Equanimity Hoe

Equanimity Hoe — CS2 Stats

US76561198322547618[U:1:362281890]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,013Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,196Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating17,187Purple band · top ~19.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,187 -1,231 5 Jul – 30 Sept · 30 days played
16,95719,999peak 19,9995 Jul30 Sept
20,229Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-07-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,812 below peak (19,999)
  • -200 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,231 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,813 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches1226−14
Win rate33%50%−17pp
K/D0.750.74+0.01
Headshot %27%49%−22pp

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; previous 18 Sep 2026 → 25 Sep 2026.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches44——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.72——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 31 Aug 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate37.6%42.7%43.8%6.1% short
Shot accuracy14.9%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.720.991.020.29 short
Match win rate42.5%43.9%44.7%2.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEquanimity HoeFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,187 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning34
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateLLLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility3.9
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 63% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning3.4
Utility3.9
Mechanics3.0
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact1.4

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time643ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 10.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–7 · cache, 29 Jul →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · ancient, 30 Jul →
453msFastest reaction time · 9–5 · poseidon, 2 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 21 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 52% over 21anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2111–1052%-0.03
ancientC208–1240%-0.04
dust2C156–940%-0.04
cacheB115–645%-0.05
anubisC114–736%-0.03
nukeC114–736%-0.06
infernoB63–350%-0.02
boulder—10–10%-0.12
eldorado—10–10%-0.05
debris—10–10%0.01
poseidon—11–0100%-0.10
overpass—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,480Lifetime kills
0.72K/D
3,203Matches
42.5%Match win rate
37.6%Headshot %
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,782MVPs
1,196Hours (in match)
2,435Bombs planted
453Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-479,531
AWP3,409
AUG2,171
SG 5531,317
FAMAS1,229
MP71,225

Lifetime map wins

4,617inferno
3,926dust2
2,671nuke
1,687vertigo
748train
253office
135lake
103cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

944Matches
48%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
67.2ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8755%0.9212.7
Ancient4648%0.7411.6
Anubis3656%0.8412.8
Dust23241%0.7613.1
Vertigo2854%0.8213.5
Nuke2748%0.8015.0
Inferno2442%0.8413.5
Overpass838%0.8414.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.1%Spray accuracy
63.4%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
623msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
31.8%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
6.06HE damage / grenade
3.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.4868° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3999% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4814 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.104%1 Oct →
dust23–130.029%30 Sept →
mirage0–5-0.0920%26 Sept →
ancient13–20.009%26 Sept →
cache13–16-0.118%25 Sept →
anubis13–30.0117%25 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.067%25 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.016%25 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0628%24 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0122%24 Sept →
inferno9–40.0517%23 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.095%23 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0510%23 Sept →
dust215–15-0.095%22 Sept →
mirage16–130.0413%22 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.060%21 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0612%21 Sept →
ancient13–90.0120%21 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.054%18 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0220%18 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0519%18 Sept →
dust213–110.0119%14 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0917%1 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0419%31 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0635%31 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.1017%28 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0217%28 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0419%28 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0315%27 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0612%23 Aug →
dust213–9-0.004%14 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0410%14 Aug →
dust210–13-0.068%4 Aug →
boulder4–13-0.125%4 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0512%4 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.060%2 Aug →
eldorado4–9-0.0525%2 Aug →
debris8–80.0110%2 Aug →
poseidon9–5-0.108%2 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0610%1 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.045%1 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0415%30 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0720%30 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0537%30 Jul →
cache13–70.0620%29 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0314%29 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.068%29 Jul →
cache5–0-0.020%29 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.016%28 Jul →
cache13–80.0111%28 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.069%28 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0311%27 Jul →
anubis13–50.0015%27 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0514%27 Jul →
cache8–13-0.097%27 Jul →
dust26–13-0.098%27 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0513%27 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.037%25 Jul →
ancient9–130.0310%24 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.057%24 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.027%23 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0714%23 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0518%23 Jul →
dust216–140.0312%23 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0311%23 Jul →
mirage13–100.0511%23 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0818%23 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0110%23 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0316%22 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0116%22 Jul →
cache12–16-0.0410%22 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0611%22 Jul →
inferno13–1-0.0319%21 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0218%21 Jul →
dust24–13-0.1013%21 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.120%21 Jul →
mirage13–80.035%21 Jul →
ancient13–2-0.0116%21 Jul →
nuke14–16-0.075%20 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.046%20 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0311%19 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0521%19 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0419%14 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.048%14 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0111%13 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.085%13 Jul →
cache13–3-0.1113%13 Jul →
anubis13–3-0.0112%13 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0312%12 Jul →
dust213–7-0.015%12 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0614%11 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0614%10 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.069%9 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.094%9 Jul →
ancient13–40.0111%9 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.013%6 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0311%6 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.062%5 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.027%5 Jul →
overpass13–9-0.0418%5 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.