Fl-Orion

Fl-Orion — CS2 Stats

76561198308186319[U:1:347920591]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

614Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
782Hours in CS60Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,943Blue band · top ~34% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,943 +3,003 28 Sept – 17 Oct · 14 days played
10,57014,330peak 14,33028 Sept17 Oct
14,393Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-09-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 387 below peak (14,330)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,057 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,259), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate54.7%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy4.4%12.2%11.3%6.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.130.980.99above
Match win rate47.3%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFl-OrionFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,943 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning58
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateLWWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.8
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time499ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 506ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 13 Oct →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 16 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 11 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 50% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2211–1150%0.00
nukeA1710–759%0.02
mirageB179–853%0.01
cacheB158–753%0.00
infernoA95–456%0.01
ancientA95–456%-0.00
anubisS96–367%0.01
train—21–150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,853Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
1,108Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
54.7%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 3 players
4.4%Shot accuracy
2,460MVPs
373Hours (in match)
1,219Bombs planted
298Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,579dust2
1,655nuke
750inferno
579vertigo
340office
255train
30italy
13militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
44%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
78.5ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21937%1.0015.0
Mirage1331%0.9514.8
Nuke1145%0.9814.3
Anubis862%1.0416.1
Ancient743%1.1317.0
Cache757%0.9712.3
Inferno650%1.3816.8
Vertigo250%1.3014.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
485msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
5.60HE damage / grenade
11.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4447 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9145% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0719%17 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0123%17 Oct →
nuke13–70.1234%16 Oct →
mirage13–80.0629%16 Oct →
inferno11–130.0625%16 Oct →
dust28–130.0321%16 Oct →
nuke13–70.0820%16 Oct →
ancient13–30.0221%14 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0317%14 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0615%14 Oct →
dust213–20.0216%14 Oct →
anubis13–110.0432%13 Oct →
dust213–50.0821%13 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0129%13 Oct →
dust213–00.1817%13 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0814%13 Oct →
mirage13–80.0826%13 Oct →
ancient8–130.0518%13 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0518%12 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0613%12 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0613%12 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0617%12 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0814%11 Oct →
cache16–120.0219%11 Oct →
inferno13–110.0418%11 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0115%11 Oct →
nuke6–130.009%11 Oct →
mirage13–90.1024%11 Oct →
train6–13-0.0623%10 Oct →
dust28–13-0.038%10 Oct →
anubis13–60.0323%10 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0316%10 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0317%10 Oct →
nuke7–130.0018%10 Oct →
cache8–130.0213%10 Oct →
inferno13–30.0015%10 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0019%10 Oct →
dust213–30.067%10 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0523%9 Oct →
dust24–130.0217%9 Oct →
mirage2–130.0424%9 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0021%9 Oct →
dust20–10-0.0513%9 Oct →
ancient15–150.0715%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0512%9 Oct →
anubis13–60.0422%8 Oct →
mirage14–160.0314%8 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0116%8 Oct →
cache13–30.099%8 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0115%8 Oct →
dust213–4-0.066%8 Oct →
nuke13–40.0430%8 Oct →
ancient0–4-0.020%8 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0117%8 Oct →
cache10–13-0.076%8 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0221%8 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0018%8 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0216%7 Oct →
cache4–130.0321%7 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0322%7 Oct →
train13–90.0721%7 Oct →
cache13–70.0224%7 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0711%7 Oct →
inferno13–80.0227%7 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0115%7 Oct →
inferno13–10.1021%6 Oct →
nuke13–90.0029%6 Oct →
nuke13–40.0330%6 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0913%6 Oct →
anubis13–50.0719%6 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0319%6 Oct →
ancient13–60.0117%6 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0221%6 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0223%6 Oct →
anubis10–130.0217%6 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0116%5 Oct →
mirage8–130.0018%5 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0218%4 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0716%4 Oct →
mirage13–30.0823%4 Oct →
cache13–100.0214%4 Oct →
nuke6–130.0528%2 Oct →
mirage9–130.0224%2 Oct →
cache13–60.0122%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0121%2 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0616%2 Oct →
inferno13–80.0227%2 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0318%1 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0413%30 Sept →
dust210–13-0.058%30 Sept →
cache13–100.0518%30 Sept →
mirage13–90.0321%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0119%30 Sept →
nuke13–40.1516%29 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0715%29 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0413%29 Sept →
ancient13–80.0122%29 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0810%29 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0222%28 Sept →
nuke10–130.0314%28 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.