Razrヅ

Razrヅ — CS2 Stats

76561198321618384[U:1:361352656]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,730Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,137Hours in CS50Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,682Blue band · top ~40.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 628 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,682 +2,116 21 Jul – 13 Oct · 23 days played
10,45913,562peak 13,56221 Jul13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 628 +0 30 Aug – 21 Sept · 3 observations
628628peak 62830 Aug21 Sept
13,830Peak Premier in tracked matches
628Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-07-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 628
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 880 below peak (13,562)
  • -3 over 30 days · steady
  • +2,116 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,318 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches88——
Win rate47%——
K/D0.98——
Headshot %52%——

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,247), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate56.9%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy11.8%11.3%12.0%meets
Kill/death ratio0.840.991.020.17 short
Match win rate40.7%43.9%44.7%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRazrヅFACEITLevel 4 · 628 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,682 · Blue bandPEAK ELO628csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning49
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateWWWWWWWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 8–1–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility3.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.9
Utility3.2
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact6.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time523ms−143ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 4 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · office, 10 Oct →
320msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 12 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 14 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 78% over 18officeWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1814–478%0.02
mirageB157–847%-0.02
nukeA127–558%0.00
officeD112–918%-0.03
anubisA117–464%-0.01
dust2D103–730%-0.03
infernoD93–633%-0.04
cacheD62–433%0.00
train—31–233%-0.04
shelter—22–0100%-0.04
vertigo—10–10%-0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.01
italy—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

109,548Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
5,493Matches
40.7%Match win rate
56.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
11.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
11,195MVPs
2,406Hours (in match)
3,689Bombs planted
2,009Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,982
AWP17,694
SSG 085,142
Knife2,236
MAC-101,625

Lifetime map wins

8,459dust2
6,420inferno
4,141nuke
2,855vertigo
1,250train
649cbble
438ar_shoots
437lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

777Matches
47%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
66.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4949%0.7712.6
Anubis4542%0.7912.4
Ancient3949%0.7611.4
Inferno3959%0.8012.9
Nuke2952%0.9012.7
Vertigo2857%0.8013.1
Dust21735%0.8313.2
Overpass1118%0.7711.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
524msReaction time
50.4%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
11.32HE damage / grenade
2.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.469 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
shelter13–11-0.0639%14 Oct →
office13–90.0048%14 Oct →
ancient13–60.0524%13 Oct →
anubis13–80.0423%13 Oct →
anubis13–110.0313%12 Oct →
nuke13–40.1021%12 Oct →
nuke13–70.0411%12 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0229%11 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0018%10 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0323%10 Oct →
office9–130.0050%10 Oct →
overpass13–110.0140%10 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0629%8 Oct →
mirage25–230.0117%8 Oct →
ancient13–70.0215%8 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0630%7 Oct →
train12–12-0.0212%7 Oct →
dust213–80.0350%6 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0719%6 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0420%4 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.076%2 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0811%2 Oct →
cache13–80.0525%2 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0619%2 Oct →
anubis9–130.0029%29 Sept →
office11–13-0.0614%29 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0318%29 Sept →
ancient15–150.0420%28 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0521%28 Sept →
nuke13–110.0030%25 Sept →
ancient13–110.0033%22 Sept →
ancient13–80.0428%22 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0220%20 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0513%20 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0420%20 Sept →
italy13–100.0244%20 Sept →
train12–12-0.0424%18 Sept →
office8–130.0618%18 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0232%18 Sept →
nuke13–100.0647%18 Sept →
ancient13–40.0738%18 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0424%17 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0424%15 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0026%15 Sept →
dust210–130.0140%15 Sept →
anubis13–50.0017%14 Sept →
mirage13–20.0817%14 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0117%14 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0222%13 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0924%12 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0924%12 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0718%12 Sept →
cache11–130.0543%12 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0318%12 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0544%4 Sept →
mirage13–40.1529%4 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0615%4 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0426%31 Aug →
ancient13–30.0821%31 Aug →
mirage13–110.0025%31 Aug →
ancient13–60.0024%31 Aug →
office10–13-0.0532%30 Aug →
office7–9-0.0329%30 Aug →
office13–80.0120%30 Aug →
shelter8–1-0.020%26 Aug →
nuke12–120.0434%26 Aug →
ancient13–70.0338%25 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0633%25 Aug →
ancient13–110.0115%17 Aug →
office10–13-0.0929%14 Aug →
train13–9-0.0423%14 Aug →
inferno19–17-0.0810%13 Aug →
dust213–100.0424%13 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0234%13 Aug →
anubis13–60.0233%12 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0228%12 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0635%11 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0917%6 Aug →
ancient13–30.0524%6 Aug →
office12–12-0.0033%3 Aug →
office8–13-0.0044%3 Aug →
nuke13–90.0224%23 Jul →
cache16–120.0233%23 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0336%23 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0123%23 Jul →
office11–13-0.146%22 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0633%22 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0621%21 Jul →
nuke6–130.0317%21 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0339%21 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0933%20 Jul →
dust25–13-0.1436%18 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0421%18 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0810%16 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0522%16 Jul →
ancient13–80.1128%15 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0138%14 Jul →
cache12–16-0.0139%14 Jul →
dust29–13-0.040%13 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0015%13 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.