60 fps laptop gamer

60 fps laptop gamer — CS2 Stats

76561198374244380[U:1:413978652]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

841Tracked matches22%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,097Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.0 LearningClutch Specialist
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 681 → 681
+2Tracked matches · now 841
0.0ppWin rate · 22.2% → 22.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 9 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

681Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-06-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 681
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 70 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 14 Sep 2026 and 19 Sep 2026.

Measured 14 Sep 202619 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG60 fps laptop gamerPEAK ELO681csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning25
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD325711Last 10032%Win rateLLWLWLLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +124ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 834ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 857ms

Last 20

  • 4133 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 795ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.2 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility1.5
Positioning2.5
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch7.2

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 799ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning2.5
Utility1.5
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time801ms+49ms
first ⅓ avg 752ms → last ⅓ avg 801ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 17 Jun
54%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · vertigo, 9 Jun
531msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 12 Jul
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 11 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 44% over 9anubisWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD1531220%-0.03
cacheD1441029%-0.03
dust2D124833%-0.04
mirageC104640%-0.03
ancientC94544%-0.03
vertigoC83538%-0.02
overpassC73443%-0.05
anubisD7070%-0.03
trainC52340%-0.02
inferno3030%-0.07
shelter220100%-0.01
office21150%0.01
grail110100%-0.05
fachwerk1010%-0.06
boulder1010%-0.00
stronghold110100%-0.04
alpine1010%-0.11
warden1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,595Lifetime kills
0.69K/D
1,661Matches
39.6%Match win rate
47.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
12.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
2,236MVPs
623Hours (in match)
413Bombs planted
179Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,638inferno
1,764dust2
1,576nuke
1,004vertigo
913train
111cbble
90office
38lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

362Matches
44%Win rate
0.68Avg K/D
61.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

56%1v1 clutch win
6%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2365%0.7811.0
Dust21450%0.9813.3
Anubis1050%0.7410.3
Cache911%0.519.7
Train838%0.6611.6
Inferno757%0.7412.6
Overpass617%0.468.3
Ancient540%0.8513.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
799msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
32.5%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
0.39HE damage / grenade
3.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 798.5651ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.386 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3262% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust21–13-0.0737%13 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0518%11 Sept
dust213–9-0.0622%1 Aug
ancient8–13-0.1013%20 Jul
shelter13–110.0116%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1115%18 Jul
mirage9–130.0113%18 Jul
office13–80.0128%18 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0524%18 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0326%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.0312%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0517%18 Jul
cache10–13-0.0921%18 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0610%18 Jul
dust213–10-0.0622%18 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0917%18 Jul
cache12–12-0.0033%18 Jul
overpass10–13-0.0520%13 Jul
vertigo5–130.0328%13 Jul
dust20–13-0.0233%12 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0613%12 Jul
nuke13–70.0319%12 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0434%12 Jul
inferno1–13-0.107%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.103%12 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0710%12 Jul
nuke7–13-0.043%12 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0423%12 Jul
grail13–9-0.0521%12 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0838%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.1013%11 Jul
dust210–130.0122%10 Jul
nuke5–13-0.028%10 Jul
shelter13–8-0.0411%9 Jul
dust213–90.0218%9 Jul
dust28–130.0114%9 Jul
cache3–13-0.0936%9 Jul
fachwerk4–13-0.0628%9 Jul
boulder8–13-0.0038%8 Jul
cache13–10-0.0931%8 Jul
inferno12–12-0.078%8 Jul
dust212–12-0.118%8 Jul
overpass13–6-0.1030%8 Jul
dust213–11-0.0320%8 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0724%27 Jun
cache4–13-0.0421%27 Jun
dust20–13-0.0150%27 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0235%27 Jun
office6–130.0128%27 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0810%25 Jun
nuke6–70.0112%25 Jun
train12–12-0.0313%20 Jun
ancient13–70.0130%19 Jun
train6–12-0.0327%19 Jun
dust29–13-0.0127%19 Jun
cache13–8-0.0735%19 Jun
vertigo5–13-0.0550%18 Jun
stronghold13–7-0.0423%18 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0414%18 Jun
overpass12–12-0.0423%18 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0622%18 Jun
alpine8–13-0.1113%18 Jun
cache7–13-0.0124%17 Jun
train13–70.0329%17 Jun
vertigo10–13-0.1014%17 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0513%17 Jun
mirage13–90.1224%17 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0112%17 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0523%16 Jun
train5–13-0.0629%16 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0319%16 Jun
mirage13–20.0622%11 Jun
train13–90.0018%11 Jun
warden10–13-0.108%11 Jun
vertigo13–110.0328%11 Jun
overpass13–110.0223%11 Jun
ancient11–130.0518%11 Jun
cache13–30.0128%11 Jun
ancient13–60.0116%9 Jun
cache12–12-0.0025%9 Jun
vertigo7–13-0.0554%9 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0736%9 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0625%9 Jun
vertigo13–10-0.0539%9 Jun
nuke6–60.0713%9 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0510%9 Jun
nuke1–130.0224%9 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0128%9 Jun
nuke8–130.0013%9 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0322%9 Jun
cache9–13-0.0314%9 Jun
vertigo13–90.0816%9 Jun
cache7–130.0422%9 Jun
cache2–13-0.0229%9 Jun
cache13–100.0325%9 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0115%9 Jun
anubis10–130.0217%9 Jun
dust23–13-0.0817%9 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0618%9 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0425%9 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →