MrNavorski

MrNavorski — CS2 Stats

CX76561198360889691[U:1:400623963]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,167Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,519Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,489Purple band · top ~14.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,489 +4,787 23 Jul – 26 Sept · 24 days played
13,70219,324peak 19,32423 Jul26 Sept
19,882Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-07-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 835 below peak (19,324)
  • -483 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,511 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches39——
Win rate36%——
K/D1.08——
Headshot %42%——

Measured 8 Sep 2026 → 8 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.6%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy19.8%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.441.061.07above
Match win rate79.9%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMrNavorskiFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,489 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning53
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateWWWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time528ms−86ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 12 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · cache, 5 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 21 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W3Current streak
12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 48% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3119–1261%0.01
mirageB2110–1148%0.00
ancientA138–562%0.01
cacheS128–467%0.02
nukeB105–550%0.02
infernoA85–363%0.04
anubis—41–325%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 21). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

192,879Lifetime kills
1.44K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
17,907Matches
79.9%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 8 players
52.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
19.8%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
29,179MVPs
3,209Hours (in match)
9,937Bombs planted
1,716Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,753
AWP16,324
P25011,884
UMP-457,136
SSG 084,602

Lifetime map wins

26,502dust2
7,028nuke
5,245train
4,012vertigo
2,811inferno
676cbble
168safehouse
165lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,154Matches
49%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
86.5ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25048%1.3217.9
Mirage3234%1.0816.7
Ancient2564%1.1617.6
Inferno2152%1.1417.7
Anubis1450%0.9313.9
Cache1362%1.2917.2
Vertigo1145%1.2117.9
Nuke729%0.9517.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
531msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
47.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.20HE damage / grenade
3.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4739 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3799% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–20.1512%27 Sept →
dust213–110.0123%26 Sept →
cache16–140.0221%23 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0115%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0119%23 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0910%21 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0216%15 Sept →
ancient10–130.0723%14 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0317%7 Sept →
dust213–70.057%7 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0431%6 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0015%6 Sept →
mirage13–80.0214%3 Sept →
dust212–160.0115%3 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0123%31 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0116%30 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0115%30 Aug →
dust213–80.0612%30 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.057%30 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0112%30 Aug →
nuke16–130.0221%30 Aug →
nuke15–190.0211%29 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0117%29 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0133%29 Aug →
inferno10–130.0217%29 Aug →
ancient13–90.0916%29 Aug →
ancient16–12-0.0614%29 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0632%29 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.047%27 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0414%27 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0319%27 Aug →
ancient13–30.0622%25 Aug →
inferno13–100.0327%24 Aug →
dust28–130.0025%24 Aug →
mirage6–130.0424%24 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0217%23 Aug →
dust27–130.0116%21 Aug →
anubis13–110.0213%21 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0113%19 Aug →
dust213–30.0017%19 Aug →
ancient13–70.017%17 Aug →
inferno13–90.0117%17 Aug →
nuke13–40.1824%14 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0610%13 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0216%13 Aug →
dust213–100.0510%12 Aug →
ancient3–130.0729%12 Aug →
inferno13–20.1827%12 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0227%12 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.1111%11 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0120%11 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0113%11 Aug →
dust213–110.0516%11 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.058%11 Aug →
mirage13–60.0625%11 Aug →
cache13–70.0918%11 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0123%11 Aug →
cache13–40.0316%10 Aug →
ancient13–70.0815%10 Aug →
cache13–30.0826%10 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0220%10 Aug →
cache16–140.0226%10 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0215%10 Aug →
cache9–130.0427%9 Aug →
mirage13–80.0417%9 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0724%9 Aug →
dust25–13-0.059%9 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0510%7 Aug →
dust213–60.0917%7 Aug →
dust211–130.0224%6 Aug →
ancient13–90.0311%6 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.078%6 Aug →
mirage13–40.0410%6 Aug →
dust213–80.0513%5 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0117%5 Aug →
dust213–80.007%5 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0513%5 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0638%5 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0418%4 Aug →
anubis3–130.0414%4 Aug →
nuke13–110.0313%3 Aug →
nuke13–110.1022%3 Aug →
mirage11–130.0320%3 Aug →
mirage13–10.1224%3 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0023%1 Aug →
inferno15–150.0214%1 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0415%1 Aug →
cache13–90.0614%28 Jul →
inferno13–110.0711%28 Jul →
inferno13–80.0719%27 Jul →
dust216–120.0225%27 Jul →
cache7–30.0331%27 Jul →
nuke16–120.0319%27 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0117%27 Jul →
dust28–130.0013%27 Jul →
mirage10–130.088%27 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0014%27 Jul →
dust213–50.0819%26 Jul →
dust213–110.0923%23 Jul →
dust29–130.0420%21 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.