Zer0es - Theo

Zer0es - Theo — CS2 Stats

HM76561198368257278[U:1:407991550]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,284Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,754Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20314 of 226709 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,291 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,999 → 24,999
0Faceit ELO · 2,291 → 2,291
+18Tracked matches · now 1,284
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 62 days played since 16 Feb 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +3,322 27 Jun14 Sept · 15 days played
16,06424,999peak 24,99927 Jun14 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,291Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
62Days played since 2024-02-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,291
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 209 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,999
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate49.8%48.3%51.0%1.2% short
Shot accuracy16.6%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.061.071.090.03 short
Match win rate44.6%46.9%48.4%3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZer0es - TheoFACEITLevel 9 · 2,291 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,291csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning46
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54442Last 10054%Win rateWWWLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time611ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−6.2%
first ⅓ avg 26.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 9 Aug
60%Best headshot accuracy · 5–1 · ancient, 22 Apr
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 3 Feb
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 28 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2381535%-0.03
ancientA1810856%0.01
dust2A138562%-0.01
infernoS128467%0.02
nukeA117464%0.02
anubisD103730%-0.01
overpassS98189%0.01
cache110100%-0.06
train1010%-0.03
thera110100%0.13
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

134,267Lifetime kills
1.06K/D
5,074Matches
44.6%Match win rate
49.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
16,033MVPs
3,227Hours (in match)
3,014Bombs planted
1,972Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,343
AWP19,970
Knife2,668
P2502,182
SSG 082,086
SG 5532,015

Lifetime map wins

8,393dust2
8,379inferno
3,125nuke
2,287train
1,616vertigo
798cbble
88lake
79safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,640Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
78.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212457%1.0115.0
Mirage11548%1.0315.7
Inferno6952%0.9916.0
Ancient6847%1.1816.8
Anubis4141%0.9214.5
Nuke3949%0.9515.4
Overpass2544%0.9714.4
Train2148%0.9815.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
613msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
9.64HE damage / grenade
9.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2248% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0517%5 Sept
cache13–9-0.0613%8 Aug
dust213–00.1220%28 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0321%20 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0132%1 Jul
ancient13–90.0424%11 May
inferno4–13-0.0631%7 May
nuke13–80.0827%7 May
mirage13–9-0.0323%7 May
dust28–13-0.0918%22 Feb
overpass12–16-0.0215%17 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0215%17 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0724%17 Feb
overpass13–110.0517%10 Feb
mirage13–40.0624%9 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0319%8 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0416%4 Feb
inferno13–60.0111%4 Feb
mirage5–13-0.1011%3 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0333%3 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0229%3 Feb
mirage11–130.0611%30 Jan
dust213–60.0112%30 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0117%30 Jan
inferno13–60.0018%28 Jan
dust213–50.0610%27 Jan
dust28–13-0.0415%27 Jan
ancient13–00.0126%27 Jan
nuke13–80.0322%24 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0615%24 Jan
ancient8–0-0.0118%24 Jan
mirage13–90.0422%24 Jan
mirage13–80.0425%20 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0614%14 Jan
anubis13–40.0724%14 Jan
train10–13-0.0315%25 Dec
overpass13–40.0131%5 Dec
nuke15–15-0.0020%3 Nov
overpass13–40.0215%3 Nov
overpass13–70.0010%2 Nov
inferno16–130.0123%22 Aug
nuke13–90.0919%20 Aug
dust22–13-0.0621%20 Aug
overpass13–90.0215%13 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0121%11 Aug
dust213–9-0.0532%10 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0420%9 Aug
dust23–13-0.0622%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.089%25 Jul
overpass13–4-0.0215%23 Jul
anubis13–90.1327%27 Jun
nuke9–130.0024%27 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0514%27 Apr
nuke13–100.0414%24 Apr
mirage10–130.0215%23 Apr
inferno10–130.0429%23 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0021%23 Apr
inferno13–20.0120%22 Apr
ancient5–1-0.0360%22 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0420%2 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0831%11 Dec
anubis13–10-0.0130%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0729%28 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0424%28 Aug
dust213–8-0.0519%21 Aug
ancient7–10.1928%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0521%14 Aug
ancient13–160.0528%14 Aug
mirage2–10-0.0936%14 Aug
inferno13–20.1948%9 Aug
inferno13–60.0420%9 Aug
ancient8–130.0417%31 Jul
dust213–6-0.0624%31 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0627%31 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0031%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0816%31 Jul
dust213–100.1831%24 Jul
thera13–110.1333%24 Jul
dust213–2-0.0325%22 Jul
ancient13–90.0230%22 Jul
dust210–130.0220%22 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0813%21 Jul
ancient13–90.0236%21 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0433%20 Jul
nuke13–80.0134%27 Jun
ancient20–22-0.0221%9 Jun
mirage13–50.0232%22 May
ancient13–30.0313%7 Mar
mirage13–70.0320%6 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0023%6 Mar
inferno25–23-0.0128%3 Mar
mirage13–160.0020%28 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0616%25 Feb
overpass13–40.0614%25 Feb
overpass13–80.0019%22 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0940%22 Feb
vertigo5–13-0.0222%20 Feb
inferno13–110.0225%18 Feb
ancient11–130.0127%16 Feb
nuke13–110.0538%16 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →