tu4n t1ram1su

tu4n t1ram1su — CS2 Stats

76561198354843014[U:1:394577286]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,518Tracked matches43%Win rate2024Tracked since
898Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating24,060Top 25% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30519 of 251145 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 856 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,060 -940 28 Aug – 7 Oct · 8 days played
23,76125,000peak 25,00028 Aug7 Oct
25,000Peak Premier in tracked matches
856Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 856
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 45 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 940 below peak (25,000)
  • -662 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 940 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches146——
Win rate49%——
K/D1.02——
Headshot %47%——

Measured 9 Sep 2026 → 9 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,051), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate45.5%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy1.5%12.2%11.3%9.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.010.980.99meets
Match win rate46.5%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtu4n t1ram1suFACEITLevel 3 · 856 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER24,060 · Pink bandPEAK ELO856csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning48
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37–51–12Last 10037%Win rateWTWWWWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 5–13–2 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 45% on T to 28% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time564ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 7 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · cache, 15 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 26 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 22infernoWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2410–1442%0.00
mirageB2211–1150%0.01
infernoD185–1328%0.04
cacheC145–936%-0.00
anubisD72–529%0.01
ancientD72–529%-0.03
nuke—30–30%-0.02
vertigo—31–233%-0.02
rush_001—10–10%-0.10
overpass—11–0100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,265Lifetime kills
1.01K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
2,462Matches
46.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
45.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
1.5%Shot accuracy
4,460MVPs
898Hours (in match)
2,095Bombs planted
568Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,052
AWP2,849
SG 5532,284
AUG1,448
MP91,104

Lifetime map wins

7,003dust2
3,085inferno
1,438nuke
430vertigo
371train
33office
26cbble
25aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

91Matches
43%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
66.1ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3339%0.9412.0
Dust21958%0.7511.6
Ancient1173%0.8714.6
Nuke922%0.8013.2
Anubis729%0.9512.6
Inferno617%1.2017.0
Train30%0.9316.3
Vertigo250%0.8211.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
72.1%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
558msReaction time
45.5%T opening success
27.8%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
8.36HE damage / grenade
9.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 27.7684% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0619%9 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0418%7 Oct →
inferno13–40.1010%3 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0314%1 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0616%1 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0012%1 Oct →
inferno9–130.0423%30 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0011%30 Sept →
anubis12–120.0315%30 Sept →
inferno3–130.0933%30 Sept →
rush_0011–5-0.100%30 Sept →
inferno11–130.0416%29 Sept →
cache10–130.0211%28 Sept →
mirage5–130.0518%28 Sept →
mirage7–130.008%27 Sept →
inferno0–100.0114%27 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0617%27 Sept →
nuke4–130.0115%26 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0115%26 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0028%26 Sept →
cache6–130.0520%25 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0423%24 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0018%24 Sept →
vertigo11–13-0.0311%24 Sept →
cache13–70.1019%21 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0717%20 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0333%20 Sept →
cache13–90.0615%20 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0316%20 Sept →
cache13–40.0115%20 Sept →
cache0–7-0.1410%20 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0817%18 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0313%18 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.1038%17 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0224%17 Sept →
anubis10–130.0119%16 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0120%16 Sept →
anubis13–30.0414%16 Sept →
mirage11–130.0716%16 Sept →
mirage13–20.0422%16 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.069%15 Sept →
cache13–00.0140%15 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0221%15 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0211%14 Sept →
cache0–7-0.0920%14 Sept →
dust213–80.0418%14 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0514%14 Sept →
dust212–120.0427%14 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0519%14 Sept →
inferno12–120.0526%13 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0518%13 Sept →
dust26–130.0218%13 Sept →
inferno13–40.0622%11 Sept →
ancient10–130.0114%11 Sept →
dust210–130.049%11 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0028%10 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0114%10 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0210%10 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0012%10 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0515%8 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0616%8 Sept →
ancient10–130.0627%8 Sept →
anubis12–120.0414%8 Sept →
mirage13–60.0812%8 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0416%7 Sept →
mirage12–120.0018%7 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0216%7 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0410%7 Sept →
inferno13–20.1925%7 Sept →
dust212–120.0531%5 Sept →
dust211–130.0218%5 Sept →
dust212–120.0717%5 Sept →
dust213–70.0013%5 Sept →
mirage13–30.0222%5 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0220%5 Sept →
cache8–130.0513%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0623%4 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0514%4 Sept →
inferno12–120.1028%4 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0717%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.0113%2 Sept →
mirage11–130.0916%2 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0413%2 Sept →
inferno12–120.0419%31 Aug →
mirage13–40.0317%31 Aug →
inferno6–130.0427%31 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0218%31 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.105%30 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0615%30 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0121%30 Aug →
overpass13–10-0.0626%30 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0628%30 Aug →
dust29–20.0725%30 Aug →
dust213–20.0735%30 Aug →
mirage13–110.1113%30 Aug →
cache13–110.0322%30 Aug →
mirage2–130.0431%30 Aug →
inferno8–130.0322%29 Aug →
cache12–12-0.009%29 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0918%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.