Syffør

Syffør — CS2 Stats

TV76561198364446384[U:1:404180656]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

685Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,343Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.2 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,085 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,085 → 1,085
+1Tracked matches · now 685
0.0ppWin rate · 46.4% → 46.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 25 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,521 -832 27 Jan11 Feb · 9 days played
21,52122,753peak 22,75327 Jan11 Feb
Faceit ELO: 1,085 +0 1 Sept7 Sept · 3 observations
1,0851,085peak 1,0851 Sept7 Sept
23,001Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,085Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-01-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,085
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 116 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.0%43.8%44.8%3.8% short
Shot accuracy12.6%12.0%12.4%meets
Kill/death ratio0.831.021.040.20 short
Match win rate41.5%44.7%45.2%3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSyfførFACEITLevel 5 · 1,085 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,085csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim33
Positioning37
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48439Last 10048%Win rateWLLTTLLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.09 avg rating · +6.3pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 122 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 163 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Last 20

  • 6104 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim3.3
Utility4.7
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3
Positioning3.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.8

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time678ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 678ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+5.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · alpine, 26 Jan
60%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · inferno, 13 Mar
438msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · office, 25 Jan
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 27 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

alpineBest map · 83% over 18nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD1851328%-0.05
alpineS1815383%0.03
nukeD123925%-0.02
ancientA116555%-0.01
anubisD103730%-0.00
mirageA74357%0.02
dust2S65183%-0.02
overpass41325%-0.05
office31233%-0.01
italy32167%-0.02
vertigo2020%-0.01
warden220100%0.04
sanctum2020%-0.06
cache1010%-0.05
stronghold110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,683Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
3,293Matches
41.5%Match win rate
41.0%Headshot %
12.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
6,245MVPs
877Hours (in match)
2,422Bombs planted
554Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,389nuke
2,063inferno
1,897dust2
1,868vertigo
1,232lake
1,156office
516train
104safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

82Matches
55%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
89.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2065%1.2416.8
Nuke1553%1.0416.5
Dust21547%0.9715.3
Anubis978%1.2715.9
Inferno850%1.3417.4
Ancient850%1.2920.1
Overpass450%1.1215.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
29.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
67.6%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
661msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
6.94HE damage / grenade
10.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4491 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.7899% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–10-0.0524%7 Sept
vertigo4–9-0.0911%29 May
inferno6–9-0.1217%29 May
cache12–12-0.0519%29 May
nuke8–80.0129%13 Mar
inferno1–9-0.1260%13 Mar
inferno3–9-0.2325%13 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0822%4 Mar
overpass8–8-0.0819%12 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0318%11 Feb
vertigo9–130.0627%9 Feb
alpine13–70.0425%8 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0329%8 Feb
anubis6–130.0218%8 Feb
alpine10–13-0.0111%5 Feb
dust212–10.0510%5 Feb
anubis12–12-0.0417%5 Feb
anubis13–30.0114%5 Feb
mirage13–90.0617%5 Feb
alpine13–10-0.0412%4 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0040%4 Feb
ancient13–110.029%3 Feb
overpass7–13-0.049%3 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0123%3 Feb
office2–13-0.0744%3 Feb
alpine13–90.0616%3 Feb
alpine13–70.0113%3 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0224%3 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0214%2 Feb
inferno13–9-0.069%1 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0713%31 Jan
inferno11–130.039%31 Jan
inferno11–130.0915%30 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0120%30 Jan
nuke2–13-0.067%30 Jan
alpine13–100.0814%30 Jan
dust213–11-0.0712%30 Jan
inferno5–9-0.2211%30 Jan
nuke11–130.0110%30 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0013%30 Jan
warden13–30.0216%29 Jan
sanctum6–9-0.0811%29 Jan
nuke8–8-0.0229%29 Jan
alpine13–50.0811%29 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0511%29 Jan
alpine7–130.0315%29 Jan
alpine13–9-0.0625%29 Jan
ancient0–7-0.024%29 Jan
anubis13–100.018%29 Jan
warden13–30.0620%29 Jan
alpine13–90.0611%29 Jan
alpine13–60.064%28 Jan
alpine13–40.059%28 Jan
alpine13–100.0310%28 Jan
alpine6–30.0313%28 Jan
stronghold13–80.0813%28 Jan
alpine10–130.0115%28 Jan
alpine13–10-0.0112%28 Jan
inferno13–6-0.0113%28 Jan
anubis13–5-0.0111%28 Jan
italy11–13-0.0511%28 Jan
nuke13–60.0929%28 Jan
italy13–11-0.0413%27 Jan
nuke11–130.0215%27 Jan
dust27–13-0.1016%27 Jan
overpass13–11-0.006%27 Jan
ancient13–00.0811%27 Jan
mirage13–80.0819%27 Jan
nuke10–130.0216%27 Jan
inferno15–15-0.067%27 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0622%27 Jan
dust213–50.0320%27 Jan
inferno16–14-0.0213%27 Jan
ancient0–13-0.1113%27 Jan
inferno12–16-0.0518%27 Jan
alpine13–30.159%26 Jan
alpine13–10-0.0214%26 Jan
office13–70.1014%26 Jan
inferno12–120.0311%26 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0118%26 Jan
anubis8–130.0411%26 Jan
ancient13–2-0.0111%26 Jan
mirage11–130.0611%26 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0111%26 Jan
sanctum8–8-0.039%26 Jan
mirage13–2-0.0013%26 Jan
ancient13–60.0122%26 Jan
italy12–50.0220%25 Jan
office5–13-0.055%25 Jan
ancient13–16-0.038%25 Jan
dust213–90.0224%25 Jan
mirage1–13-0.1212%25 Jan
ancient13–40.0124%25 Jan
nuke5–13-0.080%25 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0621%25 Jan
inferno16–13-0.0114%25 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0512%25 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0518%25 Jan
anubis12–120.0219%25 Jan
mirage13–70.1022%25 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →