zek

zek — CS2 Stats

SE76561198339292623[U:1:379026895]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

890Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,908Hours in CS63Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating8.4 StrongOpening Duellist
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,010 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (52 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,010 → 2,010
+175Tracked matches · now 890
+13.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,010 +0 6 Sept – 10 Sept · 2 observations
2,0102,010peak 2,0106 Sept10 Sept
2,010Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-09-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,010
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 490 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate49.2%48.2%50.9%1.8% short
Shot accuracy11.2%13.2%13.7%2.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.051.071.090.04 short
Match win rate49.8%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzekFACEITLevel 9 · 2,010 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,010csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning88
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–44Last 10056%Win rateWWWLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · +102ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+2.1 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim9.0
Utility7.7
Positioning8.8
Opening Duels9.4
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contributionStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 77% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning8.8
Utility7.7
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels9.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 8.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time531ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy25.2%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 26 Oct →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 30 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 11 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 26 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
18–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 27infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2717–1063%0.02
dust2B2413–1154%0.03
ancientB179–853%0.04
anubisA169–756%0.05
infernoC52–340%0.05
nukeA53–260%-0.00
cache—41–325%-0.05
overpass—22–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

155,824Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
5,708Matches
49.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
49.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
11.2%Shot accuracy
15,991MVPs
3,026Hours (in match)
5,603Bombs planted
2,252Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4753,063
AWP30,851
P2503,925
MP92,990
Knife2,748

Lifetime map wins

10,349dust2
8,965inferno
2,111train
2,062nuke
1,730vertigo
1,096cbble
85safehouse
63italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

402Matches
54%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
79.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28361%1.2615.7
Mirage7853%1.2616.4
Anubis5652%1.1916.1
Ancient5252%1.1215.1
Inferno3749%1.1215.7
Nuke1741%1.4515.7
Train6100%1.2017.3
Vertigo540%0.8213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
522msReaction time
66.6%T opening success
77.4%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
10.09HE damage / grenade
20.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–9-0.0422%1 Nov →
ancient13–110.0218%31 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0227%31 Oct →
inferno10–130.0616%31 Oct →
dust23–130.0139%31 Oct →
ancient13–110.0821%31 Oct →
overpass13–50.0116%31 Oct →
dust25–130.0024%30 Oct →
mirage13–110.1121%30 Oct →
dust213–70.0947%30 Oct →
mirage6–130.0633%30 Oct →
dust213–50.0536%30 Oct →
anubis13–160.0617%29 Oct →
inferno13–100.059%28 Oct →
ancient13–90.1033%28 Oct →
mirage13–60.2132%28 Oct →
anubis11–130.1121%27 Oct →
inferno8–130.0127%27 Oct →
ancient13–110.0832%26 Oct →
mirage13–60.0643%26 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0217%26 Oct →
anubis13–110.0735%26 Oct →
dust213–20.2319%26 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0119%26 Oct →
mirage16–190.0426%24 Oct →
anubis9–130.0925%24 Oct →
mirage7–130.0426%24 Oct →
anubis9–130.1019%24 Oct →
ancient13–50.1326%24 Oct →
dust213–90.0132%24 Oct →
anubis13–90.0014%24 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0122%24 Oct →
dust24–12-0.0518%24 Oct →
dust217–190.0926%23 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0123%23 Oct →
inferno14–160.0533%22 Oct →
anubis11–130.0418%20 Oct →
ancient16–190.0621%19 Oct →
dust28–130.0237%17 Oct →
ancient11–130.0517%14 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0731%14 Oct →
inferno13–100.0825%11 Oct →
anubis19–170.0522%11 Oct →
mirage13–60.098%11 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0229%8 Oct →
overpass16–140.0219%7 Oct →
dust216–140.0522%6 Oct →
mirage13–90.0128%6 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0416%5 Oct →
cache2–13-0.056%4 Oct →
ancient13–90.0136%4 Oct →
ancient11–130.0133%2 Oct →
anubis13–100.0317%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0225%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0421%2 Oct →
ancient13–90.0020%2 Oct →
anubis13–40.0228%1 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0138%1 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0435%1 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0417%1 Oct →
dust211–130.1034%1 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0118%1 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0324%30 Sept →
mirage7–130.0220%30 Sept →
dust213–110.0225%30 Sept →
anubis8–130.0121%29 Sept →
dust216–140.0119%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.0328%29 Sept →
anubis16–140.0528%29 Sept →
ancient13–80.0620%29 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0020%29 Sept →
mirage13–20.0119%29 Sept →
cache0–10-0.090%28 Sept →
ancient8–130.019%25 Sept →
mirage1–2-0.120%25 Sept →
mirage19–170.0139%25 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0116%25 Sept →
mirage13–80.0224%25 Sept →
dust27–130.0121%25 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0025%25 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0124%24 Sept →
anubis13–100.0022%23 Sept →
dust216–140.0420%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0220%23 Sept →
dust213–20.0323%23 Sept →
anubis13–60.0831%23 Sept →
mirage27–31-0.0033%22 Sept →
ancient10–130.0635%22 Sept →
mirage26–28-0.0529%22 Sept →
mirage5–130.0243%21 Sept →
dust213–20.0518%21 Sept →
ancient13–60.0029%21 Sept →
mirage13–110.0517%20 Sept →
dust29–130.0030%20 Sept →
anubis13–80.1220%19 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0518%19 Sept →
mirage16–140.0217%19 Sept →
nuke13–100.0831%19 Sept →
ancient8–130.0019%18 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0412%18 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.