JayKay — CS2 Stats

76561198338073541[U:1:377807813]

751Tracked matches17%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,019Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,150Top 50% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#65274 of 251119 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,150 → 21,150
+1Tracked matches · now 751
0.0ppWin rate · 16.7% → 16.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,150 -1,495 16 Jul – 22 Sept · 30 days played
20,61023,313peak 23,31316 Jul22 Sept
23,313Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2026-04-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,163 below peak (23,313)
  • -1,304 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,850 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate44.0%45.7%46.8%2.8% short
Shot accuracy15.0%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.051.06above
Match win rate47.3%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJayKayFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,150 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning55
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD30–67–3Last 10030%Win rateLLWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 3–17 · 15% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.5
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch0.6

Sharp aimerStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms−91ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–13 · office, 24 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 9 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · vertigo, 22 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD3311–2233%0.01
ancientD195–1426%-0.00
infernoD133–1023%-0.01
cacheD113–827%0.01
dust2D92–722%-0.01
anubisA74–357%0.02
nuke—31–233%-0.00
vertigo—21–150%0.06
office—10–10%0.23
train—10–10%-0.07
overpass—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,409Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,513Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
44.0%Headshot %
15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
7,332MVPs
1,019Hours (in match)
2,949Bombs planted
711Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,582inferno
1,845dust2
673nuke
553vertigo
405train
171cbble
152office
53italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

152Matches
57%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
67.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5054%0.8713.6
Ancient2969%0.9814.6
Inferno2454%0.9413.2
Anubis1850%0.9414.2
Dust21250%0.8212.4
Nuke450%0.6610.8
Train20%0.8211.5
Overpass250%0.569.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.3%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
572msReaction time
43.5%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
6.12HE damage / grenade
8.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.5617% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–13-0.0410%11 Sept →
mirage3–130.0412%8 Sept →
ancient13–100.0815%8 Sept →
inferno13–60.0420%8 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0910%2 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0414%29 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0212%29 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0120%27 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0024%26 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0318%25 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.057%25 Aug →
cache5–130.1112%25 Aug →
office9–130.2324%24 Aug →
ancient2–130.0328%24 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0032%24 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0717%23 Aug →
train5–13-0.0718%23 Aug →
vertigo4–13-0.0122%22 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.023%20 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0312%19 Aug →
ancient5–130.0315%19 Aug →
cache13–90.0215%18 Aug →
cache7–130.0119%18 Aug →
anubis13–30.0219%18 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0210%17 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0019%17 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0319%15 Aug →
cache10–130.0628%15 Aug →
dust211–130.0829%15 Aug →
inferno4–130.0321%14 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0718%14 Aug →
anubis4–130.0816%14 Aug →
vertigo13–80.1440%13 Aug →
mirage13–70.0115%13 Aug →
cache13–16-0.0518%9 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0321%9 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0618%8 Aug →
anubis13–80.0222%8 Aug →
ancient13–60.0119%8 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0110%3 Aug →
mirage3–130.0632%2 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0624%2 Aug →
inferno8–130.0017%31 Jul →
mirage7–130.0119%31 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0022%29 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.054%29 Jul →
cache16–13-0.0223%27 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0410%27 Jul →
ancient7–130.0621%26 Jul →
mirage14–160.0319%26 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0110%25 Jul →
mirage8–130.0114%23 Jul →
inferno10–130.0125%22 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0121%21 Jul →
mirage6–130.0222%20 Jul →
ancient13–60.098%20 Jul →
mirage13–160.0222%19 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0621%16 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0416%15 Jul →
mirage13–80.0518%15 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0522%15 Jul →
mirage13–100.0716%15 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0211%12 Jul →
nuke13–90.0426%12 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0319%11 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.078%11 Jul →
mirage13–110.0220%11 Jul →
anubis13–70.1215%11 Jul →
cache7–130.0418%10 Jul →
mirage11–130.0617%10 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0223%10 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0119%10 Jul →
cache11–130.0830%9 Jul →
mirage13–20.1341%9 Jul →
dust213–100.0222%9 Jul →
mirage4–130.0218%8 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0215%7 Jul →
mirage5–20.0413%7 Jul →
dust23–130.0215%7 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0118%6 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0114%6 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0211%5 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0428%3 Jul →
overpass9–13-0.0515%2 Jul →
ancient5–130.0215%1 Jul →
mirage3–130.0220%1 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.049%28 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.004%28 Jun →
inferno4–130.0113%28 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0022%26 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0019%24 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0230%24 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0126%24 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0613%24 Jun →
mirage13–20.0528%19 Jun →
mirage6–130.0027%23 May →
dust212–120.0427%19 May →
dust26–13-0.1123%18 May →
anubis13–8-0.0410%18 May →
mirage13–3-0.0113%19 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.