Caado (Washed+Bad)

Caado (Washed+Bad) — CS2 Stats

TD76561198353654044[U:1:393388316]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,339Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,520Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,475Purple band · top ~14.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,161 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,475 -3,425 30 Aug – 29 Oct · 38 days played
18,43222,053peak 22,05330 Aug29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,161 +0 30 Aug – 14 Oct · 6 observations
1,1611,161peak 1,16130 Aug14 Oct
22,408Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,161Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,161
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 40 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,578 below peak (22,053)
  • -2,006 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,525 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches4882−34
Win rate46%48%−2pp
K/D3.894.14−0.25
Headshot %79%77%+2pp

Measured 29 Sep 2026 → 30 Oct 2026; previous 30 Aug 2026 → 29 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate58.5%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy7.3%12.7%13.0%5.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.371.051.06above
Match win rate45.3%45.7%46.3%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCaado (Washed+Bad)FACEITLevel 7 · 1,161 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,475 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,161csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning61
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateLWLWLLLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +36ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 698ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility4.8
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 47% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.1
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time613ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 11–13 · inferno, 3 Sept →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 5–8 · rush_001, 30 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 10 Sept →
11–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2111–1052%0.01
nukeC198–1142%-0.00
infernoC188–1044%0.03
ancientA127–558%0.01
mirageA117–464%-0.00
dust2D81–713%0.00
cacheD71–614%-0.02
vertigo—32–167%0.00
rush_001—10–10%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

213,631Lifetime kills
1.37K/D · Top 10% of Level 7 players
8,165Matches
45.3%Match win rate
58.5%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 7 players
7.3%Shot accuracy
17,053MVPs
3,557Hours (in match)
5,965Bombs planted
1,738Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47116,064
AWP13,105
FAMAS4,245
SG 5532,978
SSG 082,669

Lifetime map wins

12,276inferno
9,903nuke
8,246dust2
4,999vertigo
1,561office
1,092train
274italy
152cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

637Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
84.2ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10452%1.0817.5
Nuke10255%1.1717.2
Ancient9542%1.0716.3
Mirage7650%0.9615.3
Inferno7056%1.2417.8
Vertigo3757%1.1114.9
Dust23238%0.9013.4
Overpass862%1.1816.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
617msReaction time
63.4%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
4.47HE damage / grenade
7.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache2–13-0.1018%29 Oct →
inferno13–60.0816%29 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0114%28 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0118%27 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0621%27 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0816%26 Oct →
dust27–130.0013%22 Oct →
mirage13–60.0527%21 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0024%20 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0122%20 Oct →
inferno10–130.0421%20 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0120%20 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0625%19 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.049%15 Oct →
dust23–13-0.067%15 Oct →
mirage12–7-0.0715%14 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.048%14 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0114%12 Oct →
nuke13–40.0818%10 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0024%10 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0531%9 Oct →
dust28–130.0526%9 Oct →
inferno9–130.0419%9 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0116%7 Oct →
inferno9–130.018%6 Oct →
nuke13–50.0521%6 Oct →
ancient13–30.088%6 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0414%6 Oct →
mirage13–40.0318%5 Oct →
anubis13–110.0521%5 Oct →
inferno10–130.0411%2 Oct →
dust213–50.0522%2 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0116%1 Oct →
anubis13–70.0918%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0713%1 Oct →
rush_0015–8-0.1360%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.0015%30 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0126%28 Sept →
nuke13–40.0720%28 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.068%22 Sept →
ancient13–70.0710%22 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0412%18 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0318%18 Sept →
nuke11–130.0122%16 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.1019%16 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0613%16 Sept →
cache13–40.1018%15 Sept →
anubis11–130.0317%15 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0321%14 Sept →
inferno7–130.0517%14 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0112%14 Sept →
ancient7–10-0.0220%14 Sept →
inferno13–110.0429%14 Sept →
ancient13–100.0314%13 Sept →
inferno13–70.0432%13 Sept →
vertigo9–20.0417%11 Sept →
mirage5–130.0136%11 Sept →
dust27–130.0622%11 Sept →
mirage13–110.0533%10 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0317%10 Sept →
inferno13–70.0421%10 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0019%10 Sept →
nuke13–90.0318%10 Sept →
inferno16–130.0332%9 Sept →
inferno9–130.0623%9 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0722%9 Sept →
anubis13–90.0220%9 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0218%9 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0032%9 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0124%8 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0321%8 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0411%8 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0223%8 Sept →
nuke10–130.0024%8 Sept →
anubis13–160.0118%8 Sept →
ancient13–100.0416%7 Sept →
inferno13–100.0118%7 Sept →
anubis13–70.1122%7 Sept →
mirage11–00.0427%6 Sept →
anubis11–130.0417%4 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0426%4 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0315%3 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0228%3 Sept →
inferno11–130.1229%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0317%3 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0321%3 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0317%2 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0511%2 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0220%2 Sept →
dust27–130.0221%2 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0023%1 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0313%1 Sept →
nuke13–70.1214%1 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0338%31 Aug →
anubis13–80.0930%31 Aug →
inferno14–160.0212%31 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0215%28 Aug →
anubis31–27-0.0517%27 Aug →
anubis16–130.0220%27 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0518%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.