Nette

Nette — CS2 Stats

76561198317953074[U:1:357687346]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,607Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,752Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 +1,808 11 Oct – 28 Oct · 18 days played
12,02815,103peak 15,10311 Oct28 Oct
15,103Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-10-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 104 below peak (15,103)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.8%42.7%43.8%4.0% short
Shot accuracy13.3%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.870.991.020.15 short
Match win rate42.6%43.9%44.7%2.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNetteFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning58
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateWWLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −46ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility5.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time547ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 28 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 11 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 14 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 38% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C249–1538%-0.00
mirageA2012–860%0.01
infernoA159–660%-0.00
anubisC135–838%-0.02
nukeA116–555%0.02
ancientA106–460%0.02
cacheS75–271%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

148,863Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
8,793Matches
42.6%Match win rate
39.8%Headshot %
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
19,753MVPs
3,752Hours (in match)
5,849Bombs planted
1,342Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4759,211
FAMAS4,574
MP94,451
MP74,364
MAC-103,935
P903,432

Lifetime map wins

15,303dust2
10,775inferno
3,888office
2,896vertigo
2,766nuke
1,173train
652cbble
118italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

148Matches
50%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
82.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3047%0.8314.0
Dust21747%0.8615.4
Inferno1030%0.8615.6
Anubis944%0.9216.4
Ancient862%0.7612.4
Vertigo367%1.5121.3
Nuke10%0.7414.0
Overpass1100%1.1919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
542msReaction time
60.3%T opening success
38.1%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
11.76HE damage / grenade
4.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.0532% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0519%28 Oct →
inferno13–50.0112%28 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0416%28 Oct →
inferno5–130.0117%28 Oct →
ancient13–80.0820%28 Oct →
mirage13–20.1820%28 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0017%28 Oct →
cache16–140.0714%28 Oct →
dust210–130.0214%28 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0511%28 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.009%28 Oct →
nuke13–60.0427%28 Oct →
dust213–110.0514%28 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.069%28 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0615%28 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0116%27 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0310%27 Oct →
dust28–130.0115%27 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.089%26 Oct →
anubis13–90.0211%26 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0223%26 Oct →
dust28–13-0.1015%26 Oct →
inferno12–120.0114%26 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0315%25 Oct →
dust213–70.0524%24 Oct →
cache13–00.000%24 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0314%24 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0417%23 Oct →
dust213–110.0516%23 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0015%23 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0617%23 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0318%23 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0518%23 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0710%23 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0115%22 Oct →
nuke6–130.0121%22 Oct →
ancient13–100.0013%22 Oct →
ancient13–50.0928%22 Oct →
mirage13–110.0520%22 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0714%22 Oct →
inferno13–50.0223%22 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0727%21 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.039%20 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0224%20 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0115%20 Oct →
inferno13–80.0516%20 Oct →
cache13–60.0921%19 Oct →
mirage13–80.0221%19 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0123%19 Oct →
ancient13–80.0211%19 Oct →
dust213–30.029%19 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.079%19 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0318%19 Oct →
mirage13–10.019%19 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0714%18 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0018%18 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0317%18 Oct →
dust213–90.0213%18 Oct →
ancient11–130.0211%17 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.069%17 Oct →
nuke13–110.0622%17 Oct →
ancient13–60.0221%17 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0313%17 Oct →
anubis8–130.0317%16 Oct →
nuke13–90.0320%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0818%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0712%16 Oct →
inferno13–50.0714%16 Oct →
mirage13–40.049%15 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0217%15 Oct →
mirage13–70.059%15 Oct →
mirage8–130.1213%15 Oct →
dust211–130.0118%15 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0025%15 Oct →
anubis13–110.0222%15 Oct →
inferno13–70.0518%15 Oct →
cache10–130.019%15 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0216%15 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0119%15 Oct →
dust27–130.0010%15 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0917%15 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0710%14 Oct →
dust213–40.0318%14 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0715%14 Oct →
mirage13–40.0011%14 Oct →
dust215–150.0419%14 Oct →
dust214–160.0314%14 Oct →
nuke7–130.0415%14 Oct →
dust211–130.0813%13 Oct →
cache13–00.020%13 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0124%13 Oct →
nuke16–140.0823%13 Oct →
mirage13–80.0321%13 Oct →
inferno13–30.0518%12 Oct →
mirage10–130.0324%12 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0119%12 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.065%11 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0714%11 Oct →
ancient13–80.0626%11 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0133%11 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.