KelRoy

KelRoy — CS2 Stats

AU76561198319705752[U:1:359440024]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

681Tracked matches37%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,121Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,235Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2677 of 261574 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,033 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 681 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,235 +3,236 1 Aug – 26 Oct · 33 days played
24,88428,330peak 28,3301 Aug26 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,033 +0 1 Sept – 26 Oct · 7 observations
1,0331,033peak 1,0331 Sept26 Oct
28,330Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,033Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,033
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 18 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 95 below peak (28,330)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,236 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,765 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches118−17
Win rate0%67%−67pp
K/D0.281.03−0.75
Headshot %60%54%+6pp

Measured 15 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; previous 16 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate42.7%43.8%44.8%2.1% short
Shot accuracy8.6%12.0%12.4%3.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.111.021.03above
Match win rate39.4%44.7%45.2%5.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKelRoyFACEITLevel 5 · 1,033 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER28,235 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,033csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning69
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–59Last 10041%Win rateLLWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 482ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.8
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch2.8

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time441ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 455ms → last ⅓ avg 441ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−6.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 10–13 · mirage, 9 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 14 Aug →
281msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · cache, 27 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 19cacheWeakest map · 9% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3113–1842%0.03
anubisA1911–858%0.03
ancientC188–1044%0.04
nukeB137–654%0.06
cacheD111–109%0.02
mirageD61–517%0.04
inferno—20–20%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

25,059Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
1,375Matches
39.4%Match win rate
42.7%Headshot %
8.6%Shot accuracy
2,751MVPs
480Hours (in match)
1,733Bombs planted
315Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,956dust2
1,126nuke
233inferno
186train
72vertigo
35office
15safehouse
11italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

137Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
80.3ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24250%1.1116.6
Mirage3743%0.9214.4
Nuke2370%1.1616.6
Ancient1145%0.9215.8
Train862%1.0816.1
Anubis850%0.8717.1
Overpass60%0.8313.8
Inferno250%1.0712.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
446msReaction time
61.2%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
11.26HE damage / grenade
6.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.4873% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0119%22 Sept →
anubis7–130.0128%22 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0333%22 Sept →
anubis13–100.0720%19 Sept →
dust29–130.0116%18 Sept →
anubis13–70.0719%18 Sept →
dust213–110.0119%18 Sept →
dust213–60.0417%18 Sept →
dust29–13-0.049%18 Sept →
cache16–140.0317%17 Sept →
anubis10–130.0219%17 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0317%16 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0515%14 Sept →
nuke13–100.0618%14 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.048%14 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.029%14 Sept →
nuke6–130.0519%13 Sept →
nuke9–130.0622%8 Sept →
nuke13–80.1013%8 Sept →
ancient11–130.0823%8 Sept →
anubis4–130.1012%8 Sept →
dust213–80.0010%8 Sept →
nuke6–130.0230%8 Sept →
ancient13–20.1725%8 Sept →
dust28–130.0024%8 Sept →
cache10–130.027%7 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0216%7 Sept →
ancient8–130.0317%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.1019%6 Sept →
cache7–13-0.048%4 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0217%4 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0125%4 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0014%4 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0014%4 Sept →
dust210–130.0621%4 Sept →
anubis13–110.0022%3 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0322%2 Sept →
dust213–70.0931%2 Sept →
nuke13–20.0715%2 Sept →
dust29–130.0421%2 Sept →
ancient13–10.038%2 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0621%1 Sept →
anubis13–70.0515%30 Aug →
dust25–130.0125%30 Aug →
ancient13–110.0111%30 Aug →
ancient2–130.0021%30 Aug →
cache7–130.0423%30 Aug →
dust213–110.0723%29 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.059%29 Aug →
mirage11–130.0714%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0423%29 Aug →
nuke16–140.0413%29 Aug →
ancient6–130.009%28 Aug →
anubis13–110.0422%28 Aug →
anubis13–30.0528%28 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0910%28 Aug →
ancient13–80.0517%28 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0424%27 Aug →
nuke13–70.1115%27 Aug →
anubis13–100.0313%26 Aug →
dust27–130.0617%26 Aug →
nuke13–50.1030%26 Aug →
ancient4–130.0219%26 Aug →
cache5–130.0423%24 Aug →
ancient13–60.0713%24 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0220%24 Aug →
dust213–100.0115%23 Aug →
dust213–80.1027%23 Aug →
nuke11–130.1633%22 Aug →
dust29–130.0931%22 Aug →
dust213–80.1120%22 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0217%22 Aug →
anubis12–160.0526%22 Aug →
mirage13–110.0317%21 Aug →
ancient13–100.0830%21 Aug →
cache9–130.0719%21 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0127%16 Aug →
dust213–100.1317%16 Aug →
nuke4–130.0341%14 Aug →
dust28–130.0419%14 Aug →
dust213–50.0416%14 Aug →
ancient10–130.0636%14 Aug →
mirage6–130.0425%13 Aug →
dust211–130.0932%13 Aug →
anubis13–80.0922%11 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0118%10 Aug →
ancient8–130.0415%10 Aug →
mirage10–130.1824%9 Aug →
dust213–60.0026%9 Aug →
cache13–160.0831%9 Aug →
cache4–130.0427%8 Aug →
anubis13–100.0317%8 Aug →
ancient13–60.0525%8 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0425%8 Aug →
anubis13–110.0612%8 Aug →
nuke13–100.0521%8 Aug →
dust211–130.0629%7 Aug →
dust213–70.0423%7 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0515%5 Aug →
dust213–80.0925%1 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.