EosVII

EosVII — CS2 Stats

76561198394203766[U:1:433938038]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

516Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,435Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating19,892Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#81815 of 242475 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,591 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 9 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,892 +2,340 12 Jul – 18 Sept · 20 days played
17,55220,355peak 20,35512 Jul18 Sept
20,355Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,591Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-07-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,591
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 160 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 463 below peak (20,355)
  • -217 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 108 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,280), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.8%45.7%46.8%4.0% short
Shot accuracy15.8%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.141.051.06above
Match win rate47.5%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEosVIIFACEITLevel 7 · 1,591 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,892 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,591csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning56
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLLWWLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +5.9pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.8
Utility5.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time542ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · vertigo, 14 Aug →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 9 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 10 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 18 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB1910–953%0.02
ancientB199–1047%0.01
dust2B136–746%0.01
cacheA138–562%0.01
anubisB136–746%-0.01
infernoB115–645%0.01
mirageD92–722%-0.03
vertigo—32–167%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,774Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
1,621Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
42.8%Headshot %
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
3,960MVPs
652Hours (in match)
1,101Bombs planted
401Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,875nuke
2,286inferno
1,563vertigo
510dust2
381train
86office
26cbble
22italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

162Matches
52%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
83.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1963%1.2816.9
Inferno1833%0.9915.6
Overpass1662%1.3417.2
Ancient1464%1.3516.6
Mirage1127%0.9616.6
Cache667%1.1616.8
Anubis40%0.8614.0
Vertigo450%1.0514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
543msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
60.4%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
9.46HE damage / grenade
8.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2962% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.0327%18 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0130%18 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0526%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0423%14 Sept →
nuke13–100.0218%14 Sept →
cache10–130.0318%14 Sept →
ancient9–130.0114%14 Sept →
cache13–80.0821%13 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0427%25 Aug →
inferno12–120.0011%23 Aug →
nuke13–90.049%23 Aug →
dust216–140.0521%16 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0711%15 Aug →
nuke12–120.0222%15 Aug →
anubis13–50.0623%15 Aug →
cache16–130.0319%15 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.014%15 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0116%15 Aug →
ancient13–100.019%14 Aug →
cache13–10.0325%14 Aug →
nuke13–50.0112%14 Aug →
vertigo13–50.1427%14 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.038%14 Aug →
dust211–130.0310%14 Aug →
cache13–3-0.049%14 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0322%14 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0814%12 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.039%12 Aug →
nuke13–100.0122%12 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0914%10 Aug →
nuke13–60.0316%10 Aug →
cache17–190.0414%9 Aug →
ancient13–110.0717%9 Aug →
ancient13–10.0024%9 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0417%9 Aug →
nuke13–30.0615%9 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0022%9 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.064%9 Aug →
anubis5–130.0011%8 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0321%8 Aug →
vertigo13–70.0221%8 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0220%25 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0213%24 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0113%24 Jul →
nuke13–20.0715%24 Jul →
anubis13–100.0816%23 Jul →
dust213–50.0817%22 Jul →
inferno13–30.089%22 Jul →
ancient6–130.1014%22 Jul →
anubis1–13-0.0323%22 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0120%21 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0624%21 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.084%20 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0220%18 Jul →
ancient13–110.0816%18 Jul →
inferno10–130.0411%18 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0220%18 Jul →
dust213–00.0421%18 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0316%18 Jul →
anubis9–130.0228%18 Jul →
dust213–20.0627%18 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.049%17 Jul →
nuke13–70.0116%17 Jul →
cache9–13-0.008%17 Jul →
cache16–120.0123%17 Jul →
nuke7–130.0716%17 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0218%17 Jul →
inferno13–110.0018%15 Jul →
inferno13–20.0323%15 Jul →
cache13–60.044%15 Jul →
mirage8–130.0217%15 Jul →
anubis9–20.0417%15 Jul →
nuke12–160.0214%13 Jul →
inferno13–80.0622%13 Jul →
ancient13–70.0317%13 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0611%13 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.0717%13 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0415%13 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0512%13 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0026%12 Jul →
ancient13–70.0319%12 Jul →
inferno11–10.0618%12 Jul →
mirage7–130.0415%12 Jul →
dust213–160.0013%12 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0116%11 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0116%11 Jul →
ancient5–130.0614%11 Jul →
nuke6–130.0614%11 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0012%11 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0318%10 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.077%10 Jul →
cache8–130.0116%10 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0117%10 Jul →
ancient3–130.0415%10 Jul →
ancient13–100.018%10 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0829%10 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0511%10 Jul →
nuke5–100.0811%9 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.069%9 Jul →
nuke13–50.0535%9 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →