Kxtana かたな

Kxtana かたな — CS2 Stats

US76561198348729261[U:1:388463533]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,029Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,154Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,711Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31273 of 223060 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,029 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 3 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,711 +1,232 3 Mar17 Sept · 24 days played
22,47926,075peak 26,0753 Mar17 Sept
26,075Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-03-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,364 below peak (26,075)
  • -1,829 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,289 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=35,202), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate30.7%47.0%49.2%18.5% short
Shot accuracy20.6%13.0%13.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.341.081.12above
Match win rate45.3%46.7%48.5%3.2% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKxtana かたなPREMIER23,711 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning60
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateWWWTLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −43ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility3.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning6.0
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time558ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy34.0%+8.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 34.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 11–13 · dust2, 27 Jul
61%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · nuke, 28 Mar
375msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · office, 1 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 23 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 12nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%0.02
infernoB2091145%0.02
ancientC167944%-0.00
dust2S128467%0.05
anubisA106460%0.03
nukeD62433%0.02
cache220100%0.06
office21150%0.02
vertigo1010%-0.04
overpass110100%0.12
stronghold110100%-0.03
alpine110100%0.06
warden110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

173,174Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 25% of Pink band
5,268Matches
45.3%Match win rate
30.7%Headshot %
20.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Pink band
22,476MVPs
2,154Hours (in match)
1,625Bombs planted
1,667Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP100,271
AK-4727,013
Knife6,305
SSG 084,078

Lifetime map wins

3,877inferno
3,434dust2
2,538nuke
2,189vertigo
1,517train
468office
452lake
272safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

214Matches
60%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
93.1ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4360%1.3718.5
Inferno1872%1.5920.2
Vertigo1182%1.5420.6
Dust21173%1.6721.1
Nuke1050%1.3018.2
Ancient956%1.4422.2
Anubis743%1.3219.3
Overpass475%1.0416.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.8%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
547msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
6.69HE damage / grenade
2.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.0236 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1952% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.0838%2 Sept
cache13–50.0243%2 Sept
office13–80.0252%1 Sept
vertigo12–12-0.0421%1 Sept
mirage6–130.0028%25 Aug
ancient10–130.0320%25 Aug
ancient13–80.0437%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0139%24 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0138%22 Aug
inferno13–20.1044%21 Aug
ancient15–150.0428%17 Aug
mirage13–50.0533%7 Aug
inferno13–90.0120%2 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0517%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0433%1 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0037%1 Aug
anubis13–110.0548%1 Aug
mirage13–60.1150%1 Aug
mirage13–60.0536%28 Jul
dust24–13-0.0148%28 Jul
cache13–70.1022%28 Jul
dust211–130.1633%27 Jul
dust213–30.1031%26 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0137%26 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0832%26 Jul
inferno11–130.0432%25 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0125%24 Jul
mirage10–130.0340%24 Jul
inferno13–60.0428%24 Jul
mirage13–30.0733%24 Jul
dust213–40.0732%24 Jul
mirage10–130.0037%30 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0331%30 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0028%29 Jun
mirage13–100.0824%18 Jun
inferno10–130.0744%6 Jun
anubis16–120.0527%20 Apr
ancient3–7-0.0843%19 Apr
ancient13–20.0423%19 Apr
mirage13–20.0628%19 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0322%4 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0219%4 Apr
inferno13–90.0144%1 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0436%1 Apr
inferno15–150.0537%31 Mar
mirage13–3-0.0715%31 Mar
inferno13–60.0331%31 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0232%30 Mar
inferno13–110.0132%29 Mar
anubis13–20.0524%29 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0332%29 Mar
inferno10–130.0131%29 Mar
dust213–80.0834%29 Mar
ancient13–110.0223%29 Mar
overpass13–90.1225%29 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0725%29 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0428%29 Mar
inferno0–13-0.0917%28 Mar
anubis13–50.1026%28 Mar
nuke13–20.1161%28 Mar
mirage13–40.0139%25 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0531%25 Mar
stronghold1–2-0.0338%23 Mar
alpine13–30.0639%23 Mar
warden13–60.0126%23 Mar
mirage13–10.0933%23 Mar
dust27–13-0.0439%22 Mar
mirage10–130.0428%22 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0122%22 Mar
inferno12–120.1128%22 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0110%19 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0519%19 Mar
mirage7–10.0825%19 Mar
inferno9–130.0226%16 Mar
nuke14–160.0229%16 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0214%15 Mar
mirage13–110.0027%15 Mar
nuke9–130.0219%15 Mar
anubis13–50.1327%14 Mar
ancient13–60.0142%12 Mar
inferno13–110.0121%12 Mar
mirage13–30.0229%12 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0820%12 Mar
dust213–2-0.0040%10 Mar
anubis4–130.0323%10 Mar
dust28–13-0.0528%10 Mar
ancient2–130.0515%10 Mar
office8–130.0360%9 Mar
inferno13–50.0536%9 Mar
nuke13–70.0619%9 Mar
dust213–40.1143%8 Mar
dust216–140.0122%8 Mar
mirage13–110.0525%5 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0222%5 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0115%5 Mar
ancient13–60.0212%5 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0328%5 Mar
inferno8–130.0724%3 Mar
dust213–70.0918%3 Mar
ancient13–80.0826%3 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →