⋆❅*⋆☃아이유✨₊₊⁺☁

⋆❅*⋆☃아이유✨₊₊⁺☁ — CS2 Stats

HK76561198357197408[U:1:396931680]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

870Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
665Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,071 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 870 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 5 Apr 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,438 +1,283 5 Apr7 Jul · 26 days played
12,53315,438peak 15,4385 Apr7 Jul
15,497Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,071Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2025-04-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,071
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 130 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 14 Sep 2026 and 19 Sep 2026.

Measured 14 Sep 202619 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate36.5%43.8%44.8%8.3% short
Shot accuracy7.4%12.0%12.4%5.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.801.021.040.24 short
Match win rate46.3%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG⋆❅*⋆☃아이유✨₊₊⁺☁FACEITLevel 5 · 1,071 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,071csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning53
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateLWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility2.9
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.3
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time582ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 11–13 · nuke, 4 Oct
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–3 · inferno, 16 Apr
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 9 May
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 15 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
512In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 23nukeWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26141254%-0.03
infernoS2315865%-0.00
mirageB2091145%-0.01
ancientC125742%-0.03
nukeC114736%-0.01
anubis43175%0.04
cache21150%-0.05
train1010%-0.04
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,155Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
1,524Matches
46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
36.5%Headshot %
7.4%Shot accuracy
2,568MVPs
665Hours (in match)
1,371Bombs planted
253Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,721inferno
3,634dust2
1,666nuke
513vertigo
57train
7office
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

227Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
76.3ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5953%0.9814.1
Mirage4743%0.9414.6
Nuke3057%1.0917.6
Dust22759%1.1415.8
Anubis1844%1.1316.3
Ancient1747%0.9915.9
Vertigo128%0.7611.8
Overpass1275%0.9617.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
586msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
48.1%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
8.61HE damage / grenade
6.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.711% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0521%12 Jul
dust213–60.0532%12 Jul
cache13–9-0.0418%9 Jul
dust29–13-0.083%9 Jul
dust211–130.0026%23 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0122%21 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0230%21 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0111%20 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0611%3 Jun
dust28–13-0.019%9 May
mirage6–130.0425%27 Dec
ancient13–11-0.0119%7 Nov
nuke11–13-0.0019%7 Nov
nuke11–130.0820%4 Oct
mirage13–5-0.0111%17 Sept
train15–15-0.0411%14 Sept
nuke7–130.0217%14 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0515%7 Sept
mirage16–120.0222%5 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0014%29 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0137%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0017%22 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0013%22 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0722%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0713%15 Aug
dust213–9-0.057%12 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0318%12 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0317%5 Aug
inferno13–70.0313%29 Jul
ancient5–13-0.084%24 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0422%21 Jul
overpass1–13-0.0516%21 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0215%7 Jul
dust213–10-0.0317%7 Jul
dust213–8-0.0124%5 Jul
inferno13–10-0.029%3 Jul
dust213–6-0.0413%3 Jul
nuke13–90.0333%3 Jul
mirage15–15-0.048%3 Jul
ancient13–70.0110%3 Jul
mirage9–130.0016%21 Jun
dust22–130.043%10 Jun
anubis13–50.0310%8 Jun
nuke16–140.0215%8 Jun
dust29–13-0.0136%8 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0315%5 Jun
dust213–50.028%5 Jun
dust213–90.0016%5 Jun
dust213–6-0.0329%4 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0421%30 May
mirage0–2-0.120%27 May
dust22–13-0.1015%25 May
inferno13–70.0018%25 May
mirage13–90.075%25 May
mirage16–130.0321%25 May
anubis11–130.0614%24 May
inferno11–130.0312%24 May
dust213–7-0.019%15 May
dust213–30.0010%15 May
inferno13–10-0.0414%13 May
mirage9–130.0612%13 May
anubis13–100.0015%12 May
nuke10–13-0.0622%9 May
inferno13–70.0720%9 May
inferno10–13-0.0126%9 May
dust213–3-0.0613%9 May
ancient11–13-0.1316%9 May
ancient11–13-0.0018%9 May
nuke0–2-0.090%6 May
dust211–13-0.0110%6 May
inferno13–8-0.0121%30 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0011%30 Apr
dust29–13-0.0618%30 Apr
inferno13–50.0320%30 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0217%28 Apr
inferno8–130.0317%28 Apr
dust213–9-0.0222%27 Apr
mirage13–100.0323%27 Apr
inferno13–90.0321%27 Apr
dust26–13-0.0322%27 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0525%25 Apr
anubis13–80.0716%25 Apr
mirage13–40.0317%24 Apr
inferno13–10-0.026%24 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0120%24 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0516%24 Apr
dust210–13-0.0611%23 Apr
dust213–9-0.0213%23 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0214%23 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0516%23 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0412%23 Apr
dust23–11-0.0720%21 Apr
mirage6–13-0.079%21 Apr
ancient11–130.0413%21 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0025%20 Apr
inferno8–130.0224%20 Apr
inferno1–3-0.0550%16 Apr
dust26–13-0.1315%16 Apr
dust213–110.0214%5 Apr
inferno13–70.007%5 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →