F@mØN

F@mØN — CS2 Stats

CH76561198372083297[U:1:411817569]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,335Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,423Hours in CS48Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,111Top 10% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19190 of 248200 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,111 +3,091 16 Aug – 2 Oct · 25 days played
21,31325,510peak 25,51016 Aug2 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,628 +0 28 Aug – 6 Sept · 3 observations
1,6281,628peak 1,62828 Aug6 Sept
25,510Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,628Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,628
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 399 below peak (25,510)
  • +3,064 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,889 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches240——
Win rate20%——
K/D0.72——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,318), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate41.8%49.2%50.7%8.9% short
Shot accuracy13.0%13.4%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.121.121.180.06 short
Match win rate36.6%48.5%51.9%15.3% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGF@mØNPREMIER25,111 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,628csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning66
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–42–7Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 444ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 471ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.6
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 67% on T to 47% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.6
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time473ms+38ms
first ⅓ avg 435ms → last ⅓ avg 473ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 8–8 · inferno, 21 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 26 Sept →
313msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 100% over 6anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3519–1654%-0.00
mirageB2211–1150%0.02
infernoB157–847%0.02
anubisD102–820%-0.03
nukeA74–357%0.03
ancientS66–0100%0.02
cacheC52–340%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

290,939Lifetime kills
1.12K/D
11,911Matches
36.6%Match win rate
41.8%Headshot %
13.0%Shot accuracy
23,843MVPs
3,928Hours (in match)
4,597Bombs planted
2,081Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4782,658
AWP82,244
SSG 087,504
Knife4,234
P2503,019

Lifetime map wins

21,430dust2
6,205inferno
2,469nuke
2,173vertigo
1,784train
1,702office
296cbble
268lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

142Matches
58%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
95.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2744%1.3620.4
Dust22181%1.6120.1
Inferno1669%1.3520.1
Vertigo1164%1.1517.4
Nuke1136%1.0616.9
Anubis933%1.0319.1
Ancient850%1.6018.0
Overpass20%1.2824.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
6.7°Preaim
469msReaction time
67.1%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
7.06HE damage / grenade
2.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.7157 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0616%3 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0125%3 Oct →
anubis13–80.0022%2 Oct →
nuke13–90.018%2 Oct →
ancient13–90.0229%2 Oct →
mirage7–130.0130%2 Oct →
cache8–130.0024%2 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0813%2 Oct →
mirage13–30.0211%29 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0017%27 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0317%27 Sept →
cache13–30.0714%27 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.1218%27 Sept →
dust212–120.0418%27 Sept →
inferno13–100.0814%26 Sept →
mirage13–70.0118%26 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0219%26 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.099%26 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0550%26 Sept →
inferno13–50.0413%26 Sept →
inferno8–130.0727%26 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0414%25 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0514%25 Sept →
inferno6–130.0342%25 Sept →
mirage11–130.0018%25 Sept →
mirage12–120.0122%24 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0210%24 Sept →
dust29–130.0228%24 Sept →
ancient13–80.0924%23 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0524%23 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0610%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0326%23 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0726%23 Sept →
anubis10–130.0211%23 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0424%22 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0113%21 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.015%21 Sept →
inferno8–80.1818%21 Sept →
mirage13–80.1033%20 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0144%20 Sept →
nuke16–140.0311%20 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0722%20 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0033%19 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0310%19 Sept →
ancient13–40.004%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.1220%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0413%19 Sept →
dust213–60.0817%17 Sept →
nuke3–130.0219%15 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0316%15 Sept →
mirage13–50.0831%15 Sept →
dust213–70.0325%13 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0514%12 Sept →
dust216–130.0321%12 Sept →
mirage13–110.0726%11 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0211%11 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0631%9 Sept →
dust213–20.0017%6 Sept →
inferno13–90.1133%6 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0219%5 Sept →
mirage10–130.0223%5 Sept →
inferno8–1-0.0229%5 Sept →
inferno13–70.0217%5 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0230%5 Sept →
dust211–130.0420%3 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0418%3 Sept →
anubis9–130.0113%2 Sept →
nuke13–110.1023%30 Aug →
mirage16–140.0314%30 Aug →
dust213–50.0733%30 Aug →
cache6–130.0118%30 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0113%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0217%30 Aug →
cache13–90.0424%29 Aug →
dust210–130.0422%29 Aug →
nuke13–80.0718%29 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.057%29 Aug →
nuke4–130.0624%28 Aug →
dust25–130.0625%28 Aug →
dust210–130.0615%27 Aug →
inferno12–160.0130%27 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0811%26 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0326%24 Aug →
mirage16–140.0317%23 Aug →
dust213–110.0128%23 Aug →
anubis15–150.0223%22 Aug →
mirage13–160.0320%22 Aug →
mirage6–130.0325%22 Aug →
ancient13–60.0721%22 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0017%20 Aug →
mirage6–130.0026%19 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0320%19 Aug →
mirage15–150.1022%18 Aug →
mirage13–20.0144%17 Aug →
mirage13–30.0216%17 Aug →
dust213–100.0019%16 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0513%16 Aug →
dust214–160.0241%16 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0417%16 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.0522%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.