GAV.EXE

GAV.EXE — CS2 Stats

IE76561198179843975[U:1:219578247]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,069Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,764Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,533Top 25% of 197,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#46851 of 245318 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,475 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,069 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 27 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,533 -1,541 5 Aug – 24 Sept · 14 days played
22,53325,538peak 25,5385 Aug24 Sept
25,722Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,475Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-07-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,475
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 56 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,005 below peak (25,538)
  • -2,060 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,467 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-24
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches23——
Win rate52%——
K/D2.06——
Headshot %65%——

Measured 28 Aug 2026 → 26 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,434), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.9%46.8%48.2%1.3% short
Shot accuracy10.6%13.0%13.3%2.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.061.07above
Match win rate44.0%46.3%46.9%2.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGAV.EXEFACEITLevel 8 · 1,475 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,533 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,475csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning45
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–52–2Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 493ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility2.3
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.5
Utility2.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time477ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 477ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–0 · cache, 2 Sept →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 14 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 2 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2614–1254%-0.02
nukeA2313–1057%-0.00
vertigoA127–558%-0.00
mirageD101–910%-0.03
cacheB84–450%0.02
infernoD82–625%-0.03
anubisD72–529%-0.03
dust2B63–350%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,551Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
2,549Matches
44.0%Match win rate
46.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
10.6%Shot accuracy
4,693MVPs
1,116Hours (in match)
2,491Bombs planted
602Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,746nuke
3,991inferno
2,885vertigo
731dust2
371train
21office
9cbble
5lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

492Matches
52%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
75.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6952%0.9615.3
Nuke6063%1.0816.3
Ancient5161%0.9514.1
Mirage4641%0.8212.6
Overpass2857%0.9114.7
Anubis1937%0.8512.7
Vertigo944%0.7011.3
Cache944%0.8112.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
474msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.24Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
10.18HE damage / grenade
2.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2424 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.8686% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.0418%21 Sept →
vertigo13–30.0110%21 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0419%18 Sept →
nuke9–130.0323%18 Sept →
ancient1–10-0.0328%17 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0535%14 Sept →
dust213–11-0.015%14 Sept →
nuke13–100.0218%14 Sept →
cache10–130.0422%14 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0014%14 Sept →
cache13–80.0113%13 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0230%13 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0725%9 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0619%9 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0025%9 Sept →
nuke9–130.0313%7 Sept →
inferno13–90.0417%7 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0120%2 Sept →
cache13–00.148%2 Sept →
vertigo13–40.054%2 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0633%2 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0610%2 Sept →
cache7–130.0125%26 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0119%26 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0616%26 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0423%25 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0113%24 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.038%24 Aug →
inferno12–120.0618%23 Aug →
nuke13–90.0121%23 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.0220%23 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0719%22 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0019%22 Aug →
nuke13–70.0015%22 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0215%22 Aug →
anubis13–60.0321%20 Aug →
anubis13–50.0021%17 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0119%16 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.057%15 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0014%15 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0222%15 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0419%15 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0411%14 Aug →
cache13–10.0654%14 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0620%14 Aug →
vertigo13–50.0010%14 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0911%14 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0615%14 Aug →
vertigo9–13-0.077%13 Aug →
mirage14–160.0223%13 Aug →
nuke13–50.0428%13 Aug →
vertigo13–40.0123%13 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.125%13 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0317%13 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0024%13 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0121%12 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0622%12 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0121%12 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0319%12 Aug →
ancient13–60.0111%12 Aug →
vertigo11–130.1017%11 Aug →
ancient13–90.0918%11 Aug →
nuke12–120.0119%11 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0416%10 Aug →
nuke13–60.1218%10 Aug →
cache17–19-0.0323%9 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0211%9 Aug →
ancient13–10.098%9 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0522%9 Aug →
nuke13–30.0938%9 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0027%9 Aug →
mirage5–130.0323%9 Aug →
vertigo13–7-0.0526%8 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0017%8 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.120%8 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0517%8 Aug →
ancient13–100.0115%8 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0725%8 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0317%6 Aug →
ancient16–12-0.0413%6 Aug →
vertigo13–7-0.0026%6 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0014%6 Aug →
inferno13–50.0227%6 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0129%6 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0314%6 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0125%6 Aug →
ancient13–80.0321%6 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0635%6 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.0618%5 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0626%5 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.075%5 Aug →
mirage8–130.0223%2 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0510%2 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0613%29 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0512%29 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0121%29 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0817%29 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0615%27 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0313%27 Jul →
ancient13–2-0.0513%27 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →