kid named thumb

kid named thumb — CS2 Stats

76561198347837603[U:1:387571875]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,565Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,174Hours in CS46Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,421Blue band · top ~42.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 913 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,421 +515 13 Sept – 11 Oct · 16 days played
11,90613,171peak 13,17113 Sept11 Oct
13,171Peak Premier in tracked matches
913Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-09-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 913
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-27
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 750 below peak (13,171)
  • +515 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,579 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-27
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-27

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches146——
Win rate50%——
K/D1.14——
Headshot %52%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 12 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate50.6%43.7%44.8%above
Shot accuracy5.2%12.0%12.4%7.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.021.030.13 short
Match win rate37.6%44.7%45.2%7.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkid named thumbFACEITLevel 5 · 913 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,421 · Blue bandPEAK ELO913csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning57
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–37–7Last 10056%Win rateLLLWLWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility3.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.7
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time634ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 14 Sept →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · ancient, 25 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · nuke, 27 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 18mirageWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113–862%0.01
ancientS1812–667%0.04
mirageC177–1041%0.01
anubisA159–660%0.03
nukeC146–843%0.00
dust2A106–460%-0.00
cache—21–150%0.01
vertigo—10–10%0.07
italy—11–0100%-0.04
train—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

49,054Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
2,745Matches
37.6%Match win rate
50.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
5.2%Shot accuracy
5,133MVPs
1,180Hours (in match)
2,359Bombs planted
501Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,047inferno
3,010nuke
2,301dust2
957vertigo
456train
176office
32italy
23lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

154Matches
47%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
81.0ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4538%1.0116.4
Ancient2759%1.3420.3
Inferno2250%1.1517.8
Dust22259%0.9912.6
Nuke2250%1.2116.1
Anubis825%0.8613.4
Overpass425%0.7912.3
Train250%1.1618.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
636msReaction time
22.9%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.28Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
5.97HE damage / grenade
3.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2775 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.9268% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0515%11 Oct →
mirage9–130.0126%11 Oct →
ancient10–130.0119%9 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0327%9 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0720%8 Oct →
ancient13–60.0425%8 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0032%8 Oct →
inferno13–90.0318%8 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0318%7 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0324%7 Oct →
ancient13–50.1223%7 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0423%7 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0630%7 Oct →
dust213–90.0122%6 Oct →
nuke13–40.0115%6 Oct →
mirage13–70.0723%6 Oct →
ancient11–130.0520%5 Oct →
ancient10–30.0622%5 Oct →
cache13–60.0022%4 Oct →
mirage9–130.0420%4 Oct →
anubis16–140.0416%4 Oct →
inferno13–110.0212%3 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0021%3 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.058%3 Oct →
ancient13–50.1119%3 Oct →
nuke13–40.0715%2 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0715%2 Oct →
ancient13–10.1215%2 Oct →
ancient12–120.0013%1 Oct →
mirage5–130.0532%30 Sept →
inferno13–30.0925%30 Sept →
ancient13–60.0625%30 Sept →
inferno13–70.0212%30 Sept →
nuke13–100.0120%29 Sept →
inferno13–80.0914%29 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0226%27 Sept →
mirage11–20.0221%27 Sept →
anubis13–90.0418%27 Sept →
anubis13–110.0425%26 Sept →
mirage13–30.0521%26 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.076%25 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0437%25 Sept →
anubis15–150.038%25 Sept →
inferno13–90.0321%24 Sept →
italy13–8-0.048%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0510%23 Sept →
nuke9–130.0415%23 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0321%23 Sept →
anubis9–130.0718%23 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0029%23 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0518%23 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0423%23 Sept →
cache7–70.0211%22 Sept →
train13–40.0717%22 Sept →
anubis13–40.0614%22 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0617%22 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0323%22 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0617%22 Sept →
inferno10–130.0523%21 Sept →
ancient13–90.0519%20 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.069%20 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0621%20 Sept →
anubis13–40.0816%20 Sept →
nuke13–110.0626%20 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0212%19 Sept →
dust213–100.0420%19 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0511%19 Sept →
inferno19–170.0322%18 Sept →
anubis13–50.0726%18 Sept →
nuke16–120.0330%18 Sept →
mirage13–100.0422%18 Sept →
anubis13–40.0216%18 Sept →
mirage11–130.0621%17 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0110%17 Sept →
inferno16–140.0420%17 Sept →
anubis13–70.0826%17 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.029%17 Sept →
mirage13–40.1131%16 Sept →
ancient13–40.0914%16 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0310%16 Sept →
anubis7–130.0122%16 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0121%16 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0128%16 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0413%16 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0219%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.0217%15 Sept →
inferno11–130.0123%15 Sept →
inferno13–80.0721%15 Sept →
inferno10–130.0525%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.0114%14 Sept →
ancient13–50.0525%14 Sept →
mirage14–160.0210%14 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.1813%14 Sept →
dust213–30.1520%14 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0213%14 Sept →
nuke10–130.0921%13 Sept →
ancient13–80.0725%13 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0218%13 Sept →
dust213–110.0116%13 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0120%13 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.