Nomadde HD

Nomadde HD — CS2 Stats

CX76561198306455169[U:1:346189441]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

980Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,069Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,530Purple band · top ~26.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,341 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,530 +531 11 May – 13 Oct · 29 days played
14,99918,173peak 18,17311 May13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,341 +0 3 Sept – 24 Sept · 3 observations
1,3411,341peak 1,3413 Sept24 Sept
18,294Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,341Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-05-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,341
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 10 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,643 below peak (18,173)
  • -2,159 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,470 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches5——
Win rate40%——
K/D1.11——
Headshot %56%——

Measured 21 Sep 2026 → 17 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate37.7%45.7%46.8%9.1% short
Shot accuracy12.8%12.7%13.0%meets
Kill/death ratio0.941.051.060.12 short
Match win rate45.2%45.7%46.3%1.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNomadde HDFACEITLevel 7 · 1,341 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,530 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,341csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning50
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–46–10Last 10044%Win rateLWWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.0
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time638ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 24 Jul →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 15 Jun →
445msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · cache, 27 Jun →
13–3Biggest win · cache, 24 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC3916–2341%-0.02
anubisB157–847%-0.02
infernoC135–838%-0.03
nukeA127–558%-0.02
ancientC83–538%-0.03
overpassA53–260%-0.01
dust2—42–250%-0.03
mirage—30–30%-0.07
train—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,402Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
3,411Matches
45.2%Match win rate
37.7%Headshot %
12.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
6,566MVPs
1,156Hours (in match)
2,491Bombs planted
712Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,379
AWP3,780
MP71,900
AUG1,541
SG 5531,277
SSG 081,261

Lifetime map wins

4,991vertigo
4,247inferno
3,840dust2
1,599nuke
960train
938cbble
215office
154lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

94Matches
60%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
62.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1060%0.9013.5
Ancient875%0.7711.1
Anubis667%0.679.5
Overpass650%0.7613.3
Vertigo580%0.8615.0
Dust2475%0.9212.0
Inferno367%0.6811.0
Mirage250%0.639.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
643msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
11.66HE damage / grenade
9.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4981 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3241% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0219%13 Oct →
nuke13–110.0331%11 Oct →
train13–8-0.0413%24 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.056%23 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0223%23 Aug →
dust210–130.0020%18 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0124%18 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0119%14 Aug →
nuke8–130.0011%14 Aug →
nuke16–12-0.0220%13 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.039%12 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0713%3 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0728%3 Aug →
inferno7–130.0417%1 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0314%1 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0617%31 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0318%31 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0615%31 Jul →
cache3–13-0.1022%31 Jul →
anubis16–140.0414%31 Jul →
dust213–60.0120%28 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.1110%27 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0518%27 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.028%26 Jul →
anubis10–130.0116%26 Jul →
anubis13–90.0016%24 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0114%24 Jul →
cache13–30.1524%24 Jul →
cache11–130.0624%24 Jul →
ancient13–100.0513%24 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0220%24 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.094%24 Jul →
inferno9–7-0.1213%24 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0815%20 Jul →
overpass12–12-0.0222%17 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0721%13 Jul →
cache9–130.0220%12 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0010%12 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0213%12 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0711%12 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.1312%12 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0615%12 Jul →
cache13–90.0312%10 Jul →
anubis13–50.0212%10 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0119%9 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0910%8 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0613%7 Jul →
cache13–110.0420%3 Jul →
cache13–30.0515%3 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0316%3 Jul →
overpass13–8-0.0314%1 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0115%1 Jul →
inferno13–80.0217%1 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0711%27 Jun →
cache13–60.0913%27 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0815%27 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0614%26 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0513%26 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0211%24 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0320%23 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0818%23 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0720%23 Jun →
cache13–80.0419%22 Jun →
cache13–90.0427%22 Jun →
cache13–11-0.0431%22 Jun →
cache2–13-0.0222%22 Jun →
inferno13–4-0.0515%16 Jun →
overpass6–10.0310%16 Jun →
anubis13–90.0413%16 Jun →
overpass2–13-0.0118%15 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0638%15 Jun →
anubis13–4-0.0310%15 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0923%5 Jun →
cache4–13-0.0127%5 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0315%5 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0724%4 Jun →
cache9–13-0.0532%4 Jun →
anubis13–5-0.0016%3 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0918%1 Jun →
nuke16–140.0520%29 May →
cache13–7-0.0511%28 May →
anubis11–13-0.0417%24 May →
inferno15–15-0.028%24 May →
cache5–13-0.0225%21 May →
ancient13–11-0.0212%21 May →
cache9–13-0.0427%20 May →
cache12–12-0.0428%19 May →
cache6–130.0320%18 May →
cache13–3-0.0033%18 May →
cache12–12-0.0619%18 May →
nuke13–9-0.0021%14 May →
cache12–12-0.0427%13 May →
cache13–7-0.0130%13 May →
cache13–90.0317%13 May →
cache12–12-0.0216%12 May →
cache13–40.035%12 May →
overpass13–5-0.0110%12 May →
cache12–120.0217%11 May →
anubis13–8-0.0023%11 May →
nuke10–13-0.0717%11 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.