zu

zu — CS2 Stats

PL76561198311622527[U:1:351356799]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

672Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,267Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,535Blue band · top ~46.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 902 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Aug 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 5 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,535 -4,849 5 May23 Aug · 34 days played
11,53516,384peak 16,3845 May23 Aug
16,384Peak Premier in tracked matches
902Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-05-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 902
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 149 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,849 below peak (16,384)
  • -3,358 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,465 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate34.1%43.8%44.9%10.8% short
Shot accuracy11.7%12.0%12.4%0.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.021.040.08 short
Match win rate44.8%44.7%45.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzuFACEITLevel 5 · 902 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,535 · Blue bandPEAK ELO902csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning50
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44515Last 10044%Win rateWLWWLWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility5.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time580ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy12.6%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 3 Jul
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · overpass, 28 Jun
430msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 21 May
13–2Biggest win · vertigo, 1 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2281436%-0.01
nukeD1551033%-0.03
anubisB136746%-0.04
ancientB126650%-0.01
cacheB105550%-0.01
infernoD102820%-0.03
dust2A95456%-0.02
overpassS75271%-0.01
vertigo220100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,143Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
3,598Matches
44.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
34.1%Headshot %
11.7%Shot accuracy
9,177MVPs
1,195Hours (in match)
4,641Bombs planted
830Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,924inferno
3,083dust2
1,923nuke
1,532cbble
1,202vertigo
481train
213lake
205office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

178Matches
52%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
78.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6557%1.0114.0
Anubis2450%0.8713.3
Nuke1464%1.0612.9
Inferno1155%0.8515.0
Vertigo978%1.3115.3
Ancient838%0.9015.4
Dust2875%0.8214.4
Cache743%0.8215.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.4%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
577msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
8.22HE damage / grenade
12.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.3604% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1519% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–5-0.0219%10 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0816%9 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0615%9 Sept
nuke13–50.0314%1 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0317%31 Aug
vertigo13–70.0819%25 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0013%23 Aug
nuke10–13-0.039%21 Aug
mirage15–150.014%20 Aug
nuke11–13-0.073%20 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0012%19 Aug
cache10–13-0.0713%19 Aug
inferno9–130.0314%18 Aug
cache16–130.0413%17 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0415%17 Aug
cache7–130.016%15 Aug
ancient13–70.047%15 Aug
nuke6–13-0.119%14 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0510%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0517%13 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0024%13 Aug
mirage15–150.0114%12 Aug
dust213–8-0.0112%12 Aug
cache13–50.0610%12 Aug
anubis9–13-0.056%12 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0210%11 Aug
cache13–70.0013%11 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0416%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0215%9 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0210%9 Aug
nuke11–13-0.089%8 Aug
cache8–13-0.0214%6 Aug
anubis13–80.0317%6 Aug
cache7–13-0.0023%6 Aug
inferno15–150.0214%4 Aug
ancient13–90.0715%4 Aug
dust210–130.0614%1 Aug
vertigo13–20.0816%1 Aug
cache16–140.0222%24 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0710%24 Jul
cache13–11-0.0614%24 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0520%23 Jul
cache15–15-0.0710%23 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0410%10 Jul
inferno13–80.0112%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.1012%9 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0920%9 Jul
nuke3–9-0.0719%6 Jul
mirage13–110.059%6 Jul
ancient6–13-0.108%6 Jul
mirage14–160.0116%3 Jul
overpass13–3-0.0410%3 Jul
ancient13–40.1016%3 Jul
overpass9–13-0.069%29 Jun
overpass6–13-0.026%29 Jun
mirage13–70.0622%29 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0317%28 Jun
ancient13–80.0025%28 Jun
overpass13–20.0445%28 Jun
mirage9–130.0113%28 Jun
mirage13–80.0521%28 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0617%28 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0623%28 Jun
dust211–13-0.0412%27 Jun
dust213–8-0.068%27 Jun
inferno16–140.007%26 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0610%23 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0814%20 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0918%17 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0217%10 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0423%8 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0417%8 Jun
mirage5–13-0.065%31 May
ancient13–100.0312%30 May
anubis4–13-0.0713%30 May
nuke13–80.0115%23 May
inferno2–13-0.083%23 May
dust23–13-0.039%23 May
mirage7–13-0.069%22 May
nuke13–5-0.0311%22 May
overpass13–6-0.0120%22 May
nuke9–130.0217%21 May
ancient13–5-0.0218%21 May
nuke8–130.0125%19 May
dust210–13-0.0417%18 May
anubis3–13-0.0616%17 May
overpass13–80.0823%17 May
dust213–6-0.0213%17 May
nuke9–6-0.0613%17 May
inferno4–9-0.0814%17 May
mirage9–130.0514%17 May
dust213–90.0015%16 May
mirage13–60.0420%16 May
nuke13–90.0617%12 May
nuke13–16-0.0112%10 May
anubis12–16-0.0416%10 May
mirage15–150.0614%9 May
inferno10–13-0.0110%6 May
ancient11–13-0.0512%6 May
overpass16–12-0.0511%5 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →