MITCHEL KRAMER

MITCHEL KRAMER — CS2 Stats

NL76561198313960442[U:1:353694714]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

449Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,743Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating29,180Top 1% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#976 of 220522 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 449 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 12 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,180 +13,120 12 Nov12 Sept · 32 days played
13,63129,227peak 29,22712 Nov12 Sept
29,375Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2025-11-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 47 below peak (29,227)
  • +11,597 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 820 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 11 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 11 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate46.8%48.3%51.0%4.2% short
Shot accuracy16.1%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.071.090.10 short
Match win rate44.6%46.9%48.4%3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMITCHEL KRAMERFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER29,180 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning36
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48511Last 10048%Win rateLWWWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.2
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch5.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning3.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time613ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 28 Dec
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 29 Jul
430msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 28 Jul
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB40192148%0.02
infernoA1810856%0.03
nukeD102820%0.04
anubisS96367%0.01
cacheA95456%-0.02
dust2S64267%0.01
overpassC52340%0.07
ancient3030%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

77,922Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
3,759Matches
44.6%Match win rate
46.8%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
12,687MVPs
1,743Hours (in match)
2,611Bombs planted
2,485Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,201
AWP6,966
SG 5531,815
Knife1,401
P2501,186

Lifetime map wins

8,714inferno
4,540dust2
2,996train
2,452nuke
2,073vertigo
139cbble
100office
68lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

842Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
81.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1662%1.4916.8
Dust21258%1.3016.3
Anubis757%1.2220.4
Ancient650%1.3614.2
Inferno667%1.3220.3
Vertigo667%1.1118.5
Nuke475%1.2820.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
90.6%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
618msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
26.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
12.71HE damage / grenade
5.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9579% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.1121%2 Aug
anubis9–3-0.090%2 Aug
mirage13–00.0031%2 Aug
inferno7–00.0413%2 Aug
dust213–1-0.016%2 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0211%1 Aug
ancient8–13-0.064%1 Aug
anubis13–110.0025%29 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0236%29 Jul
mirage7–130.0221%29 Jul
cache13–50.0132%29 Jul
anubis13–90.0612%29 Jul
mirage13–100.0214%28 Jul
ancient11–130.0821%28 Jul
cache13–0-0.028%28 Jul
inferno13–40.0826%28 Jul
cache13–10-0.0321%19 Jul
inferno13–90.0413%19 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0414%19 Jul
mirage0–13-0.040%19 Jul
cache13–3-0.0520%18 Jul
dust213–90.0330%18 Jul
mirage13–40.0122%18 Jul
cache5–13-0.0429%18 Jul
mirage13–40.0621%18 Jul
dust213–70.0314%18 Jul
inferno13–30.0014%18 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0130%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0315%16 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0329%16 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0117%15 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0225%15 Jul
anubis13–60.0523%15 Jul
cache13–40.0818%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0325%15 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0619%15 Jul
mirage13–10.0719%15 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0316%14 Jul
anubis13–110.1317%14 Jul
inferno13–80.0724%14 Jul
mirage8–130.0122%30 Jun
cache5–13-0.090%30 Jun
overpass13–110.1223%27 Jun
mirage13–90.0523%27 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0110%27 Jun
mirage14–160.0534%27 Jun
anubis7–130.0313%25 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0112%25 Jun
mirage13–110.0225%25 Jun
nuke13–50.0822%19 Jun
cache4–13-0.0114%13 Jun
inferno8–130.0810%11 Jun
nuke7–130.0421%20 May
ancient3–130.0523%17 Apr
mirage13–60.2022%16 Apr
nuke6–130.0122%16 Apr
inferno8–130.0329%6 Apr
overpass7–130.0227%4 Apr
mirage13–90.1023%2 Apr
inferno13–60.0322%2 Apr
mirage13–70.1318%2 Apr
mirage13–70.0121%29 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0220%27 Mar
mirage7–130.0223%27 Mar
nuke8–130.0516%13 Mar
dust26–13-0.0522%12 Mar
mirage9–130.0521%11 Mar
overpass11–130.0625%11 Mar
mirage9–130.0131%11 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0212%11 Mar
dust26–130.0518%8 Mar
nuke9–130.0118%8 Mar
mirage13–160.0316%8 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0115%5 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0416%5 Mar
inferno7–130.0321%4 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0116%4 Mar
mirage11–130.0413%4 Mar
nuke0–90.0012%4 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0619%3 Mar
inferno13–70.0419%3 Mar
mirage13–60.0426%3 Mar
dust213–100.0229%3 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0016%2 Mar
inferno13–50.0623%2 Mar
mirage13–100.0433%1 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0214%1 Mar
mirage4–130.0228%28 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0313%14 Feb
inferno7–130.0724%31 Jan
nuke8–130.0130%31 Jan
mirage15–15-0.0610%25 Jan
mirage13–30.0929%25 Jan
inferno13–50.0735%25 Jan
overpass9–130.0525%19 Jan
overpass13–100.1119%16 Jan
nuke13–20.2428%28 Dec
mirage13–160.0724%28 Dec
mirage2–130.0233%15 Nov
mirage13–110.0717%12 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →