s мu

s мu — CS2 Stats

76561198336407060[U:1:376141332]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

578Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,025Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,822Purple band · top ~21.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 946 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,822 -641 11 Oct – 30 Oct · 6 days played
16,82217,500peak 17,50011 Oct30 Oct
17,500Peak Premier in tracked matches
946Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-10-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 946
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 105 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 678 below peak (17,500)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,178 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate43.4%43.8%44.8%1.4% short
Shot accuracy16.5%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.291.021.03above
Match win rate48.3%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGs мuFACEITLevel 5 · 946 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,822 · Purple bandPEAK ELO946csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning50
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–55–1Last 10044%Win rateLLLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility7.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch3.8

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.0
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time495ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 501ms → last ⅓ avg 495ms
Headshot accuracy13.7%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 13 Oct →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 18 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · nuke, 12 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 18infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC239–1439%-0.00
anubisB1910–953%0.00
dust2A1811–761%0.01
nukeB136–746%-0.01
cacheC104–640%0.01
ancientD93–633%-0.02
infernoD81–713%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,003Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
3,352Matches
48.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
43.4%Headshot %
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
7,840MVPs
1,173Hours (in match)
3,551Bombs planted
726Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,270
AWP4,868
P2502,469
MP71,494
SG 5531,393
SSG 081,355

Lifetime map wins

3,434inferno
2,888dust2
1,581train
1,364cbble
1,185vertigo
862nuke
105lake
100assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
48%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
75.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4941%1.0315.6
Nuke3250%1.1015.4
Inferno2938%1.0816.2
Anubis2948%1.0216.0
Dust22665%1.0615.2
Ancient2631%1.0913.7
Cache2157%1.1015.3
Overpass333%0.9315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.0%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
499msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
32.3%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
11.13HE damage / grenade
15.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0295% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7824% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0113%3 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0410%3 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0019%3 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0012%2 Nov →
anubis9–13-0.0212%2 Nov →
mirage14–16-0.0218%2 Nov →
dust213–30.0425%2 Nov →
anubis13–70.0415%2 Nov →
anubis19–17-0.0410%1 Nov →
dust219–17-0.0020%1 Nov →
anubis11–130.0217%1 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0710%30 Oct →
nuke16–19-0.0213%30 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.017%30 Oct →
inferno9–50.0927%30 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0313%29 Oct →
mirage11–130.0213%29 Oct →
anubis11–130.017%29 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.047%29 Oct →
anubis9–130.0225%29 Oct →
cache9–130.017%28 Oct →
anubis8–130.0210%27 Oct →
dust213–70.0120%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0111%27 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0116%26 Oct →
cache14–16-0.037%26 Oct →
anubis13–110.046%26 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0216%26 Oct →
anubis19–22-0.016%25 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0115%25 Oct →
dust213–100.0120%24 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.046%24 Oct →
nuke19–150.0118%21 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0212%21 Oct →
cache10–130.0112%21 Oct →
anubis16–140.0016%21 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0114%20 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0215%20 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0412%20 Oct →
cache13–60.0116%20 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0910%20 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0612%19 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.055%19 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0715%18 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.016%18 Oct →
mirage9–130.0213%18 Oct →
dust213–90.0521%18 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0032%18 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.034%17 Oct →
mirage13–40.0523%17 Oct →
dust213–80.0014%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.073%16 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0524%16 Oct →
mirage19–160.0217%16 Oct →
anubis13–80.0018%15 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.046%15 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0521%15 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0114%15 Oct →
mirage13–80.0310%15 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.079%14 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.016%14 Oct →
dust216–140.0015%13 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.019%13 Oct →
dust213–100.1112%13 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0513%13 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0511%13 Oct →
cache13–70.0519%12 Oct →
mirage13–70.0513%12 Oct →
dust212–160.0217%12 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0115%12 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0313%11 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0220%11 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0115%11 Oct →
nuke13–40.0713%11 Oct →
nuke15–150.0114%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.013%11 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0511%11 Oct →
anubis10–130.0519%10 Oct →
mirage13–10.0518%10 Oct →
nuke11–130.0217%10 Oct →
anubis13–50.0214%10 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.058%10 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0715%9 Oct →
cache13–90.0110%9 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.026%9 Oct →
dust219–16-0.0111%9 Oct →
mirage6–130.0714%9 Oct →
mirage11–130.0412%8 Oct →
nuke8–130.027%8 Oct →
mirage13–110.0120%8 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.117%8 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0616%7 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0316%7 Oct →
inferno9–130.0020%7 Oct →
nuke13–110.0212%7 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0113%6 Oct →
ancient5–130.0829%6 Oct →
mirage13–40.0416%6 Oct →
cache7–130.0010%6 Oct →
cache13–40.0521%5 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.