IKURA?

IKURA? — CS2 Stats

76561198260662387[U:1:300396659]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,043Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,589 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,043 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 13 Apr 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,204 -28 13 Apr14 May · 24 days played
11,47213,660peak 13,66013 Apr14 May
13,770Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,589Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2025-04-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,589
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 162 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIKURA?FACEITLevel 8 · 1,589 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,589csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning53
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateLLWLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 671ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.0
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time647ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 18 Jul
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 29 Jul
477msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 9 May
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 28 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
511In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 54% over 28ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%0.01
infernoB23121152%0.03
dust2C1661038%0.01
nukeB137654%0.02
ancientC114736%-0.01
anubis440100%0.04
cache2020%-0.04
overpass21150%0.02
train1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

535Matches
50%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
85.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno12452%1.5019.2
Mirage10945%1.2117.4
Dust28449%1.1617.1
Nuke7254%1.5119.7
Anubis4854%1.3617.9
Ancient4245%1.2716.9
Overpass2277%2.1823.6
Train1250%1.1718.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
653msReaction time
27.4%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
7.33HE damage / grenade
8.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.3895% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–16-0.0528%5 Sept
dust23–13-0.0414%5 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0225%28 Aug
cache8–13-0.0318%28 Aug
mirage13–20.0213%28 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0019%21 Aug
dust21–13-0.115%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0320%21 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0120%19 Jul
nuke14–160.0024%19 Jul
inferno13–90.0014%19 Jul
inferno13–50.1719%18 Jul
dust213–70.0610%18 Jul
nuke10–130.0326%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0410%5 Jul
overpass11–130.0113%5 Jul
nuke13–70.0914%5 Jul
nuke13–90.0822%21 Jun
inferno13–110.0723%21 Jun
mirage12–160.0116%20 Jun
inferno5–130.0217%3 Jun
dust28–13-0.0515%9 May
ancient3–13-0.089%26 Apr
nuke11–13-0.107%4 Oct
mirage13–90.0413%12 Sept
mirage16–120.0416%5 Sept
ancient13–100.0410%29 Aug
mirage16–19-0.0212%17 Aug
mirage10–130.0426%15 Aug
inferno13–60.1515%13 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0135%29 Jul
overpass13–50.0418%18 Jul
anubis13–100.1013%10 Jul
mirage11–130.0116%21 Jun
dust24–130.0218%13 Jun
inferno4–130.0228%3 Jun
mirage5–130.0022%1 Jun
inferno13–100.0214%29 May
inferno13–70.0422%25 May
mirage7–13-0.0229%24 May
mirage13–10-0.0420%14 May
inferno13–10-0.0224%13 May
mirage9–130.0330%13 May
dust213–90.0718%10 May
mirage1–13-0.0715%10 May
nuke10–13-0.0112%9 May
inferno13–70.0524%9 May
inferno10–13-0.0311%9 May
inferno11–13-0.0120%8 May
mirage8–130.0621%8 May
mirage15–150.0916%7 May
nuke13–80.0614%7 May
anubis13–80.019%7 May
inferno16–120.0025%6 May
inferno10–130.0214%6 May
mirage13–11-0.049%5 May
dust210–13-0.0017%5 May
dust213–80.0014%5 May
ancient8–12-0.0020%30 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0314%30 Apr
ancient10–130.0315%29 Apr
anubis13–100.0719%29 Apr
mirage13–30.1317%29 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0224%28 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0131%28 Apr
train6–13-0.0316%28 Apr
mirage13–80.0516%28 Apr
nuke13–80.0321%26 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0113%26 Apr
dust213–50.1514%26 Apr
ancient8–13-0.019%26 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0118%26 Apr
inferno10–130.0519%26 Apr
dust210–130.0217%26 Apr
dust211–13-0.0226%26 Apr
inferno14–16-0.007%25 Apr
ancient15–150.0115%25 Apr
dust29–13-0.0621%25 Apr
inferno6–13-0.050%24 Apr
dust213–90.0712%23 Apr
inferno13–80.0917%23 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0125%23 Apr
ancient13–100.0728%23 Apr
nuke16–14-0.0019%22 Apr
dust211–130.0711%22 Apr
ancient11–13-0.028%21 Apr
mirage6–13-0.012%21 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0713%21 Apr
inferno8–130.0618%20 Apr
dust213–100.0118%18 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0611%17 Apr
anubis13–60.0015%16 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0313%16 Apr
mirage13–40.0715%16 Apr
nuke13–40.1031%15 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0227%15 Apr
inferno13–60.0715%14 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0316%13 Apr
mirage13–20.000%13 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0121%13 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →