FoxyMarty — CS2 Stats

76561198347814096[U:1:387548368]✓ No bans

1,609Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since

4,573Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,746Purple band · top ~25.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8790 of 14012 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

15,746Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 15,746
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,254 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning48

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–52–5Last 10043%Win rateLWLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.2

Aggression7.5

Utility3.1

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning4.8

Utility3.1

Mechanics4.0

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.04

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time544ms−48ms

first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms

Headshot accuracy21.3%−3.5%

first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 12–12

13–1Biggest win — fachwerk

5Longest win streak

10–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	16	8–8	50%	0.02
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
anubis	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.00
inferno	D	11	2–9	18%	0.02
mirage	D	10	3–7	30%	0.02
nuke	D	9	3–6	33%	0.02
cache	S	9	6–3	67%	0.01
vertigo	C	7	3–4	43%	0.04
poseidon	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.08
shelter	—	2	2–0	100%	0.09
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,030Lifetime kills

1.05K/D

3,348Matches

45.6%Match win rate

34.3%Headshot %

9.2%Shot accuracy

7,631MVPs

1,233Hours (in match)

3,477Bombs planted

857Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP15,639

AK-478,487

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,084

SSG 085,403

Desert Eagle3,244

P2000 / USP-S2,624

Glock-182,085

SG 5531,083

Galil AR1,050

UMP-45957

Lifetime map wins

5,941dust2

4,758inferno

3,635nuke

1,253vertigo

1,019train

442office

92lake

80aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

102Matches

54%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

82.0ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	28	43%	0.92	13.8
Anubis	17	65%	1.09	16.1
Inferno	16	44%	1.05	13.9
Dust2	14	50%	1.21	17.2
Ancient	13	62%	1.42	18.4
Nuke	11	64%	1.42	20.2
Train	3	100%	1.33	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy

43.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

49.7%Spray accuracy

68.1%Counter-strafing

6.2°Preaim

536msReaction time

39.1%T opening success

40.4%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

4.8%Flash assists

6.92HE damage / grenade

2.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.48 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.1021% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	10–13	0.02	22%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	3%	24 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	20%	24 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	16%	24 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.05	16%	24 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.03	16%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	13%	24 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	22%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.10	39%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	32%	23 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	12%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	33%	23 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	38%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.17	25%	22 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.04	15%	22 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.10	18%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.05	22%	22 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.00	7%	22 Aug →
fachwerk	13–1	0.06	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	33%	21 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	24%	20 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	17%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	24%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	15%	20 Aug →
dust2	7–0	0.06	45%	20 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.03	25%	20 Aug →
train	12–12	0.00	17%	18 Aug →
overpass	2–13	-0.03	24%	18 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	8%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.19	22%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.01	11%	9 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.03	14%	8 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.06	33%	8 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	8%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.01	21%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.02	33%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	25%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.06	21%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.14	28%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.08	22%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.07	13%	5 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.04	21%	4 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	14%	4 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	17%	4 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.03	11%	4 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.01	29%	4 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	18%	3 Aug →
ancient	0–4	-0.05	30%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–2	-0.01	28%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.12	11%	3 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.01	10%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	28%	3 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	9%	1 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.02	23%	1 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.10	5%	31 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.01	15%	31 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.20	23%	31 Jul →
poseidon	4–9	-0.11	36%	31 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.02	28%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.08	31%	30 Jul →
poseidon	9–6	-0.12	18%	29 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.03	21%	29 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	0.02	29%	29 Jul →
inferno	1–8	-0.01	50%	29 Jul →
shelter	13–7	0.12	10%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.00	26%	27 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.09	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	18%	25 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	23%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	14%	25 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	0.04	20%	23 Jul →
poseidon	3–9	-0.12	44%	23 Jul →
poseidon	0–9	-0.23	40%	21 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	21%	21 Jul →
shelter	13–2	0.07	45%	21 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.05	41%	21 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	-0.08	31%	20 Jul →
inferno	12–12	-0.04	23%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.04	32%	20 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	33%	18 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.06	25%	18 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	-0.03	25%	16 Jul →
vertigo	9–6	0.19	19%	16 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.10	0%	16 Jul →
poseidon	9–2	-0.01	29%	15 Jul →
debris	6–9	-0.01	10%	15 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	23%	15 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.01	14%	15 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	21%	14 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	21%	14 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.04	35%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.07	30%	14 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.00	21%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	13%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	33%	13 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.03	30%	13 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	11%	13 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	24%	13 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.16	27%	13 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	21%	13 Jul →