acoG

acoG — CS2 Stats

ME76561198332550439[U:1:372284711]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,052Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,109Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating19,878Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79739 of 231770 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,567 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,052 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 55 days played since 22 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,878 +3,426 22 Dec17 Sept · 37 days played
16,45222,869peak 22,86922 Dec17 Sept
23,003Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,567Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2025-12-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,567
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 184 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,991 below peak (22,869)
  • -121 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 122 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.0%48.3%51.0%7.9% short
Shot accuracy20.9%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.411.071.09above
Match win rate38.3%46.9%48.4%10.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGacoGFACEITLevel 9 · 1,567 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,878 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,567csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning63
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52471Last 10052%Win rateLLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.8pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.1
Utility5.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch5.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time569ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 31 Dec
48%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 14 May
375msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · mirage, 21 Feb
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 14 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 22dust2Weakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29151452%0.02
infernoS2216673%0.04
nukeA1710759%0.02
dust2C125742%0.02
anubisA53260%0.02
ancient4040%0.01
overpass42250%0.03
cache2020%0.09
stronghold21150%0.06
warden2020%0.03
alpine1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

112,580Lifetime kills
1.41K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players
5,262Matches
38.3%Match win rate
43.0%Headshot %
20.9%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 9 players
8,248MVPs
1,913Hours (in match)
2,658Bombs planted
920Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,015
AWP8,999
MP93,512
SG 5532,784
MAC-102,572

Lifetime map wins

5,326inferno
3,956dust2
2,706nuke
1,600train
997vertigo
259cbble
200ar_shoots
181safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

196Matches
60%Win rate
1.57Avg K/D
85.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2454%1.5018.2
Dust21464%1.3317.6
Nuke771%1.1013.9
Inferno771%1.7220.4
Vertigo475%2.2822.5
Overpass450%1.8822.0
Anubis333%0.789.7
Ancient250%0.8412.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
564msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
9.03HE damage / grenade
8.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5462% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.0918%23 Jun
mirage7–130.0213%16 Jun
dust219–160.0125%16 Jun
anubis2–13-0.055%15 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0421%15 Jun
inferno13–60.0118%4 Jun
nuke13–50.0120%25 May
nuke13–100.0312%25 May
cache11–130.1114%16 May
nuke13–160.0423%16 May
dust23–130.0448%14 May
mirage3–13-0.024%14 May
dust214–160.0236%9 May
mirage13–110.0324%8 May
cache11–130.0620%3 May
inferno13–100.0121%23 Apr
mirage13–100.0317%23 Apr
mirage13–100.0314%23 Apr
dust213–90.0123%21 Apr
mirage13–60.0020%20 Apr
anubis13–50.0418%19 Apr
dust213–30.0513%17 Apr
inferno13–70.0228%17 Apr
inferno11–130.0614%15 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0321%15 Apr
mirage13–10.0721%14 Apr
inferno7–130.1115%11 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0121%10 Apr
mirage13–80.0419%10 Apr
dust213–30.0221%10 Apr
dust27–13-0.0515%10 Apr
inferno13–90.0721%7 Apr
nuke13–60.0614%7 Apr
mirage10–130.0811%6 Apr
nuke11–130.0524%5 Apr
nuke13–100.0930%5 Apr
inferno13–30.0225%5 Apr
mirage16–130.0419%3 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0522%3 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0317%3 Apr
ancient11–130.0725%28 Mar
mirage6–130.0116%28 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0414%27 Mar
inferno11–130.0226%23 Mar
nuke13–100.0714%22 Mar
dust28–130.0220%22 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0423%20 Mar
mirage10–130.0318%14 Mar
inferno13–110.0725%10 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0421%10 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0223%10 Mar
stronghold5–130.0230%7 Mar
alpine4–130.064%7 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0516%7 Mar
mirage13–30.0724%6 Mar
dust210–130.0426%2 Mar
dust215–15-0.0137%2 Mar
inferno13–10.1732%2 Mar
nuke13–30.0414%2 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0626%2 Mar
overpass16–140.1019%1 Mar
mirage13–50.1917%1 Mar
dust23–130.0127%1 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0318%27 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0811%27 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0523%27 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0416%27 Feb
anubis13–110.0412%24 Feb
mirage3–130.0720%24 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0316%22 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0133%21 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0214%19 Feb
inferno13–50.0720%19 Feb
dust213–100.0518%19 Feb
nuke13–100.0119%18 Feb
warden11–130.0213%14 Feb
warden3–60.0425%14 Feb
stronghold13–90.1018%13 Feb
inferno13–80.0922%10 Feb
mirage13–10.0726%10 Feb
anubis13–40.0521%6 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0022%6 Feb
overpass6–130.0115%31 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0215%31 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0620%30 Jan
inferno13–110.0121%30 Jan
inferno13–60.0746%25 Jan
anubis9–130.0111%24 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0720%24 Jan
inferno13–100.0312%22 Jan
nuke13–80.0421%22 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0113%16 Jan
inferno10–130.0124%16 Jan
nuke13–110.0324%15 Jan
overpass13–70.0711%2 Jan
nuke9–130.0518%2 Jan
ancient10–130.018%31 Dec
inferno13–20.2129%31 Dec
mirage13–40.1525%25 Dec
inferno6–130.0118%22 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →