Slayer

Slayer — CS2 Stats

DE76561198393433547[U:1:433167819]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,423Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,953Hours in CS44Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,890Blue band · top ~39.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 796 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+208Premier CS Rating · 12,682 → 12,890

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,890 +4,747 6 Sept – 1 Nov · 33 days played
8,14313,787peak 13,7876 Sept1 Nov
13,787Peak Premier in tracked matches
796Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-09-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 796
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 105 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-10-04
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-10-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 897 below peak (13,787)
  • +842 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,110 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-04
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-10-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches201101+100
Win rate32%36%−3pp
K/D3.321.21+2.10
Headshot %78%58%+20pp

Measured 4 Oct 2026 → 1 Nov 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 4 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate54.3%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy1.5%12.0%12.4%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.021.03above
Match win rate25.6%44.7%45.2%19.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSlayerFACEITLevel 5 · 796 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,890 · Blue bandPEAK ELO796csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning42
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWWLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · +59ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 6%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility3.3
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 22% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.2
Utility3.3
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time589ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy10.9%−6.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 10.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 25 Sept →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 16–12 · dust2, 25 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · anubis, 12 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3116–1552%0.01
infernoA2616–1062%0.00
mirageS129–375%0.03
anubisD93–633%-0.05
nukeB84–450%-0.02
cacheB63–350%-0.03
ancient—30–30%-0.05
rush_001—32–167%0.01
office—10–10%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

161,429Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
5,855Matches
25.6%Match win rate
54.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
1.5%Shot accuracy
7,140MVPs
1,697Hours (in match)
2,882Bombs planted
1,176Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47101,045
P2505,615
FAMAS4,185
AWP1,460
SG 5531,081

Lifetime map wins

13,273dust2
6,761inferno
1,953nuke
1,501vertigo
441train
102office
18italy
4ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

854Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
70.8ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust218355%0.9513.6
Inferno16354%0.9513.1
Anubis12145%0.9413.1
Mirage7462%1.3617.4
Ancient4648%0.9314.0
Vertigo4038%0.7911.3
Overpass2060%0.9012.8
Nuke2030%0.8812.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.3%Headshot accuracy
41.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
68.1%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
583msReaction time
47.9%T opening success
22.3%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
6.45HE damage / grenade
2.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.3135% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3832 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 22.3005% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–140.018%1 Nov →
cache5–20.010%1 Nov →
inferno3–13-0.0313%1 Nov →
mirage13–4-0.045%31 Oct →
mirage7–130.005%31 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0116%30 Oct →
nuke13–110.043%30 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0619%30 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.1813%30 Oct →
dust23–130.009%28 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0216%28 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0415%28 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.1012%25 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.034%25 Oct →
dust213–70.0016%25 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.055%24 Oct →
mirage13–90.0115%23 Oct →
inferno13–100.0121%23 Oct →
dust213–100.0213%23 Oct →
inferno12–160.0210%23 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0218%23 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0212%21 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0111%18 Oct →
dust26–130.0411%18 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.059%18 Oct →
inferno13–10.020%18 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.1121%18 Oct →
inferno13–70.0916%17 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.066%17 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.039%16 Oct →
dust210–130.0416%16 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.1311%16 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.043%16 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0614%16 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0228%15 Oct →
dust213–100.0329%15 Oct →
dust213–70.1413%15 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0211%14 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.079%14 Oct →
inferno7–130.0118%14 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0010%13 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.024%13 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0520%12 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.003%12 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0715%12 Oct →
office10–13-0.017%11 Oct →
dust213–90.0017%11 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0424%11 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0120%10 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0122%10 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0116%9 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0214%9 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0115%9 Oct →
rush_0011–5-0.0227%9 Oct →
rush_0018–70.0118%9 Oct →
rush_0018–70.039%9 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0822%9 Oct →
inferno13–60.0222%9 Oct →
dust24–13-0.078%6 Oct →
dust213–5-0.079%6 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0313%3 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0113%3 Oct →
dust215–150.0316%3 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.043%3 Oct →
dust29–130.0113%2 Oct →
nuke13–50.0611%2 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.056%2 Oct →
dust213–100.1217%30 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.067%26 Sept →
inferno10–130.0715%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0112%25 Sept →
inferno13–80.1017%25 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0241%25 Sept →
dust216–120.0841%25 Sept →
inferno13–40.1138%25 Sept →
inferno13–90.1026%25 Sept →
inferno13–30.2138%25 Sept →
mirage13–50.1334%25 Sept →
mirage13–30.1231%25 Sept →
dust212–160.0414%24 Sept →
mirage13–80.059%23 Sept →
nuke13–100.027%23 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0117%19 Sept →
dust213–50.0124%19 Sept →
inferno13–90.068%18 Sept →
dust24–130.009%18 Sept →
dust24–12-0.056%18 Sept →
mirage13–90.069%18 Sept →
dust213–110.0515%18 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0712%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0610%16 Sept →
mirage13–70.0121%15 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0017%12 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.098%11 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0212%11 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.144%11 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0115%11 Sept →
dust213–40.0524%10 Sept →
dust210–130.0211%6 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0216%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.