GuruJEE

GuruJEE — CS2 Stats

PK76561198411704123[U:1:451438395]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,820Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,455Hours in CS36Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,099Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48120 of 220479 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,986 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 22,099 → 22,099
0Faceit ELO · 1,986 → 1,986
+1Tracked matches · now 1,820
0.0ppWin rate · 60.0% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 6 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,099 +2,206 7 Aug15 Sept · 25 days played
19,89322,767peak 22,7677 Aug15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,986 +0 4 Sept15 Sept · 2 observations
1,9861,986peak 1,9864 Sept15 Sept
22,767Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,986Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2025-08-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,986
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 15 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 668 below peak (22,767)
  • +1,598 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,901 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate49.3%48.3%51.0%1.7% short
Shot accuracy12.3%13.2%13.7%1.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.251.071.09above
Match win rate46.1%46.9%48.4%2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGuruJEEFACEITLevel 9 · 1,986 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,099 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,986csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning54
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateWLLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −81ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility3.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.4
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time633ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 716ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · overpass, 5 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 2 Nov
359msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 20 Aug
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 5 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 11ancientWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28131546%0.00
dust2S2718967%0.01
ancientD1641225%-0.00
infernoS119282%-0.00
nukeC83538%0.03
cache43175%-0.01
overpass42250%0.02
anubis21150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

149,990Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
5,598Matches
46.1%Match win rate
49.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12.3%Shot accuracy
14,326MVPs
2,418Hours (in match)
4,869Bombs planted
1,152Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,765
AWP39,245
FAMAS4,840
MAC-102,914
MP92,007

Lifetime map wins

16,363dust2
7,851inferno
2,255vertigo
1,581nuke
497train
46cbble
7office
4ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,670Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
75.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage42854%1.1016.9
Ancient25555%1.0815.6
Dust222355%0.9915.4
Anubis12439%1.0015.5
Inferno12149%1.0415.3
Vertigo10042%1.0316.1
Nuke4850%0.9415.8
Cache1872%1.0517.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
634msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
6.65HE damage / grenade
4.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4395 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2156% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–11-0.0428%13 Sept
ancient2–130.0224%9 Sept
mirage9–130.0210%23 Aug
dust211–130.0125%22 Aug
dust213–10-0.0316%22 Aug
nuke11–130.0823%21 Aug
cache13–5-0.0232%21 Aug
mirage13–100.0621%21 Aug
dust22–13-0.030%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0721%18 Aug
cache13–40.0122%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0324%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0219%7 Aug
dust213–80.0722%7 Aug
dust213–40.0729%31 Jul
dust213–100.1026%28 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0716%25 Jul
mirage13–70.0318%25 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0321%25 Jul
dust24–130.0421%25 Jul
dust213–90.0420%19 Jul
nuke9–130.0818%15 Jul
cache9–13-0.0028%15 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0516%11 Jul
mirage11–130.0819%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0315%10 Jul
overpass13–10.1220%5 Jul
dust216–130.0623%3 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0620%23 May
ancient13–70.0511%11 May
mirage5–13-0.0715%23 Apr
ancient14–160.0515%21 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0625%5 Apr
nuke11–130.0221%5 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0015%4 Apr
mirage2–12-0.0415%4 Apr
inferno13–50.0217%4 Apr
mirage11–130.0615%22 Mar
dust213–70.0330%21 Mar
dust213–20.0926%21 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0114%20 Mar
mirage13–30.0316%20 Mar
dust213–11-0.0214%20 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0211%20 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0611%16 Mar
dust26–13-0.0218%13 Mar
dust213–9-0.0128%30 Jan
ancient10–130.0617%30 Jan
nuke8–13-0.1124%19 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0518%15 Jan
mirage13–80.0422%20 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0213%18 Nov
nuke13–90.0115%15 Nov
dust213–60.0824%14 Nov
mirage13–100.0425%7 Nov
ancient5–130.0117%2 Nov
dust22–13-0.0650%2 Nov
mirage10–130.0015%2 Oct
dust211–13-0.0227%18 Sept
overpass13–40.0713%10 Sept
ancient12–160.0216%9 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0115%2 Sept
inferno13–70.0816%21 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0221%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0824%14 Aug
mirage13–40.0222%14 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0524%14 Aug
mirage16–140.0325%14 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0822%14 Aug
dust210–130.0421%13 Aug
inferno13–80.0133%12 Aug
overpass3–13-0.0518%11 Aug
mirage13–60.0326%11 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0223%11 Aug
nuke12–160.0434%11 Aug
dust213–10-0.0023%11 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0227%11 Aug
mirage7–130.0125%11 Aug
ancient13–11-0.009%10 Aug
ancient13–80.0430%10 Aug
dust213–10-0.0428%10 Aug
dust213–7-0.0324%10 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0829%8 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0120%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0520%8 Aug
mirage13–30.0229%8 Aug
mirage4–10-0.0420%8 Aug
dust25–130.0032%7 Aug
dust213–9-0.0126%7 Aug
dust213–20.0839%7 Aug
mirage9–130.0124%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0629%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0320%7 Aug
nuke13–50.0344%7 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0819%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0619%7 Aug
dust213–110.0022%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0631%6 Aug
anubis13–40.0732%6 Aug
nuke13–90.0831%6 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →