rockingandryaning

rockingandryaning — CS2 Stats

AF76561198317812513[U:1:357546785]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

919Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,563Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,479Blue band · top ~36.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,479 -1,900 8 Sept – 14 Nov · 41 days played
11,60316,542peak 16,5428 Sept14 Nov
17,116Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,063 below peak (16,542)
  • +1,130 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,521 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches10——
Win rate70%——
K/D1.06——
Headshot %56%——

Measured 6 Nov 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate49.1%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy13.2%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.860.980.990.13 short
Match win rate43.3%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrockingandryaningFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,479 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning66
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT44–48–8Last 10044%Win rateWWLWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.7
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels7.9
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time562ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 16 Oct →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 23 Oct →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 11 Nov →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 25 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
3–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 15infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3115–1648%0.02
dust2D206–1430%0.01
anubisA159–660%0.01
nukeA127–558%0.02
ancientB84–450%0.00
cacheD82–625%0.04
infernoD51–420%-0.00
train—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,490Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
1,608Matches
43.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
49.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
2,645MVPs
578Hours (in match)
1,596Bombs planted
371Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,224dust2
878inferno
833train
577nuke
325vertigo
18cbble
4office
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
38%Win rate
0.60Avg K/D
—ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
559msReaction time
67.8%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
5.54HE damage / grenade
11.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0423%14 Nov →
mirage13–60.0914%11 Nov →
dust211–130.0724%11 Nov →
anubis13–9-0.0121%11 Nov →
anubis13–60.0427%10 Nov →
mirage13–50.0621%10 Nov →
ancient13–6-0.0223%9 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0226%7 Nov →
inferno13–10-0.0017%7 Nov →
nuke13–100.0219%5 Nov →
inferno15–150.0317%5 Nov →
cache8–130.0527%4 Nov →
anubis12–160.0012%3 Nov →
nuke11–130.0115%2 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0216%2 Nov →
cache13–60.0821%29 Oct →
anubis13–60.0215%29 Oct →
nuke13–110.0316%29 Oct →
mirage13–30.0614%29 Oct →
dust28–130.0026%28 Oct →
mirage11–130.0320%26 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0117%26 Oct →
anubis13–40.007%26 Oct →
mirage13–20.0432%25 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0424%25 Oct →
nuke13–50.0720%25 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0318%25 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0223%24 Oct →
mirage3–120.0018%23 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0145%23 Oct →
ancient13–60.0215%23 Oct →
dust215–150.0626%22 Oct →
mirage13–50.1129%22 Oct →
cache8–130.0816%19 Oct →
dust211–130.0115%19 Oct →
dust29–130.0532%18 Oct →
mirage13–100.0122%17 Oct →
mirage10–130.0710%16 Oct →
mirage13–40.2023%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0320%16 Oct →
nuke13–90.0444%15 Oct →
dust213–40.0515%14 Oct →
nuke4–130.0126%14 Oct →
mirage7–00.0329%14 Oct →
cache13–60.0827%11 Oct →
train4–13-0.0522%11 Oct →
dust213–160.0343%10 Oct →
mirage6–00.0143%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0121%10 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0120%10 Oct →
anubis6–130.0021%8 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0421%8 Oct →
anubis13–60.0421%6 Oct →
dust214–160.0129%6 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0429%3 Oct →
mirage15–150.0122%3 Oct →
mirage6–130.0230%3 Oct →
mirage13–90.0323%3 Oct →
mirage6–130.0213%1 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0214%30 Sept →
inferno6–130.0114%30 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0819%30 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0415%29 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0318%29 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0420%28 Sept →
nuke13–80.0631%28 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0310%27 Sept →
ancient8–130.0921%27 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0018%18 Sept →
nuke13–20.0310%17 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0114%17 Sept →
mirage12–120.0517%16 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0110%16 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0615%16 Sept →
anubis12–160.0816%15 Sept →
dust213–70.0123%15 Sept →
mirage3–0-0.070%15 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0122%15 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0218%14 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0512%14 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0122%13 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0323%13 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0322%13 Sept →
anubis5–11-0.0912%13 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0223%13 Sept →
dust216–130.0022%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0024%12 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0325%12 Sept →
dust29–10.0621%12 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0026%12 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0427%12 Sept →
dust213–100.0513%12 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0216%12 Sept →
anubis13–60.0922%10 Sept →
cache12–120.0715%9 Sept →
anubis13–70.0723%9 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0016%9 Sept →
nuke5–130.0119%8 Sept →
anubis13–60.0515%8 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0422%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.