ⓡⓐⓢⓜⓤⓢ

ⓡⓐⓢⓜⓤⓢ — CS2 Stats

76561198402148683[U:1:441882955]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

909Tracked matches38%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating2.4 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,540Light Blue band · top ~66.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,540 -4,044 8 Sept – 25 Oct · 23 days played
7,13912,359peak 12,3598 Sept25 Oct
12,359Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,819 below peak (12,359)
  • -3,452 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 2,460 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGⓡⓐⓢⓜⓤⓢFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER7,540 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim24
Positioning44
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY34–62–4Last 10034%Win rateWWLWTWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim2.4
Utility4.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 53% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.4
Positioning4.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics0.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact1.0

Composite 2.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time630ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 15 Sept →
27%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · italy, 13 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 12 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 25 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 36% over 28vertigoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2810–1836%-0.01
nukeD155–1033%0.01
mirageC114–736%0.01
anubisC114–736%-0.01
ancientC114–736%-0.01
dust2D72–529%-0.02
vertigoD51–420%0.02
cache—41–325%-0.04
overpass—20–20%-0.01
poseidon—21–150%0.07
italy—11–0100%0.01
train—10–10%-0.09
debris—11–0100%0.02
eldorado—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches
52%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
67.7ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1060%0.6811.6
Inferno956%0.7814.2
Nuke540%1.0615.6
Overpass250%0.5710.0
Anubis250%0.6210.0
Mirage1100%0.9416.0
Train10%0.5511.0
Dust210%0.7014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
52.9%Counter-strafing
13.6°Preaim
626msReaction time
40.3%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
5.46HE damage / grenade
10.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.5883° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4323 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0123%27 Oct →
nuke13–100.0217%27 Oct →
dust211–130.0222%25 Oct →
nuke13–00.068%25 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0811%25 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0312%20 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0119%20 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0224%19 Oct →
anubis9–130.0216%19 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0410%16 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.049%16 Oct →
anubis13–70.0522%16 Oct →
nuke9–130.0113%15 Oct →
anubis5–130.0018%15 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0215%15 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0612%14 Oct →
inferno9–60.0214%14 Oct →
inferno13–50.012%14 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0411%14 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0519%14 Oct →
overpass6–13-0.0014%13 Oct →
italy13–100.0127%13 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0418%12 Oct →
nuke4–130.0012%12 Oct →
mirage2–130.0111%12 Oct →
nuke13–60.1219%12 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0317%12 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0111%11 Oct →
nuke13–40.0617%11 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0416%11 Oct →
vertigo4–130.0014%11 Oct →
mirage5–130.1418%11 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.028%9 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0116%9 Oct →
dust28–130.019%6 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0424%6 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0414%6 Oct →
nuke9–60.1116%6 Oct →
inferno9–40.0314%6 Oct →
inferno0–11-0.0412%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0312%2 Oct →
nuke2–10-0.0417%2 Oct →
ancient8–130.0214%1 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.035%1 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0612%30 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.0116%30 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0313%29 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.038%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0413%28 Sept →
overpass3–13-0.038%25 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0712%25 Sept →
train4–13-0.0916%25 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.028%25 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0413%25 Sept →
inferno13–100.0312%25 Sept →
inferno14–160.0017%24 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.038%22 Sept →
inferno9–40.0611%22 Sept →
inferno8–80.0118%22 Sept →
inferno5–90.0321%22 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0426%22 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0112%22 Sept →
mirage13–90.0915%22 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0515%21 Sept →
anubis13–90.1115%21 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.032%21 Sept →
ancient13–110.0417%21 Sept →
inferno11–130.0111%21 Sept →
cache7–130.0010%21 Sept →
vertigo3–9-0.0619%21 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.1011%21 Sept →
mirage13–20.0316%21 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.046%21 Sept →
inferno8–130.0116%21 Sept →
ancient16–130.0311%18 Sept →
ancient11–130.048%18 Sept →
inferno6–20.024%18 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.017%17 Sept →
ancient3–130.0123%17 Sept →
anubis13–80.0614%16 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0915%16 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.0315%16 Sept →
debris9–30.0212%16 Sept →
eldorado6–9-0.0214%16 Sept →
poseidon9–70.0617%16 Sept →
poseidon7–90.0710%15 Sept →
vertigo9–30.1812%15 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0325%15 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1018%15 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0118%15 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.018%13 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0113%12 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.069%12 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0719%11 Sept →
inferno14–160.0521%11 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.027%11 Sept →
inferno13–90.0112%8 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.070%8 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.080%8 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0622%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.