Arne skrydsbøl

Arne skrydsbøl — CS2 Stats

DK76561198384135380[U:1:423869652]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,135Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,161Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#86093 of 257425 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,555 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,899 -494 29 Aug – 22 Sept · 13 days played
18,87120,393peak 20,39329 Aug22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,555 +0 2 Sept – 4 Sept · 2 observations
1,5551,555peak 1,5552 Sept4 Sept
20,612Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,555Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,555
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 196 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,512), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.6%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy10.6%13.0%13.2%2.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.061.070.07 short
Match win rate45.7%46.3%46.9%1.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGArne skrydsbølFACEITLevel 8 · 1,555 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,555csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning71
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–43–8Last 10049%Win rateLLWWWLWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.3
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time555ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–4 · debris, 25 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 8–6 · rush_001, 29 Sept →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 5 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
debrisB2513–1252%0.01
mirageC207–1335%0.01
nukeA159–660%0.01
dust2C135–838%0.02
cacheS128–467%0.02
infernoB105–550%0.01
ancient—41–325%-0.00
rush_001—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,414Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
4,344Matches
45.7%Match win rate
50.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
10.6%Shot accuracy
13,835MVPs
1,652Hours (in match)
6,332Bombs planted
3,031Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,899
AWP6,923
P2502,135
MAC-101,141
SSG 081,095
MP9999

Lifetime map wins

7,449dust2
4,846inferno
3,298cbble
2,777nuke
2,303train
512vertigo
348office
172italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

59Matches
49%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
86.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1872%1.3317.2
Nuke650%1.1715.8
Dust2520%0.9514.2
Ancient450%1.4417.3
Inferno250%1.0015.5
Cache20%1.3421.0
Anubis10%0.8815.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
548msReaction time
57.3%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.72HE damage / grenade
8.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–130.0214%22 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0416%20 Oct →
rush_0018–6-0.0450%29 Sept →
cache13–70.0435%25 Sept →
inferno13–30.0840%23 Sept →
cache7–130.0419%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0420%22 Sept →
inferno8–130.0120%22 Sept →
nuke13–80.0822%22 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0124%21 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0128%21 Sept →
cache13–110.0524%21 Sept →
mirage3–130.0322%21 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.019%20 Sept →
dust213–60.039%20 Sept →
cache13–100.0617%20 Sept →
mirage11–130.0114%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0225%20 Sept →
dust213–40.1227%20 Sept →
nuke13–110.0516%19 Sept →
cache13–20.0423%19 Sept →
nuke11–130.0114%16 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0610%16 Sept →
ancient8–130.0014%16 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0311%16 Sept →
nuke13–90.0717%10 Sept →
mirage13–70.0828%9 Sept →
cache13–20.1419%9 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0417%8 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0327%8 Sept →
nuke11–130.0418%8 Sept →
inferno9–60.0738%8 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0211%7 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.069%7 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0016%5 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0220%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0516%4 Sept →
mirage13–110.0433%4 Sept →
dust29–130.0022%2 Sept →
inferno13–100.0245%2 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0710%31 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0110%31 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0416%30 Aug →
mirage10–130.0216%29 Aug →
dust213–160.0212%29 Aug →
mirage13–80.0215%29 Aug →
mirage9–130.0421%29 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0618%28 Aug →
ancient7–130.0124%28 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0016%28 Aug →
nuke7–130.0514%27 Aug →
mirage6–130.0122%27 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0440%26 Aug →
dust215–150.0529%26 Aug →
nuke13–90.0420%26 Aug →
debris8–80.0212%26 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0515%24 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.019%24 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0314%24 Aug →
inferno8–80.0219%24 Aug →
nuke16–120.0215%23 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0221%23 Aug →
dust212–120.0310%22 Aug →
mirage13–20.1134%19 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0917%19 Aug →
nuke9–30.1438%11 Aug →
nuke1–9-0.239%11 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0318%9 Aug →
ancient13–110.0021%2 Aug →
mirage13–50.0021%2 Aug →
dust213–20.0631%2 Aug →
debris9–7-0.0316%28 Jul →
debris1–9-0.1311%28 Jul →
cache13–60.0129%27 Jul →
debris8–8-0.0812%26 Jul →
debris5–9-0.086%26 Jul →
debris9–40.1619%26 Jul →
debris5–90.0438%26 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.017%26 Jul →
debris9–30.1025%25 Jul →
debris8–8-0.0016%25 Jul →
debris9–50.2017%25 Jul →
debris9–40.2123%25 Jul →
debris9–6-0.0413%25 Jul →
debris9–70.0027%25 Jul →
dust27–130.0125%25 Jul →
dust213–80.0421%25 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0128%25 Jul →
debris3–9-0.0915%25 Jul →
debris9–60.0522%25 Jul →
debris9–10.0415%25 Jul →
debris9–7-0.0324%25 Jul →
debris7–90.0217%25 Jul →
debris3–9-0.1014%25 Jul →
debris9–40.1024%25 Jul →
debris9–60.1123%25 Jul →
debris8–80.0622%25 Jul →
debris3–9-0.0719%25 Jul →
debris1–9-0.1710%25 Jul →
debris9–50.0319%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.