Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 3,953
- Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 47 to go
- Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
- 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
- 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 97% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 98 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 22 | 17–5 | 77% | 0.02 | |
| S | 20 | 15–5 | 75% | 0.03 | |
| D | 16 | 3–13 | 19% | -0.00 | |
| A | 12 | 7–5 | 58% | 0.02 | |
| D | 12 | 4–8 | 33% | 0.01 | |
| A | 9 | 5–4 | 56% | 0.01 | |
| A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | 0.04 | |
| — | 4 | 0–4 | 0% | 0.04 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 335 | 58% | 1.61 | 19.5 |
| Ancient | 333 | 61% | 1.50 | 18.6 |
| Nuke | 242 | 66% | 1.52 | 19.2 |
| Anubis | 214 | 59% | 1.58 | 19.4 |
| Dust2 | 129 | 53% | 1.43 | 18.9 |
| Train | 71 | 55% | 1.47 | 19.6 |
| Vertigo | 64 | 70% | 1.56 | 17.4 |
| Inferno | 22 | 45% | 1.29 | 15.7 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Inventory
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.3789% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 37% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.03 | 36% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.01 | 39% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 26% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 24% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 17% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.07 | 27% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 24% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 41% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.02 | 27% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.05 | 24% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 14% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.07 | 19% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 14% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.07 | 19% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.02 | 27% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.08 | 5% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.02 | 27% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.08 | 5% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 24% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.01 | 15% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.01 | 15% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 24% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.00 | 37% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 22% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.00 | 37% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 22% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 30% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 30% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.04 | 27% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.11 | 38% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 21% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.07 | 42% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.09 | 18% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 17% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 16% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.08 | 43% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 15 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 8 May → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.02 | 29% | 8 May → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.03 | 48% | 8 May → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 33% | 3 May → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 30% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.04 | 35% | 26 Apr → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 26 Apr → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.11 | 31% | 25 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 38% | 25 Apr → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 42% | 24 Apr → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.05 | 38% | 24 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.02 | 46% | 24 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.00 | 35% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 43% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 17–19 | -0.03 | 38% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 8 Apr → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.04 | 0% | 3 Apr → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 44% | 3 Apr → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 29% | 2 Apr → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 29% | 2 Apr → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 17% | 2 Apr → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.03 | 7% | 1 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.07 | 25% | 25 Mar → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 42% | 25 Mar → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.17 | 7% | 25 Mar → | ||
| 15–19 | -0.01 | 23% | 24 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 14% | 24 Mar → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.02 | 33% | 24 Mar → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 22% | 24 Mar → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 22% | 24 Mar → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 12% | 14 Mar → | ||
| 19–15 | -0.03 | 19% | 14 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.00 | 25% | 14 Mar → | ||
| 16–12 | -0.03 | 16% | 12 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 21% | 12 Mar → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 13% | 12 Mar → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 33% | 12 Mar → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 14% | 9 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 13% | 8 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 21% | 8 Mar → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 40% | 7 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 32% | 7 Mar → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 31% | 5 Mar → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 25% | 5 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.08 | 44% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 11% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 13% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.05 | 29% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 19% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 22% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 14% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 35% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.07 | 16% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 39% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.07 | 29% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.13 | 20% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 30% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 29% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.02 | 18% | 18 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 28% | 18 Feb → |
Match data via Leetify.