juuhan

juuhan — CS2 Stats

FI76561198337261778[U:1:376996050]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,508Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,705Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,298Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#73219 of 238854 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,083 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 23 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,298 -4,391 23 May15 Sept · 22 days played
18,23024,861peak 24,86123 May15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,083 +0 31 Aug10 Sept · 4 observations
2,0832,083peak 2,08331 Aug10 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,083Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-05-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,083
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 417 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,563 below peak (24,861)
  • -3,563 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,702 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate58.2%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy15.5%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.911.061.070.16 short
Match win rate45.8%46.3%46.9%1.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjuuhanFACEITLevel 8 · 2,083 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,298 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,083csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning58
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45523Last 10045%Win rateLWWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time657ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 732ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · anubis, 13 Sept
64%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 11 Jul
477msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 25 May
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 2 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 15overpassWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB33161748%-0.01
ancientA159660%-0.02
nukeC125742%-0.02
infernoB115645%0.00
anubisC83538%-0.01
dust2A74357%-0.03
cacheD61517%-0.02
overpassD5050%-0.04
vertigo220100%-0.02
train1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

264,495Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
9,933Matches
45.8%Match win rate
58.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
26,772MVPs
5,084Hours (in match)
7,121Bombs planted
7,650Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47103,640
AWP17,450
Glock-1811,742
MP94,062
FAMAS3,284
MAC-103,203

Lifetime map wins

22,026inferno
12,348nuke
11,595train
10,856vertigo
7,827dust2
340cbble
231office
40lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,526Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
72.5ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18457%1.1015.2
Nuke13154%1.0915.8
Ancient12453%0.9814.3
Inferno10349%1.0915.6
Vertigo4556%1.0215.5
Anubis3829%0.8613.9
Dust23139%0.8614.0
Overpass1839%1.0615.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
658msReaction time
31.4%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
11.87HE damage / grenade
9.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3887 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.3583% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass3–13-0.0517%17 Sept
dust213–10-0.0324%17 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0312%17 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0219%17 Sept
dust213–11-0.0820%16 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0626%16 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0613%15 Sept
nuke13–30.0125%15 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0533%15 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0120%14 Sept
ancient16–12-0.0918%14 Sept
inferno1–13-0.1029%14 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0425%14 Sept
inferno13–50.1125%14 Sept
mirage6–130.0523%13 Sept
anubis13–80.1531%13 Sept
cache7–13-0.0327%12 Sept
anubis12–160.0224%11 Sept
mirage14–160.0017%8 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0516%7 Sept
cache8–13-0.0716%6 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0419%5 Sept
nuke6–130.0324%5 Sept
inferno16–12-0.0125%4 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0917%3 Sept
nuke13–80.0425%3 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0914%2 Sept
mirage13–10.1219%2 Sept
ancient8–13-0.085%2 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0223%1 Sept
mirage15–150.0219%1 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0219%1 Sept
inferno13–80.0133%31 Aug
mirage13–70.0110%31 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0034%31 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0024%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.0128%15 Aug
overpass10–13-0.0818%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.0315%14 Aug
nuke11–8-0.0224%14 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0821%8 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0118%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0334%2 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0127%2 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0538%25 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0315%25 Jul
inferno13–90.0825%21 Jul
ancient13–70.0026%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0826%15 Jul
cache8–13-0.0225%15 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0422%15 Jul
inferno7–130.0037%14 Jul
dust211–130.0222%13 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0722%13 Jul
inferno8–130.0464%11 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0321%10 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0114%9 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0924%8 Jul
cache13–70.0440%8 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0419%8 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0416%7 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0218%7 Jul
mirage13–40.0736%4 Jul
mirage13–80.0421%4 Jul
overpass11–13-0.0222%2 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0415%2 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0533%1 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0916%1 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0725%30 Jun
dust213–6-0.0534%30 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0430%26 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0718%26 Jun
dust213–50.0424%26 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0424%26 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0350%24 Jun
mirage13–70.0120%24 Jun
vertigo13–5-0.0026%18 Jun
cache4–13-0.0717%18 Jun
overpass7–130.0119%18 Jun
mirage6–100.0129%14 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0219%12 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0021%10 Jun
ancient13–100.0125%6 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0119%6 Jun
nuke8–130.0019%5 Jun
ancient13–30.0324%5 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0515%5 Jun
nuke12–12-0.0534%4 Jun
train4–130.0322%3 Jun
dust21–13-0.1033%3 Jun
inferno6–130.0622%29 May
anubis13–20.0346%29 May
mirage13–7-0.0420%26 May
anubis11–13-0.069%26 May
overpass8–13-0.0731%26 May
ancient13–110.0828%26 May
nuke5–130.0321%25 May
mirage13–60.0222%24 May
mirage4–13-0.0221%24 May
mirage16–14-0.0026%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →