LW

LW — CS2 Stats

DE76561197962790272[U:1:2524544]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,325Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,419Purple band · top ~26.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,348 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,419 +420 18 Aug – 30 Oct · 12 days played
14,99917,086peak 17,08618 Aug30 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,348 +0 4 Sept – 24 Sept · 2 observations
1,3481,348peak 1,3484 Sept24 Sept
17,086Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,348Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-08-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,348
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 3 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,667 below peak (17,086)
  • -1,337 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,581 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLWFACEITLevel 8 · 1,348 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER15,419 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,348csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning74
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–45Last 10055%Win rateLLLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −75ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility3.7
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 79% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 79% on T to 49% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning7.4
Utility3.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time556ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 26 Oct →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 8 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 26 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13anubisWeakest map · 50% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2614–1254%-0.00
mirageA1811–761%0.01
anubisB147–750%-0.01
nukeB137–654%0.04
infernoA138–562%0.00
dust2B105–550%-0.02
cache—32–167%-0.00
office—10–10%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%-0.03
train—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,118Matches
49%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
77.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26551%1.0215.8
Dust220050%0.9915.4
Inferno16645%0.9814.8
Ancient15552%0.9914.9
Anubis12743%0.9115.3
Nuke10657%1.0416.9
Cache3557%1.0115.7
Overpass2638%0.9814.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
560msReaction time
79.2%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
4.57HE damage / grenade
3.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4936 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0021%30 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0311%29 Oct →
mirage5–130.0533%29 Oct →
office3–130.0121%29 Oct →
dust213–60.0019%28 Oct →
ancient16–130.0717%28 Oct →
nuke4–130.0225%27 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0118%26 Oct →
ancient13–80.0218%26 Oct →
mirage13–00.1812%26 Oct →
nuke9–130.0637%26 Oct →
mirage13–110.0312%26 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0425%25 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0826%24 Oct →
nuke13–80.0818%20 Oct →
nuke13–50.1331%20 Oct →
nuke6–130.0020%20 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0711%18 Oct →
anubis13–80.0629%17 Oct →
ancient11–130.0224%17 Oct →
mirage8–130.0422%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0913%16 Oct →
ancient13–90.0524%15 Oct →
ancient13–50.0720%15 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0321%13 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0221%8 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0415%8 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0118%5 Oct →
anubis13–160.0714%4 Oct →
mirage13–70.0415%4 Oct →
inferno11–130.0020%2 Oct →
mirage13–60.0429%2 Oct →
anubis16–12-0.0017%1 Oct →
nuke11–130.0227%30 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0520%29 Sept →
dust213–70.0721%29 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0425%27 Sept →
ancient13–110.0021%27 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0517%26 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0527%26 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0314%24 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0721%23 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0415%23 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0519%23 Sept →
anubis13–110.0014%23 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0316%23 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0223%23 Sept →
nuke13–100.0829%22 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0631%22 Sept →
inferno16–140.0414%21 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0315%20 Sept →
anubis22–20-0.0517%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0716%19 Sept →
ancient7–130.0322%19 Sept →
inferno13–70.0719%19 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0015%18 Sept →
mirage3–130.0014%16 Sept →
inferno13–110.008%15 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.045%13 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0113%13 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0620%13 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.018%13 Sept →
ancient19–160.0130%13 Sept →
train8–130.0222%12 Sept →
ancient13–50.0823%12 Sept →
ancient13–10.0826%12 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0125%9 Sept →
ancient13–30.0917%9 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0124%8 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0439%8 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0221%8 Sept →
inferno13–50.0319%5 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0228%5 Sept →
inferno20–22-0.0222%1 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0417%1 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.1122%1 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0137%28 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0330%26 Aug →
dust213–90.0424%26 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0532%25 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0212%25 Aug →
inferno9–60.0930%25 Aug →
dust213–10-0.084%24 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0013%24 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0125%24 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0913%24 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0115%24 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0022%22 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0225%21 Aug →
nuke13–30.0724%21 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0123%21 Aug →
mirage13–40.0017%20 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0519%20 Aug →
cache13–30.0633%19 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0512%18 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0718%18 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0433%18 Aug →
anubis13–70.0420%17 Aug →
nuke13–70.0425%15 Aug →
mirage22–20-0.0134%14 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.