r0bInI0

r0bInI0 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198323610414[U:1:363344686]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

357Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
455Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingClutch Specialist
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (47 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 357
−3.4ppWin rate · 44.8% → 41.4%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,224 -1,136 21 Apr – 4 Jul · 23 days played
16,78218,913peak 18,91321 Apr4 Jul
19,059Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-04-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning49
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLWLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −8.2pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.8 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility4.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time602ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–3 · nuke, 24 May →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · nuke, 26 Jun →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · shelter, 10 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 15 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 18mirageWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB4321–2249%0.01
dust2A1811–761%0.01
mirageD165–1131%-0.00
infernoD62–433%0.01
nuke—32–167%0.08
office—32–167%0.00
anubis—31–233%0.03
ancient—21–150%0.01
shelter—11–0100%-0.03
alpine—10–10%-0.04
train—10–10%-0.06
stronghold—10–10%0.02
warden—11–0100%0.05
overpass—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,257Lifetime kills
1.43K/D · Top 5% of tracked players
1,264Matches
39.8%Match win rate
59.1%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
8.1%Shot accuracy
2,028MVPs
455Hours (in match)
853Bombs planted
467Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,220dust2
971inferno
339nuke
216vertigo
189office
136train
45safehouse
35assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches
78%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
73.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

83%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4100%0.8513.0
Mirage333%0.6811.7
Dust22100%1.3214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
595msReaction time
20.4%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
6.82HE damage / grenade
10.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.3587% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.0524%23 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0210%29 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0217%10 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0417%22 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0315%19 Jul →
dust213–80.0321%14 Jul →
shelter13–9-0.0314%10 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.083%4 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0420%1 Jul →
office13–10-0.0114%28 Jun →
nuke13–20.0940%26 Jun →
alpine6–13-0.0418%18 Jun →
ancient14–16-0.0119%14 Jun →
inferno15–150.0221%14 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0518%13 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0124%12 Jun →
dust213–80.0518%12 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0324%7 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0030%6 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0124%5 Jun →
ancient13–90.0418%3 Jun →
cache5–130.0017%2 Jun →
anubis13–70.0518%1 Jun →
dust213–100.0423%30 May →
dust211–130.0325%30 May →
cache13–30.0930%25 May →
nuke9–30.1933%24 May →
inferno9–30.1033%24 May →
anubis6–13-0.0115%24 May →
mirage13–9-0.0014%24 May →
cache4–100.0240%24 May →
mirage9–130.0422%20 May →
cache13–110.0619%20 May →
cache13–110.0217%20 May →
cache4–13-0.0124%17 May →
cache13–40.0027%17 May →
mirage8–13-0.0617%16 May →
cache9–13-0.0110%16 May →
office11–13-0.0623%15 May →
cache13–1-0.014%15 May →
cache12–120.0718%14 May →
cache12–12-0.0015%12 May →
mirage13–16-0.069%12 May →
mirage13–80.0420%12 May →
cache11–130.0118%11 May →
cache13–90.0223%11 May →
cache7–13-0.0521%11 May →
cache13–7-0.0217%11 May →
cache8–13-0.0419%11 May →
cache13–60.0927%10 May →
cache13–110.0217%10 May →
cache13–70.1117%10 May →
cache11–13-0.0517%10 May →
cache13–50.0116%10 May →
cache13–40.0020%10 May →
dust27–13-0.0812%9 May →
cache6–13-0.0215%9 May →
cache13–90.0219%9 May →
cache13–10.0314%9 May →
dust213–80.0517%8 May →
dust216–140.0123%6 May →
mirage8–130.0115%6 May →
cache13–50.1022%4 May →
cache8–13-0.0217%3 May →
cache13–80.0815%3 May →
dust211–130.0720%2 May →
mirage9–130.0322%2 May →
cache13–8-0.0120%1 May →
cache6–13-0.109%1 May →
cache4–130.0220%1 May →
cache13–100.0218%1 May →
cache13–100.0517%1 May →
cache11–13-0.0617%1 May →
cache4–13-0.0030%1 May →
cache13–2-0.0313%30 Apr →
cache13–50.1316%29 Apr →
inferno13–70.0132%28 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0420%27 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0920%27 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0416%27 Apr →
mirage5–130.0119%26 Apr →
dust213–80.0611%26 Apr →
train1–13-0.0625%26 Apr →
dust213–70.1025%26 Apr →
stronghold6–130.0223%25 Apr →
dust213–110.017%25 Apr →
mirage6–130.0218%25 Apr →
warden13–100.0522%25 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0036%24 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0117%24 Apr →
anubis6–130.066%23 Apr →
overpass13–5-0.047%23 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0319%23 Apr →
mirage13–60.0314%23 Apr →
office13–80.0818%23 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0417%22 Apr →
mirage13–30.0314%22 Apr →
dust210–40.0213%22 Apr →
mirage11–130.0124%21 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0220%21 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.