15.1%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.071.031.05above
Match win rate48.0%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCellatoFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLWWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time586ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 17 Jun →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 9 Apr →
383msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 28 May →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 16 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
13–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 19infernoWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC228–1436%0.00
dust2B2211–1150%0.01
mirageA1912–763%-0.00
ancientA169–756%0.00
nukeB126–650%-0.02
cache—30–30%-0.01
train—21–150%-0.02
anubis—21–150%-0.01
debris—11–0100%0.06
overpass—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,359Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2,851Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
43.1%Headshot %
15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
6,858MVPs
1,066Hours (in match)
3,106Bombs planted
626Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,322inferno
1,905dust2
979vertigo
594nuke
456cbble
449train
65office
40lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

311Matches
51%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
88.6ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6149%1.4418.5
Dust22861%1.2018.1
Ancient2548%1.1517.4
Inferno2352%1.4017.4
Anubis1338%1.3719.1
Nuke1145%1.2015.7
Cache862%1.2618.1
Train633%1.4517.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
596msReaction time
51.7%T opening success
34.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
12.37HE damage / grenade
10.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.3686% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0431%15 Oct →
dust213–110.0713%8 Oct →
dust213–30.0324%26 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0124%23 Sept →
inferno10–130.0316%17 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0511%17 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0021%10 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0319%10 Jul →
mirage13–100.0616%10 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0016%10 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0219%9 Jul →
debris9–60.0612%9 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0310%9 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.047%1 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0319%1 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0324%1 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0627%1 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0122%1 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0312%23 Jun →
train10–13-0.0125%23 Jun →
train13–7-0.0319%23 Jun →
inferno13–100.0229%23 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0122%23 Jun →
dust22–130.0112%23 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0430%23 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0312%21 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0711%21 Jun →
ancient13–5-0.0116%21 Jun →
inferno16–120.0423%19 Jun →
inferno3–130.0119%19 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0021%19 Jun →
mirage16–140.0413%19 Jun →
overpass13–110.0612%19 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0211%18 Jun →
mirage13–1-0.0110%18 Jun →
nuke4–130.0328%17 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0715%17 Jun →
dust213–110.1119%17 Jun →
inferno11–130.0120%16 Jun →
inferno13–00.0526%16 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0111%16 Jun →
inferno10–130.0215%15 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.036%12 Jun →
ancient13–110.0120%10 Jun →
dust29–130.0122%10 Jun →
inferno5–130.0119%9 Jun →
inferno13–30.0723%4 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0020%4 Jun →
nuke5–130.0415%3 Jun →
ancient16–130.0617%3 Jun →
dust211–130.0518%3 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.1316%28 May →
dust27–130.004%28 May →
mirage13–80.025%28 May →
ancient13–10.0129%28 May →
mirage13–100.0320%28 May →
ancient16–14-0.0311%28 May →
inferno11–130.0116%28 May →
inferno13–30.0523%28 May →
ancient14–16-0.0418%26 May →
anubis8–13-0.0324%26 May →
dust213–100.0518%26 May →
mirage16–140.0017%22 May →
mirage13–70.0319%21 May →
dust213–11-0.019%21 May →
inferno15–15-0.0113%21 May →
anubis13–5-0.0024%21 May →
ancient7–13-0.0522%21 May →
mirage10–130.0317%19 May →
mirage3–130.0327%19 May →
dust210–130.0420%18 May →
mirage3–13-0.096%18 May →
ancient14–160.0215%18 May →
mirage13–11-0.0216%18 May →
nuke7–13-0.054%9 May →
dust213–10-0.0216%9 May →
ancient13–7-0.0015%9 May →
dust215–15-0.0116%7 May →
cache9–130.0311%5 May →
dust210–13-0.0520%29 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0115%28 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0122%28 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0626%27 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0517%27 Apr →
dust216–13-0.0216%26 Apr →
mirage13–16-0.0622%26 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0410%23 Apr →
mirage11–130.0424%23 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0117%22 Apr →
mirage13–110.0127%22 Apr →
inferno13–80.0120%21 Apr →
mirage13–90.0212%17 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0718%16 Apr →
ancient16–130.0918%15 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0144%11 Apr →
dust213–30.0615%10 Apr →
dust213–10.1047%9 Apr →
dust211–2-0.0314%9 Apr →
nuke5–130.0114%9 Apr →
ancient13–90.1016%5 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.