PiktaS ;(

PiktaS ;( — CS2 Stats

76561198963582384[U:1:1003316656]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

627Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
933Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#81777 of 251119 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,648 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +102 18 May – 30 Sept · 40 days played
16,91719,999peak 19,99918 May30 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,648Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-05-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,648
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 103 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,999
  • +2,431 over 30 days · improving
  • +527 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.0%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy14.8%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.181.061.07above
Match win rate45.7%46.3%46.9%1.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPiktaS ;(FACEITLevel 8 · 1,648 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,648csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning63
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–60–2Last 10038%Win rateWLWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.4
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.3
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time578ms−90ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 6 Jul →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 8 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 8 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 17 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11ancientWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD3311–2233%0.03
ancientD164–1225%-0.01
cacheB126–650%0.01
dust2D113–827%0.00
anubisA117–464%0.02
infernoA85–363%0.01
nukeD82–625%0.03
overpass—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,782Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
2,159Matches
45.7%Match win rate
48.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
6,654MVPs
933Hours (in match)
1,551Bombs planted
517Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,792inferno
1,659dust2
1,071nuke
673train
632vertigo
175office
161cbble
99lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

192Matches
54%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
77.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5456%1.2516.9
Ancient3259%1.1816.6
Anubis1638%1.0917.4
Dust21553%1.0916.8
Inferno1060%1.1018.2
Nuke367%1.1916.3
Vertigo250%0.8915.5
Overpass20%1.2520.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
589msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
11.21HE damage / grenade
4.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2927% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.1033%30 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0611%29 Sept →
inferno13–80.0118%29 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0520%26 Sept →
dust213–70.0518%24 Sept →
dust213–30.0727%23 Sept →
anubis13–80.0828%23 Sept →
inferno10–130.0216%22 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0520%21 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0526%18 Sept →
mirage7–130.0322%18 Sept →
anubis13–110.0635%15 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0523%13 Sept →
cache13–100.1018%13 Sept →
inferno16–140.0625%12 Sept →
mirage8–130.0232%12 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0423%11 Sept →
nuke11–130.1318%9 Sept →
anubis13–30.0524%9 Sept →
inferno13–110.0619%9 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0343%8 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0020%8 Sept →
inferno13–60.0115%8 Sept →
anubis16–140.0821%7 Sept →
nuke13–30.1326%6 Sept →
mirage7–130.0524%2 Sept →
mirage13–40.1120%2 Sept →
cache4–130.0122%2 Sept →
dust24–130.0328%1 Sept →
ancient7–130.0122%30 Aug →
mirage3–130.1030%30 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0324%29 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0636%29 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0418%29 Aug →
cache13–90.0128%29 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0227%29 Aug →
mirage13–90.0222%29 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0916%24 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0334%24 Aug →
anubis13–80.0338%24 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0619%23 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0518%23 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0519%21 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0216%21 Aug →
cache13–90.0621%21 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0420%20 Aug →
mirage13–60.1123%17 Aug →
mirage13–20.0720%17 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0427%17 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0116%17 Aug →
mirage13–110.0125%16 Aug →
cache11–130.0229%16 Aug →
ancient13–110.0329%8 Aug →
anubis13–80.0632%8 Aug →
ancient13–60.0136%8 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0126%8 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0434%8 Aug →
dust213–90.0325%8 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0124%29 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0232%29 Jul →
cache16–130.0519%27 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0333%27 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0030%23 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0435%23 Jul →
mirage1–130.0422%20 Jul →
mirage13–160.0722%19 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0428%13 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0422%13 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0020%13 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0315%12 Jul →
nuke13–90.0431%12 Jul →
mirage9–130.0126%11 Jul →
mirage7–130.1422%9 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0327%8 Jul →
nuke6–130.0742%7 Jul →
mirage5–20.1327%7 Jul →
mirage13–70.1817%6 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0123%5 Jul →
overpass9–13-0.0127%2 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0242%1 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0229%1 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0411%30 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.0520%28 Jun →
ancient7–130.1023%28 Jun →
mirage9–130.0924%26 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0114%25 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0229%25 Jun →
ancient10–130.0615%24 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0331%24 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0233%21 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0333%19 Jun →
mirage13–20.0833%19 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.055%18 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0318%18 Jun →
mirage8–130.0314%26 May →
nuke9–130.0116%25 May →
mirage8–13-0.0822%25 May →
dust26–130.0316%18 May →
anubis13–80.0223%18 May →
mirage9–130.0130%18 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.