✪ šofriii B/T/S

✪ šofriii B/T/S — CS2 Stats

SK76561198338280198[U:1:378014470]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

913Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,029Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,702Top 50% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74458 of 261504 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,357 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,702 -6,116 30 Jun – 10 Nov · 28 days played
20,11726,818peak 26,81830 Jun10 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,357 +0 4 Sept – 10 Sept · 2 observations
1,3571,357peak 1,3574 Sept10 Sept
26,818Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,357Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-06-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,357
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 174 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 6,116 below peak (26,818)
  • -1,499 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,267 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,298 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate44.1%48.2%50.9%6.8% short
Shot accuracy10.1%13.2%13.7%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio2.021.071.09above
Match win rate49.2%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ šofriii B/T/SFACEITLevel 9 · 1,357 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,702 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,357csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning35
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.8
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning3.5
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time662ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy25.7%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 3 Nov →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 13 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · office, 5 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 1 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 70% over 23anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2316–770%-0.01
dust2C208–1240%-0.01
infernoB147–750%0.00
cacheB136–746%0.02
nukeA106–460%0.01
anubisD81–713%-0.03
ancient—40–40%-0.02
poseidon—22–0100%0.04
office—20–20%-0.04
overpass—11–0100%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%0.03
italy—11–0100%0.02
train—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,453Lifetime kills
2.02K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players
2,698Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
44.1%Headshot %
10.1%Shot accuracy
6,456MVPs
1,523Hours (in match)
2,262Bombs planted
814Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,791
AWP6,225
FAMAS3,448
P2502,160
SG 5531,444

Lifetime map wins

5,176dust2
4,147inferno
1,733nuke
800train
532vertigo
314office
193cbble
92lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

396Matches
55%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
74.7ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5951%1.1514.1
Dust23571%1.2116.3
Inferno3462%1.2515.1
Anubis3053%1.0414.8
Nuke2070%1.1116.9
Ancient1724%1.0013.8
Vertigo560%1.2316.0
Cache5100%1.0313.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.4%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
650msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
31.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
10.05HE damage / grenade
12.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5793% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0418%10 Nov →
mirage13–10.2335%3 Nov →
dust23–90.0016%3 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0126%2 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0923%28 Oct →
inferno8–130.0225%27 Oct →
ancient13–160.0327%22 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0837%22 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0637%22 Oct →
inferno14–160.0419%22 Oct →
mirage1–6-0.090%21 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0218%21 Oct →
poseidon9–40.0731%21 Oct →
inferno9–130.0147%18 Oct →
ancient0–6-0.0140%18 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0114%18 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0025%13 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0018%7 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0153%15 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0336%11 Sept →
nuke6–130.0243%11 Sept →
nuke13–30.0426%2 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0516%2 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0126%2 Sept →
dust23–13-0.1233%1 Sept →
mirage8–00.0025%1 Sept →
overpass13–10-0.0220%1 Sept →
cache13–10.1140%1 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0919%1 Sept →
dust22–13-0.076%28 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.0113%28 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0424%27 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0513%19 Aug →
inferno13–100.0460%13 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0328%13 Aug →
poseidon9–60.0228%13 Aug →
dust213–60.0229%12 Aug →
dust213–50.0129%11 Aug →
anubis13–50.0519%11 Aug →
inferno13–30.0626%11 Aug →
mirage13–50.0417%10 Aug →
mirage13–70.0327%10 Aug →
inferno2–10-0.038%10 Aug →
dust213–50.0546%3 Aug →
inferno13–20.1517%3 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0519%3 Aug →
mirage5–00.0927%3 Aug →
dust213–50.0738%3 Aug →
nuke10–130.0228%3 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0022%3 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0741%3 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0435%3 Aug →
mirage13–50.0325%2 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0527%2 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0226%1 Aug →
cache5–130.0048%31 Jul →
cache11–130.0334%31 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0229%31 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0733%28 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0922%25 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0044%25 Jul →
dust22–130.0250%25 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0119%24 Jul →
cache13–50.1525%24 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0029%24 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0335%24 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0227%24 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0423%24 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0411%24 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0321%24 Jul →
office4–13-0.0429%23 Jul →
inferno13–100.1128%23 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0223%23 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0733%23 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0023%23 Jul →
mirage13–50.0014%23 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0729%23 Jul →
dust213–20.0122%23 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0833%23 Jul →
dust214–160.0023%23 Jul →
nuke13–50.0222%20 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0421%20 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0211%20 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0229%20 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0313%20 Jul →
vertigo8–80.0326%9 Jul →
cache13–100.1029%9 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0926%5 Jul →
office0–13-0.050%5 Jul →
italy13–50.0219%5 Jul →
inferno1–9-0.1718%5 Jul →
nuke13–40.0216%4 Jul →
nuke13–60.0911%1 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0327%1 Jul →
dust213–00.0124%1 Jul →
train11–130.0323%1 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0024%1 Jul →
dust218–22-0.0523%30 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.0525%30 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0535%29 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.