RediXD

RediXD — CS2 Stats

PL76561198313581049[U:1:353315321]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

867Tracked matches41%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,620Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,230Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#83196 of 219977 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,578 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 9 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,230 -3,370 9 Feb10 Sept · 25 days played
18,89724,093peak 24,0939 Feb10 Sept
24,093Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,578Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-02-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,578
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 173 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,863 below peak (24,093)
  • -394 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 770 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.6%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy3.9%13.0%13.2%9.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.971.061.070.10 short
Match win rate53.8%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRediXDFACEITLevel 8 · 1,578 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,230 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,578csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning40
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36577Last 10036%Win rateLLWWLWWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 713ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 673ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 699ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility5.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 682ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact1.9

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time677ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 677ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+6.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.35Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 5 Mar
56%Best headshot accuracy · 3–5 · nuke, 14 May
445msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · mirage, 8 May
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 5 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
314In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 18anubisWeakest map · 13% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1810856%-0.02
nukeC1771041%0.04
mirageD1641225%-0.03
anubisD1521313%-0.01
infernoC125742%0.00
dust2D82625%-0.01
overpassD82625%0.01
cache43175%-0.02
office110100%-0.00
warden1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,159Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
1,907Matches
53.8%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 8 players
47.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3.9%Shot accuracy
5,445MVPs
922Hours (in match)
3,664Bombs planted
518Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,536
AWP3,212
MP91,369
SSG 081,109
MAC-101,048
Knife1,030

Lifetime map wins

3,793nuke
2,895inferno
1,997dust2
1,464vertigo
438train
27office
16lake
5ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,068Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
77.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage29851%1.0414.9
Anubis17345%1.0014.9
Inferno12956%1.0115.1
Dust212847%0.9513.8
Ancient12750%1.0514.8
Nuke7846%1.1115.6
Vertigo6359%1.1216.1
Train2548%1.1316.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
682msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
30.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
6.07HE damage / grenade
8.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8283% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.1027%10 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0423%5 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0135%4 Sept
mirage13–20.0220%31 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0224%22 Aug
nuke13–70.0421%12 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0413%11 Aug
mirage15–150.0017%14 Jul
nuke8–130.0113%14 Jul
nuke7–130.0110%14 Jul
cache9–13-0.0420%13 Jul
nuke11–130.0520%12 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0013%7 Jul
anubis8–130.0217%18 May
cache13–70.0522%18 May
mirage12–9-0.0326%18 May
nuke12–120.0639%18 May
cache13–11-0.0315%17 May
mirage3–130.0118%17 May
nuke3–5-0.0456%14 May
nuke3–130.0027%13 May
anubis15–150.0219%13 May
anubis1–6-0.0338%13 May
inferno13–80.1026%13 May
inferno0–13-0.0331%10 May
inferno4–130.0142%9 May
dust22–13-0.1133%9 May
cache13–11-0.0615%9 May
mirage4–13-0.0913%8 May
dust213–8-0.0715%26 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0911%26 Apr
ancient3–130.0422%26 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0121%17 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0324%16 Apr
inferno13–70.0319%16 Apr
overpass4–130.0523%13 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0914%13 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0114%12 Apr
ancient13–110.0820%12 Apr
inferno7–13-0.114%9 Apr
dust27–13-0.0329%7 Apr
anubis11–130.0525%5 Apr
inferno13–30.1026%3 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0616%3 Apr
nuke8–130.0123%3 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0831%22 Mar
office13–6-0.0032%18 Mar
inferno12–12-0.0217%17 Mar
dust28–130.0223%15 Mar
nuke9–130.0627%13 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0418%11 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0417%10 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0719%10 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0412%9 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0510%8 Mar
ancient10–13-0.075%8 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0738%8 Mar
anubis7–130.0321%8 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0217%8 Mar
overpass3–130.0116%8 Mar
anubis12–120.0822%5 Mar
nuke13–00.3522%5 Mar
dust212–120.0516%5 Mar
overpass13–80.0417%4 Mar
nuke13–90.0317%4 Mar
mirage12–120.0516%4 Mar
inferno13–60.058%2 Mar
warden6–13-0.0329%2 Mar
overpass9–130.0313%2 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0319%2 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0316%26 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0620%26 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0220%26 Feb
mirage11–13-0.076%26 Feb
anubis4–13-0.094%26 Feb
anubis13–70.0016%26 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0416%26 Feb
dust211–130.0223%25 Feb
ancient13–60.0222%25 Feb
nuke13–20.0123%25 Feb
nuke13–100.1229%25 Feb
dust217–19-0.0116%25 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0219%25 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0827%25 Feb
ancient10–130.0216%24 Feb
dust213–70.0110%24 Feb
ancient13–90.0214%23 Feb
inferno13–60.0815%23 Feb
overpass13–60.0522%22 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0713%22 Feb
ancient11–130.0213%19 Feb
ancient13–6-0.056%16 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0515%12 Feb
anubis13–100.0525%12 Feb
overpass12–16-0.0614%12 Feb
ancient13–100.0419%11 Feb
nuke13–80.0423%10 Feb
mirage14–160.0110%10 Feb
overpass12–160.0110%9 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0213%9 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →