Rem — CS2 Stats
76561198341015690[U:1:380749962]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 1,000
- 0 over 30 days · steady
- Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 51 to go
- Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
- Level 4 first seen 2026-08-29
- Level 3 first seen 2026-08-29
Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction
Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 4–1 · 80% win rate
- Avg rating 0.11
- Avg headshot accuracy 20%
- Avg reaction 584ms
Last 10
- 7–3 · 70% win rate
- Avg rating 0.05
- Avg headshot accuracy 25%
- Avg reaction 620ms
Last 20
- 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
- Avg rating 0.05
- Avg headshot accuracy 27%
- Avg reaction 638ms
Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).
Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 13.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 nuke | D | 83 | 27–56 | 33% | 0.03 |
 vertigo | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | 0.07 |
| office | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.09 |
 cache | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | -0.02 |
 dust2 | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.04 |
 train | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.06 |
 mirage | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.03 |
 anubis | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.09 |
 ancient | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.08 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 83). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 1 | 100% | 1.30 | 13.0 |
| Ancient | 1 | 100% | 1.69 | 22.0 |
| Nuke | 1 | 100% | 1.27 | 14.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced MechanicsAim Training →
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 13.7885° — above the 12° mark we flag
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3599 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 83 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.10 | 19% | 5 Nov → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.10 | 14% | 5 Nov → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.08 | 13% | 5 Nov → | |
| office | 4–13 | 0.10 | 22% | 5 Nov → | |
| nuke | 8–5 | 0.15 | 33% | 5 Nov → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.05 | 50% | 5 Nov → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.04 | 18% | 5 Nov → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.01 | 25% | 5 Nov → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.10 | 16% | 4 Nov → | |
| nuke | 4–4 | -0.04 | 36% | 4 Nov → | |
| nuke | 2–13 | 0.01 | 15% | 4 Nov → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.09 | 32% | 4 Nov → | |
| nuke | 2–13 | -0.03 | 46% | 4 Nov → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.07 | 24% | 4 Nov → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.02 | 36% | 4 Nov → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.14 | 27% | 4 Nov → | |
| nuke | 7–7 | 0.10 | 20% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | 0.00 | 19% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.06 | 40% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | -0.03 | 34% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | -0.01 | 35% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.06 | 21% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | 0.07 | 16% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.03 | 45% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.02 | 55% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | 0.10 | 25% | 2 Nov → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.14 | 28% | 30 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 8–0 | 0.28 | 56% | 30 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.00 | 42% | 30 Oct → | |
| nuke | 4–0 | 0.08 | 0% | 30 Oct → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.04 | 36% | 30 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.11 | 26% | 29 Oct → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.06 | 18% | 29 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.08 | 30% | 29 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.12 | 35% | 29 Oct → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.02 | 21% | 29 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.23 | 35% | 29 Oct → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.08 | 45% | 29 Oct → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | 0.04 | 38% | 29 Oct → | |
| cache | 13–7 | -0.04 | 25% | 27 Oct → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | 0.10 | 30% | 20 Oct → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | 0.04 | 32% | 20 Oct → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.11 | 27% | 20 Oct → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | -0.03 | 36% | 20 Oct → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | 0.10 | 31% | 20 Oct → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | -0.01 | 45% | 20 Oct → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | 0.08 | 22% | 17 Oct → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.11 | 27% | 15 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | -0.04 | 26% | 15 Oct → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | 0.03 | 42% | 15 Oct → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.04 | 22% | 15 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | -0.00 | 39% | 15 Oct → | |
| nuke | 4–7 | 0.04 | 60% | 15 Oct → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.00 | 54% | 15 Oct → | |
| train | 13–7 | 0.02 | 30% | 15 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.10 | 18% | 15 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 1–8 | -0.04 | 13% | 15 Oct → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.02 | 33% | 12 Oct → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.04 | 22% | 12 Oct → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 12 Oct → | |
| cache | 13–9 | -0.00 | 15% | 12 Oct → | |
| office | 5–13 | 0.08 | 33% | 12 Oct → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | -0.00 | 25% | 12 Oct → | |
| train | 13–2 | 0.10 | 30% | 12 Oct → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.05 | 38% | 7 Oct → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.09 | 19% | 7 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.03 | 31% | 7 Oct → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.05 | 24% | 7 Oct → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.09 | 15% | 7 Oct → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.03 | 26% | 7 Oct → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.06 | 54% | 7 Oct → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | 0.17 | 37% | 3 Oct → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.02 | 25% | 3 Oct → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | 0.04 | 29% | 3 Oct → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.01 | 33% | 3 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.08 | 37% | 3 Oct → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.04 | 23% | 30 Sept → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | 0.03 | 53% | 30 Sept → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.01 | 37% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 8–5 | -0.06 | 20% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.00 | 36% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | -0.05 | 40% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.05 | 34% | 23 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 13–8 | 0.06 | 26% | 23 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.03 | 21% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.04 | 18% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 4–4 | 0.01 | 50% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | -0.02 | 33% | 23 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 6–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | -0.00 | 25% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 21 Sept → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.04 | 36% | 21 Sept → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.06 | 32% | 21 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–9 | 0.09 | 22% | 21 Sept → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.00 | 43% | 21 Sept → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.02 | 28% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 10–1 | 0.03 | 26% | 20 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–6 | 0.08 | 29% | 20 Sept → | |
| vertigo | 13–4 | 0.12 | 24% | 20 Sept → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | 0.12 | 45% | 20 Sept → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
Milestones
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.