Slava Ukraini!

Slava Ukraini! — CS2 Stats

DE76561198308610070[U:1:348344342]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,144Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,108Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,878Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88034 of 259057 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (29 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,878 +201 18 Apr – 2 Oct · 24 days played
15,09020,105peak 20,10518 Apr2 Oct
20,111Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-04-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 227 below peak (20,105)
  • +4,788 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 122 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate36.0%42.7%43.8%7.8% short
Shot accuracy12.0%11.2%12.0%meets
Kill/death ratio1.040.991.02meets
Match win rate42.7%43.9%44.7%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSlava Ukraini!FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,878 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning51
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–53–6Last 10041%Win rateLLWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time567ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy13.6%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 13.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–7 · poseidon, 17 Sept →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · ancient, 8 May →
375msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · vertigo, 20 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 27 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2210–1245%-0.01
infernoS1510–567%0.00
anubisD153–1220%0.01
mirageB136–746%-0.01
cacheD134–931%-0.00
overpassD62–433%0.00
vertigo—31–233%-0.09
debris—32–167%-0.05
dust2—31–233%-0.01
fachwerk—20–20%-0.04
nuke—10–10%-0.07
eldorado—10–10%-0.07
poseidon—11–0100%0.18
boulder—10–10%-0.02
shelter—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,559Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,147Matches
42.7%Match win rate
36.0%Headshot %
12.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
6,945MVPs
1,054Hours (in match)
3,002Bombs planted
690Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,288
AWP5,689
SG 5531,432
Knife1,350
AUG1,213

Lifetime map wins

4,400inferno
3,325vertigo
1,936dust2
1,426nuke
802train
318cbble
179office
139lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

176Matches
52%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
79.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1850%1.0515.7
Ancient1759%0.9914.9
Anubis1650%0.9016.1
Mirage633%0.9719.7
Train367%0.9015.0
Dust220%0.7513.5
Nuke1100%1.4014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
569msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
34.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
10.24HE damage / grenade
6.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2412% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.472% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo1–9-0.245%20 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0218%2 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0321%2 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.037%26 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0710%24 Sept →
mirage13–40.0118%23 Sept →
debris9–70.0817%17 Sept →
eldorado3–9-0.0711%17 Sept →
poseidon9–70.1821%17 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.066%13 Sept →
mirage13–80.0224%13 Sept →
ancient13–70.0412%13 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.067%9 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0623%8 Sept →
ancient4–130.0026%8 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0315%8 Sept →
inferno13–30.0618%8 Sept →
anubis13–80.0311%25 Aug →
fachwerk8–13-0.028%26 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0320%26 Jul →
boulder6–13-0.0214%25 Jul →
fachwerk8–13-0.059%25 Jul →
shelter13–7-0.0311%25 Jul →
debris9–50.1220%25 Jul →
debris0–9-0.356%25 Jul →
inferno9–60.078%25 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.037%25 Jul →
ancient16–140.0314%25 Jul →
anubis7–130.0117%11 Jul →
inferno13–100.0211%11 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.066%11 Jul →
cache6–13-0.1217%10 Jul →
inferno13–50.0411%10 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0126%10 Jul →
inferno13–110.009%9 Jul →
anubis13–40.0920%9 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0816%5 Jul →
overpass5–13-0.0310%5 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0114%5 Jul →
dust215–15-0.039%1 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.029%27 Jun →
ancient13–20.0428%27 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.015%27 Jun →
ancient13–00.044%27 Jun →
inferno13–40.045%27 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.018%27 Jun →
overpass14–16-0.0416%27 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.0211%26 Jun →
ancient10–130.0419%26 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.059%24 Jun →
overpass13–100.0021%24 Jun →
anubis11–130.039%24 Jun →
dust213–70.0419%24 Jun →
anubis16–140.0411%24 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0411%17 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0422%17 Jun →
anubis15–150.0318%15 Jun →
dust214–16-0.0526%15 Jun →
mirage13–80.0215%15 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0113%11 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0110%11 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.076%7 Jun →
ancient16–13-0.027%7 Jun →
overpass13–30.048%7 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.0817%7 Jun →
overpass10–130.0716%7 Jun →
vertigo13–60.048%6 Jun →
ancient13–50.0317%6 Jun →
mirage9–130.0319%6 Jun →
ancient11–130.0219%6 Jun →
mirage13–70.0316%6 Jun →
vertigo10–13-0.0615%6 Jun →
cache12–120.019%6 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.069%5 Jun →
anubis11–130.0317%2 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.096%2 Jun →
cache8–130.0128%29 May →
ancient6–13-0.0615%28 May →
mirage13–70.0321%27 May →
cache13–40.0519%27 May →
inferno13–110.0117%17 May →
anubis6–130.0519%17 May →
cache12–120.0725%16 May →
cache11–13-0.0319%16 May →
inferno13–90.0313%16 May →
mirage7–13-0.0621%8 May →
ancient7–13-0.0129%8 May →
cache13–9-0.0210%8 May →
cache10–13-0.0022%2 May →
cache12–120.0113%2 May →
cache7–13-0.0310%30 Apr →
cache13–40.1119%30 Apr →
cache13–10-0.0516%30 Apr →
mirage10–130.0210%21 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.049%21 Apr →
inferno13–70.0016%21 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.0113%21 Apr →
anubis7–130.0415%20 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0422%20 Apr →
overpass15–15-0.0215%18 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.