Diana

Diana — CS2 Stats

CW76561198401078579[U:1:440812851]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,300Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
5,287Hours in CS44Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,406 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,103 +204 20 Feb – 15 Jun · 16 days played
9,61311,668peak 11,66820 Feb15 Jun
11,668Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,406Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
78Days played since 2026-02-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,406
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 125 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate41.5%46.8%48.2%6.7% short
Shot accuracy12.7%13.0%13.2%0.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.841.061.070.23 short
Match win rate42.5%46.3%46.9%4.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDianaFACEITLevel 8 · 1,406 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,406csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning46
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–56–1Last 10043%Win rateWLLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time608ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 9 Mar →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 2 Oct →
445msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 6 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 5 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
7–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 24infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2914–1548%-0.01
mirageB2412–1250%-0.01
ancientC187–1139%-0.01
anubisD113–827%-0.03
infernoD82–625%-0.03
nukeD62–433%-0.03
cache—22–0100%0.03
overpass—21–150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

106,523Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
6,418Matches
42.5%Match win rate
41.5%Headshot %
12.7%Shot accuracy
12,688MVPs
2,765Hours (in match)
6,620Bombs planted
969Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,036
AWP12,352
FAMAS3,418
MP92,363
Knife1,843

Lifetime map wins

16,651dust2
5,297inferno
1,620train
1,511vertigo
1,423nuke
153cbble
67dust
30aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,919Matches
49%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
75.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage60253%0.9315.1
Dust241050%0.8814.5
Ancient24243%0.9115.0
Anubis23047%0.9013.9
Inferno7544%0.8914.7
Nuke4745%0.9415.1
Train2348%0.8914.3
Overpass1753%0.8915.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
609msReaction time
44.9%T opening success
44.4%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
9.13HE damage / grenade
12.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.0112%12 Nov →
dust210–130.0621%9 Nov →
dust23–130.0313%6 Nov →
anubis13–100.0012%28 Oct →
dust213–30.0216%25 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0517%24 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0124%16 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0524%14 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0326%10 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0716%4 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.059%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0318%2 Oct →
inferno7–90.0114%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0346%2 Oct →
mirage13–80.0726%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0316%25 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0022%25 Sept →
cache13–30.0210%19 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0318%17 Sept →
ancient14–160.0420%13 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.078%12 Sept →
ancient13–70.0221%12 Sept →
dust213–110.0116%11 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0219%10 Sept →
nuke13–100.0117%9 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0217%8 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0412%6 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0212%3 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0816%3 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0318%1 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0515%1 Sept →
cache13–40.0319%25 Aug →
mirage19–17-0.0215%24 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0623%23 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0311%23 Aug →
anubis13–60.0316%22 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0415%16 Aug →
anubis7–130.0213%15 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0016%14 Aug →
dust210–130.0325%11 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0223%11 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0511%10 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0315%9 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0512%8 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0219%8 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0312%8 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0620%6 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0718%3 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.1533%30 Jul →
ancient13–100.0216%26 Jul →
dust213–30.0211%24 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0128%17 Jul →
mirage9–130.0119%13 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0313%9 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0717%9 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0312%7 Jul →
nuke13–2-0.059%5 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0317%30 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0417%29 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0023%28 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0315%24 Jun →
mirage13–20.010%23 Jun →
dust213–90.0413%15 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.075%14 Jun →
mirage13–90.0221%14 Jun →
ancient13–90.0311%12 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0719%6 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0315%27 May →
anubis9–13-0.0022%23 May →
ancient5–80.0927%23 May →
dust26–13-0.1013%11 May →
ancient13–8-0.038%11 May →
dust213–50.0411%30 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0512%26 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0413%23 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0213%23 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0611%22 Apr →
mirage13–90.0310%21 Apr →
mirage15–15-0.0510%20 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0124%17 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0513%14 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0334%13 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0227%5 Apr →
dust216–130.0124%2 Apr →
mirage16–130.0426%1 Apr →
inferno13–40.0625%1 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0813%29 Mar →
dust213–70.0118%28 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0116%24 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0422%13 Mar →
inferno7–9-0.0023%13 Mar →
inferno7–9-0.1624%13 Mar →
mirage13–50.0916%9 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0319%24 Feb →
dust213–100.0714%24 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0216%23 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0512%21 Feb →
overpass13–7-0.036%21 Feb →
dust216–130.029%21 Feb →
dust25–13-0.0112%20 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.