Toro๐Ÿ‚

Toro๐Ÿ‚ โ€” CS2 Stats

AR76561198230824232[U:1:270558504]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,236Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation โ€” history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Share this profile

CSDB.GGToro๐Ÿ‚FACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning61
Utility27

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53โ€“47Last 10053%Win rateWLLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’10pp win rate ยท +0.01 avg rating ยท โˆ’1.4pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’90ms reaction

Win rate โˆ’10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 5โ€“5 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 11โ€“9 ยท 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility2.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash โ€” utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 16% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.1
Utility2.7
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first โ…“ avg -0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.00
Reaction time540msโˆ’14ms
first โ…“ avg 553ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+1.4%
first โ…“ avg 18.2% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating ยท 13โ€“4 ยท vertigo, 3 Mar โ†’
48%Best headshot accuracy ยท 13โ€“2 ยท anubis, 2 Aug โ†’
375msFastest reaction time ยท 1โ€“13 ยท dust2, 10 Jul โ†’
13โ€“2Biggest win ยท anubis, 2 Aug โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
13โ€“6In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map ยท 90% over 10ancientWeakest map ยท 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3013โ€“1743%-0.01
anubisB2312โ€“1152%0.01
nukeA2112โ€“957%-0.00
vertigoS109โ€“190%0.04
ancientD72โ€“529%-0.02
overpassS54โ€“180%0.02
dust2โ€”31โ€“233%-0.03
trainโ€”10โ€“10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,159Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
85.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage34851%1.0417.0
Anubis20947%1.0716.6
Nuke13059%1.0416.4
Ancient7842%1.0116.2
Vertigo7855%1.1518.4
Dust25042%0.9514.9
Overpass2045%0.9916.6
Inferno1443%0.9915.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.0ยฐPreaim
552msReaction time
16.3%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
13.5%Flash assists
11.83HE damage / grenade
4.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.2706% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy โ†’Ancient grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13โ€“20.1448%2 Aug โ†’
dust21โ€“13-0.0814%10 Jul โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.035%5 Jul โ†’
mirage16โ€“140.0111%5 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0525%9 May โ†’
train0โ€“100.000%28 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“20.0322%20 Apr โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0017%12 Apr โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.0129%12 Apr โ†’
anubis4โ€“13-0.0217%24 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0425%23 Feb โ†’
dust217โ€“19-0.0516%2 Feb โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.0719%18 Dec โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0122%6 Apr โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.0013%6 Apr โ†’
anubis19โ€“17-0.0228%10 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.0324%10 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“16-0.079%10 Mar โ†’
vertigo19โ€“16-0.0329%10 Mar โ†’
nuke6โ€“130.0215%10 Mar โ†’
mirage2โ€“13-0.0624%9 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0611%9 Mar โ†’
vertigo13โ€“50.1028%9 Mar โ†’
overpass13โ€“80.1220%9 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.0324%8 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0215%8 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“9-0.0316%8 Mar โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0417%8 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0414%7 Mar โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.0023%7 Mar โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0922%7 Mar โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0115%7 Mar โ†’
mirage2โ€“13-0.0832%6 Mar โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.0418%6 Mar โ†’
vertigo13โ€“5-0.0313%6 Mar โ†’
vertigo13โ€“10-0.0215%6 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0120%6 Mar โ†’
ancient19โ€“170.0220%6 Mar โ†’
overpass11โ€“12-0.0619%6 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“40.0522%5 Mar โ†’
nuke12โ€“16-0.0513%5 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0224%5 Mar โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0319%5 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0329%5 Mar โ†’
overpass13โ€“8-0.0124%5 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0415%4 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“60.0922%4 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.014%4 Mar โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0714%4 Mar โ†’
vertigo13โ€“30.0716%4 Mar โ†’
anubis16โ€“14-0.075%3 Mar โ†’
nuke4โ€“13-0.0524%3 Mar โ†’
overpass13โ€“100.0230%3 Mar โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0717%3 Mar โ†’
nuke8โ€“130.0322%3 Mar โ†’
overpass19โ€“170.029%3 Mar โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.037%3 Mar โ†’
vertigo13โ€“20.1012%3 Mar โ†’
ancient9โ€“130.0316%3 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0215%3 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.1511%3 Mar โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0119%3 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“50.069%3 Mar โ†’
vertigo13โ€“40.2122%3 Mar โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0312%3 Mar โ†’
anubis10โ€“13-0.0519%2 Mar โ†’
vertigo13โ€“11-0.0112%2 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“8-0.0126%2 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“60.0217%2 Mar โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0121%2 Mar โ†’
anubis11โ€“130.0420%2 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“9-0.0016%2 Mar โ†’
vertigo19โ€“220.0117%2 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0116%2 Mar โ†’
nuke16โ€“12-0.0226%2 Mar โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0226%1 Mar โ†’
anubis10โ€“130.0121%1 Mar โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0517%29 Feb โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0517%29 Feb โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0424%29 Feb โ†’
anubis13โ€“20.0521%29 Feb โ†’
nuke14โ€“16-0.025%29 Feb โ†’
anubis9โ€“13-0.0213%29 Feb โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.0135%29 Feb โ†’
ancient2โ€“13-0.0912%29 Feb โ†’
vertigo13โ€“80.038%28 Feb โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.0132%28 Feb โ†’
mirage13โ€“16-0.0112%27 Feb โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.0022%27 Feb โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.033%27 Feb โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0215%26 Feb โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0419%24 Feb โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.000%24 Feb โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0416%23 Feb โ†’
ancient9โ€“130.0022%23 Feb โ†’
nuke13โ€“8-0.0316%22 Feb โ†’
anubis13โ€“110.0224%22 Feb โ†’
nuke13โ€“7-0.0121%22 Feb โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0220%20 Feb โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.0223%20 Feb โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’