Plin Plin Plon

Plin Plin Plon — CS2 Stats

WF76561198344810888[U:1:384545160]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

971Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
596Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,745 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 971 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,653 -121 25 Feb – 12 Jun · 7 days played
23,16124,467peak 24,46725 Feb12 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,745 +0 5 Sept – 2 Nov · 3 observations
1,7451,745peak 1,7455 Sept2 Nov
24,585Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,745Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-02-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,745
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 6 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.8%48.2%50.9%2.2% short
Shot accuracy9.8%13.2%13.7%3.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.071.09above
Match win rate47.7%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPlin Plin PlonFACEITLevel 9 · 1,745 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,745csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning59
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–35–8Last 10057%Win rateLLWWWWWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +45ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.9
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time597ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 25 Feb →
83%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 2 Apr →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · inferno, 9 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 9 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2414–1058%0.02
nukeS139–469%0.01
infernoB137–654%0.04
dust2A95–456%0.02
anubisA85–363%0.02
overpassA74–357%0.01
ancientD62–433%-0.01
officeB63–350%0.04
cacheA53–260%0.01
vertigoA53–260%0.01
train—42–250%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,573Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
1,992Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
48.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
9.8%Shot accuracy
5,360MVPs
596Hours (in match)
1,821Bombs planted
347Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,192inferno
1,496nuke
1,474dust2
1,332office
1,007train
914vertigo
378lake
171cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

80Matches
66%Win rate
1.43Avg K/D
93.3ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3367%1.3817.5
Nuke1267%1.4819.1
Ancient978%1.3319.3
Inferno944%1.3820.7
Anubis862%1.4822.1
Dust2683%1.5125.0
Train2100%2.2725.0
Vertigo10%1.0716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
591msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
7.68HE damage / grenade
4.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7567% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke0–6-0.0550%29 Aug →
cache7–130.0520%9 Aug →
inferno13–00.0017%9 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0220%25 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0415%25 Jul →
dust213–30.0432%19 Jul →
ancient13–70.0924%11 Jul →
cache2–2-0.010%11 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0119%5 Jul →
inferno12–120.1215%3 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0418%2 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0218%2 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0116%29 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0314%12 Jun →
dust213–80.0016%12 Jun →
mirage13–60.0219%12 Jun →
inferno9–130.0721%10 Jun →
nuke13–20.0015%10 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0116%10 Jun →
dust25–130.0529%10 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0814%10 Jun →
cache13–10-0.0023%8 Jun →
mirage13–90.0619%8 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0321%8 Jun →
inferno12–120.0925%8 Jun →
cache13–70.0424%8 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0117%24 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0630%24 Apr →
train2–130.0225%24 Apr →
dust211–130.0429%23 Apr →
nuke3–13-0.0783%2 Apr →
ancient10–130.0148%17 Mar →
mirage13–60.1222%16 Mar →
anubis8–130.0827%15 Mar →
anubis1–6-0.120%14 Mar →
nuke14–160.0023%13 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0421%13 Mar →
mirage16–13-0.0712%12 Mar →
mirage12–12-0.0215%10 Mar →
office9–13-0.0026%9 Mar →
overpass13–40.0016%9 Mar →
vertigo13–110.0314%8 Mar →
office13–3-0.0025%6 Mar →
nuke13–70.0324%6 Mar →
overpass13–70.1038%4 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0415%4 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0713%4 Mar →
ancient10–130.0218%3 Mar →
nuke13–3-0.087%3 Mar →
anubis13–70.0223%3 Mar →
train13–30.0425%3 Mar →
anubis13–40.0224%2 Mar →
mirage13–80.1019%2 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0216%2 Mar →
overpass13–7-0.0114%1 Mar →
train13–40.0922%27 Feb →
dust213–90.0520%27 Feb →
inferno13–8-0.0127%25 Feb →
nuke5–00.1456%25 Feb →
dust27–130.0736%25 Feb →
vertigo13–30.0544%25 Feb →
anubis15–150.0924%25 Feb →
nuke13–40.1925%25 Feb →
inferno13–110.0326%25 Feb →
overpass7–130.0020%24 Feb →
mirage13–60.0635%24 Feb →
office13–40.0623%24 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0129%23 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0520%23 Feb →
mirage7–130.0424%23 Feb →
nuke13–50.0517%23 Feb →
anubis13–100.1333%23 Feb →
overpass13–8-0.0121%23 Feb →
mirage13–80.0922%23 Feb →
inferno13–60.1323%23 Feb →
mirage13–100.0321%22 Feb →
mirage19–15-0.0226%22 Feb →
mirage13–70.0512%22 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0215%21 Feb →
mirage13–40.0619%21 Feb →
inferno11–130.0024%18 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0114%17 Feb →
inferno13–100.0435%17 Feb →
office7–130.0223%17 Feb →
mirage8–130.0627%17 Feb →
inferno13–100.0628%17 Feb →
dust213–4-0.0122%17 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0119%17 Feb →
nuke13–100.0130%17 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0229%16 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0232%16 Feb →
vertigo9–130.0627%16 Feb →
office13–60.1038%16 Feb →
inferno8–80.0920%15 Feb →
vertigo3–9-0.145%15 Feb →
mirage6–130.0142%15 Feb →
overpass9–13-0.0226%15 Feb →
office12–120.0928%15 Feb →
train6–130.0129%14 Feb →
vertigo13–80.0520%14 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.