BlackTafel

BlackTafel — CS2 Stats

DE76561198343992085[U:1:383726357]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,587Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,873Hours in CS69Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,112Top 10% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20238 of 259059 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,112 +2,630 31 Aug – 30 Oct · 22 days played
19,89025,112peak 25,11231 Aug30 Oct
25,112Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,112
  • +4,134 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,888 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,318), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate39.1%49.3%50.9%11.8% short
Shot accuracy12.4%13.4%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.121.180.17 short
Match win rate44.7%48.5%51.9%7.2% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBlackTafelPREMIER25,112 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning61
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–44–6Last 10050%Win rateWWTLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 13–5–2 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time539ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 28 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 25 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · cache, 20 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 15cacheWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B179–853%0.01
mirageS1511–473%0.01
infernoC156–940%0.01
cacheC145–936%-0.01
ancientB136–746%-0.02
nukeC125–742%0.02
anubisA117–464%0.02
rush_001—10–10%-0.08
fachwerk—10–10%-0.06
eldorado—11–0100%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

82,457Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
4,916Matches
44.7%Match win rate
39.1%Headshot %
12.4%Shot accuracy
13,214MVPs
1,889Hours (in match)
8,907Bombs planted
2,354Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,445
AWP9,947
MP92,356
MAC-101,585
SSG 081,569

Lifetime map wins

9,767dust2
8,605inferno
3,121nuke
1,434vertigo
1,145train
649cbble
305office
96assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

334Matches
53%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
84.2ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23450%1.2617.1
Mirage2959%1.2716.2
Anubis2070%1.1716.0
Inferno1861%1.3015.7
Ancient1338%1.0815.9
Nuke667%1.5721.5
Cache540%1.1115.4
Overpass250%0.8814.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
538msReaction time
60.3%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
9.27HE damage / grenade
8.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4939 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10.0823%30 Oct →
cache13–60.0214%30 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0313%30 Oct →
anubis10–130.0318%30 Oct →
inferno8–130.0117%28 Oct →
dust213–90.0327%28 Oct →
inferno13–70.0714%28 Oct →
mirage13–70.0623%28 Oct →
cache13–80.1015%28 Oct →
dust213–20.1126%28 Oct →
mirage13–70.0117%28 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0218%28 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0213%28 Oct →
dust213–80.0215%28 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0510%28 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0618%27 Oct →
cache13–110.0114%27 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0023%27 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.1019%27 Oct →
anubis15–150.0714%26 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0511%26 Oct →
ancient12–160.0020%26 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.0112%26 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0219%26 Oct →
inferno13–70.018%25 Oct →
dust213–60.0021%25 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0140%25 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0213%25 Oct →
nuke11–130.0819%25 Oct →
inferno9–130.0315%25 Oct →
rush_0016–8-0.0827%19 Oct →
dust213–70.0614%19 Oct →
ancient13–60.0116%19 Oct →
nuke13–90.0326%13 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0121%13 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0118%13 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0415%13 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0122%13 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0117%13 Oct →
nuke13–70.0734%13 Oct →
anubis13–110.1115%13 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0016%12 Oct →
nuke10–130.0324%12 Oct →
nuke13–110.0725%12 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0512%11 Oct →
dust213–40.0526%11 Oct →
dust28–130.0015%11 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0720%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0213%2 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0214%2 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0321%2 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0214%2 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0213%1 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0210%1 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0216%1 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0516%1 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0121%1 Oct →
dust25–130.0422%1 Oct →
ancient13–110.019%1 Oct →
mirage13–30.0217%1 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0020%30 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0120%30 Sept →
inferno6–130.0330%30 Sept →
inferno11–130.077%30 Sept →
inferno13–160.0522%30 Sept →
anubis13–50.1119%30 Sept →
dust213–00.0829%30 Sept →
mirage13–90.038%30 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0227%30 Sept →
nuke13–60.037%28 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0310%28 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0822%24 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0814%23 Sept →
inferno13–50.0013%23 Sept →
mirage13–60.0729%23 Sept →
inferno13–90.0011%22 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0312%22 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0715%22 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0626%21 Sept →
cache13–110.018%20 Sept →
inferno13–80.0514%20 Sept →
cache7–130.0212%20 Sept →
ancient13–80.0413%20 Sept →
anubis13–90.0419%20 Sept →
anubis6–60.0212%20 Sept →
nuke6–130.0121%20 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0629%20 Sept →
fachwerk3–13-0.0614%20 Sept →
cache9–13-0.059%20 Sept →
eldorado9–2-0.1025%15 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0420%15 Sept →
anubis7–130.0334%15 Sept →
ancient10–130.0714%15 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0020%15 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0323%15 Sept →
mirage6–130.0923%15 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0126%15 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0222%14 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0527%14 Sept →
mirage8–130.0420%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.