BT1K

BT1K — CS2 Stats

AR76561198365283407[U:1:405017679]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,843Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,797Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,665 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 66 days played since 1 Mar 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,524 -2,036 7 Apr30 Dec · 27 days played
10,11117,560peak 17,5607 Apr30 Dec
17,662Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,665Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
66Days played since 2024-03-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,665
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 86 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.5%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy13.4%13.0%13.2%meets
Kill/death ratio0.891.061.070.18 short
Match win rate48.2%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBT1KFACEITLevel 8 · 1,665 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,665csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning62
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateLWLLTLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.7
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.2
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time636ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 10–13 · mirage, 7 May
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · vertigo, 2 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 4 May
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 4 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC34151944%0.03
ancientA148657%0.02
nukeB136746%0.03
dust2B137654%-0.00
infernoD113827%0.00
anubisC94544%0.03
vertigoS54180%0.04
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

155,787Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
4,906Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
52.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
12,992MVPs
3,228Hours (in match)
6,056Bombs planted
1,381Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4771,697
AWP11,013
MP93,874
MAC-102,994
Knife2,598

Lifetime map wins

12,488inferno
6,335nuke
5,358dust2
2,117vertigo
895train
40cbble
6assault
3lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,987Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
73.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage52546%0.9613.9
Anubis21343%0.9613.8
Nuke15060%1.1114.9
Ancient14751%0.9313.7
Dust213452%0.8212.5
Inferno8252%1.0814.1
Vertigo6151%0.8413.3
Overpass3352%0.8813.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
636msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
59.8%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
5.61HE damage / grenade
12.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2974% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0322%13 Sept
mirage13–40.1015%13 Sept
mirage10–130.0117%5 Sept
dust26–13-0.0122%4 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0421%22 Aug
ancient11–130.0118%22 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0714%22 Aug
nuke9–130.0116%22 Aug
dust213–9-0.0429%22 Aug
dust213–110.0420%4 Jul
ancient16–130.0116%28 Jun
mirage13–90.0724%28 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0220%28 Jun
inferno13–70.0322%20 Jun
inferno7–13-0.046%4 May
dust28–13-0.0714%21 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0621%1 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0519%15 Feb
dust213–8-0.0414%7 Jan
inferno15–15-0.0213%30 Dec
dust23–13-0.0217%28 Dec
mirage16–140.0118%28 Dec
dust213–50.0522%20 Nov
mirage13–90.1127%11 Nov
inferno9–130.0325%7 Nov
dust213–160.0421%7 Nov
mirage10–130.0718%2 Nov
inferno8–130.0419%27 Oct
mirage13–50.0520%26 Oct
ancient13–80.0916%25 Oct
inferno4–13-0.0124%19 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0627%10 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0416%9 Aug
dust213–2-0.0020%8 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0625%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0621%31 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0323%16 May
mirage13–11-0.0020%5 Mar
dust213–20.0930%4 Mar
inferno13–00.0714%4 Mar
nuke13–30.1814%25 Feb
inferno4–13-0.079%11 Feb
nuke8–130.0319%5 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0127%1 Feb
anubis13–50.1619%24 Nov
ancient13–40.1215%24 Nov
inferno6–130.0320%22 Nov
mirage4–130.0822%21 Nov
dust27–13-0.0123%21 Nov
nuke13–90.0720%20 Nov
mirage7–130.0311%20 Nov
mirage4–13-0.0020%17 Oct
mirage13–10.1020%17 Oct
nuke7–13-0.0127%17 Oct
mirage13–90.0621%15 Oct
mirage4–130.0228%15 Oct
anubis4–130.0515%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0024%2 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0424%15 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0211%9 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0115%4 Jul
vertigo13–30.1635%2 Jul
dust213–8-0.0322%1 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0218%29 Jun
ancient13–60.0024%28 Jun
mirage13–90.1130%28 Jun
ancient13–40.1014%22 Jun
mirage10–130.0613%22 Jun
mirage5–130.1124%6 Jun
vertigo16–120.1115%5 Jun
ancient13–90.0620%31 May
mirage11–130.0423%29 May
mirage13–30.0519%20 May
inferno13–80.0822%18 May
anubis6–130.0417%9 May
mirage10–130.1921%7 May
ancient13–20.1228%4 May
ancient10–13-0.0221%7 Apr
mirage13–80.1427%7 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0528%10 Mar
vertigo19–16-0.0214%10 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0513%10 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0520%9 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0128%5 Mar
nuke13–80.0315%4 Mar
anubis13–6-0.057%4 Mar
overpass11–13-0.059%3 Mar
vertigo10–13-0.0119%3 Mar
mirage19–16-0.0516%3 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0022%3 Mar
anubis10–130.0115%2 Mar
vertigo13–11-0.0518%2 Mar
nuke13–80.0515%2 Mar
anubis13–60.0724%2 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0310%2 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0216%2 Mar
nuke13–90.0319%2 Mar
nuke13–70.0811%2 Mar
mirage4–13-0.079%2 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0322%1 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →