freed from desyia

freed from desyia — CS2 Stats

GB76561198325243258[U:1:364977530]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,286Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,787Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+38Tracked matches · now 1,286
+3.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,679 -1,098 22 Jun – 28 Jun · 4 days played
17,98319,777peak 19,77722 Jun28 Jun
19,786Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-06-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches105——
Win rate45%——
K/D0.69——
Headshot %55%——

Measured 8 Sep 2026 → 12 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate60.5%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy9.4%13.3%13.7%4.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.071.090.09 short
Match win rate49.7%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfreed from desyiaFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning62
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateWWWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.1pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.2
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.2
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time499ms−90ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 29 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 7 Sept →
297msFastest reaction time · 4–8 · anubis, 10 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 24 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W5Current streak
11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16infernoWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1810–856%0.01
anubisA1810–856%-0.00
mirageA1710–759%0.02
ancientA1610–663%0.02
infernoC156–940%0.01
dust2A116–555%0.03
cache—32–167%0.01
vertigo—21–150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

174,539Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
3,371Matches
49.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
60.5%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
9.4%Shot accuracy
12,050MVPs
3,542Hours (in match)
4,227Bombs planted
2,094Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4792,994
AWP23,634
FAMAS3,506
MP92,207
Knife2,074

Lifetime map wins

6,995dust2
6,111inferno
2,243train
2,080nuke
1,177cbble
770vertigo
222militia
118lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,276Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
75.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15248%0.9814.6
Mirage14649%1.0415.3
Anubis13352%1.0716.0
Dust212656%1.1215.4
Inferno12553%1.0614.9
Nuke7057%1.0815.9
Cache1533%0.9714.8
Train922%0.9015.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
496msReaction time
50.4%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
7.41HE damage / grenade
5.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0522%10 Oct →
anubis13–60.0116%28 Sept →
cache13–70.0714%28 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0013%18 Sept →
anubis13–110.0619%16 Sept →
dust26–13-0.045%15 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0526%15 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0219%15 Sept →
inferno11–130.1116%11 Sept →
anubis4–8-0.0113%10 Sept →
nuke13–110.1226%10 Sept →
ancient13–60.0217%10 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.035%8 Sept →
nuke13–50.0650%7 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.049%7 Sept →
dust213–30.1224%3 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0218%3 Sept →
nuke9–130.0110%2 Sept →
ancient13–50.0825%1 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0629%1 Sept →
vertigo9–5-0.025%1 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0316%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0722%26 Aug →
mirage13–60.0416%26 Aug →
inferno9–130.0120%19 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0633%19 Aug →
mirage11–130.0025%17 Aug →
dust213–90.0017%17 Aug →
anubis14–160.0116%16 Aug →
inferno11–130.0127%12 Aug →
inferno20–22-0.0318%12 Aug →
inferno11–130.0522%11 Aug →
anubis13–100.0720%10 Aug →
inferno13–30.0840%10 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0311%10 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0421%7 Aug →
mirage13–110.0212%3 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0216%3 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0611%30 Jul →
nuke17–190.0245%29 Jul →
mirage13–100.0211%29 Jul →
mirage13–20.1315%29 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0427%28 Jul →
nuke13–90.0217%28 Jul →
anubis13–90.0121%27 Jul →
nuke13–60.0440%27 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0133%22 Jul →
nuke13–20.0138%22 Jul →
nuke13–40.0524%22 Jul →
inferno13–30.0040%20 Jul →
ancient13–80.0621%19 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0122%18 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0248%18 Jul →
nuke19–16-0.069%18 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0317%17 Jul →
nuke8–130.0212%17 Jul →
anubis13–70.0227%16 Jul →
mirage16–140.0120%16 Jul →
inferno13–80.0529%16 Jul →
mirage16–140.1234%16 Jul →
inferno13–10.0730%15 Jul →
mirage8–130.0035%15 Jul →
dust213–90.0728%15 Jul →
mirage13–80.0721%14 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0523%14 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0116%14 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0217%14 Jul →
ancient13–60.1234%13 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0139%13 Jul →
vertigo4–90.0141%13 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0420%12 Jul →
ancient16–14-0.006%6 Jul →
anubis7–130.0126%4 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0718%3 Jul →
ancient13–110.0210%2 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.0317%2 Jul →
ancient14–160.0722%29 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0215%28 Jun →
dust216–140.0514%28 Jun →
ancient11–130.0543%27 Jun →
dust29–130.0130%26 Jun →
dust213–60.0531%26 Jun →
cache13–40.0119%26 Jun →
ancient13–00.0716%24 Jun →
ancient3–130.0119%24 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0124%24 Jun →
mirage13–70.1123%24 Jun →
nuke6–130.0920%24 Jun →
dust25–100.0030%24 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0414%24 Jun →
mirage13–80.0520%24 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0215%24 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0629%24 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0712%24 Jun →
anubis6–130.0016%24 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0016%23 Jun →
anubis13–30.1024%23 Jun →
dust26–130.0327%23 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0120%22 Jun →
dust28–130.0221%22 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.